I want to thank Lorin for posting the video below. He was the one from my previous article and video. Lorin went to court yesterday over a traffic ticket and even though the prosecutor and cop were there, the lawyer with the robe threw the ticket out.
But here’s where things get really weird as you’ll hear in the video, the lawyer with the robe refuses to say what the grounds are to throw the ticket out. He seems to mock Lorin, he refers to the motion as a “missive”, I thought a formal motion was considered more than a mere letter. If we can just write letters that would save time.
The judge refuses to provide any grounds for the dismissal, instead telling Lorin to get a background in legal research to understand why he is dismissing it. Lorin asks for grounds directly and the lawyer refuses.
My first thought when I heard this was: Is the judge seven years old? Talk about childish behavior. Could you give me a hint? Nope. He forces Lorin to show up and then refuses to disclose why he tossed the ticket out.
Nevertheless, it is another ticket thrown out; the predators only got a little of Lorin’s time. Well done my friend.