This Call of Shame is from Canada. I had a supervisor call me about a low level agent because the agent didn’t care he had no evidence of jurisdiction and was claiming the law may be magical. Things didn’t work out any better with the supervisor, though the supervisor did recognize very quickly he was looking pretty bad and did what terrocrats (terrorist bureaucrat) do when they don’t have any evidence and good faith: they hang up the phone.
The more I deal with the Canada Revenue Agency the more evidence I get they are a ruthless criminal organization. Almost every single man/woman I have spoken to there has exhibited a complete lack of any good faith at all. The only ones who did were not directly involved in the attacks though. They are just as cruel and dishonest as their American counterparts.
Here, as I always do, I get agreement on the operating presumption all “governments” operate by: if you are physically in Canada, then the laws of Canada apply to you. We have our point of agreement and so the next logical question is: do you have any facts to prove the laws of Canada apply just because I’m physically in Canada?
He predictably answers the law. It’s not an answer to the question though, I’m asking for facts, not circular reasoning. I keep asking questions, to keep him on point and instead of answering the question, he has a momentary flash of honesty @ 6:05:
“I really don’t know how to answer you…”
All I wanted him to do next was clarify what he meant by this statement. So I ask him if it’s accurate to say he is not qualified to determine the laws of Canada apply. Then he gets upset and accuses me of trying to “rope” them into something and use his statements against him. This man is threatening to take property by force and I’m the one doing something underhanded? Remember what I said about statism warping your moral compass?
He hangs up, because that is the professional thing to do. I did not get a chance to tell him that we’ve already went to parliament, they are unable to prove the laws they create apply to anyone. I’ve spoken with the Ontario AG‘s office as well as asked the minister of revenue, they have nothing.
If it is so easy to prove the laws apply to us because we’re physically in Canada, then they would be able to prove the facts. Instead, they hang up on me, not even good faith to say that they’ll stop the attack until they can provide the evidence. It is a cruel man/woman who will not just attack peaceful people, but, when confronted with a complete lack of jurisdiction continue the attack.
I also want to point out that I’m not making arguments or being philosophical here; these calls are an ever growing body of evidence with the men and women actually doing the attacking. These are objective examples of politicians and bureaucrats, from cops to prosecutors to magistrates, unable to provide one single fact to support their argument.
And there is a predictable lack of any evidence coming from any critics. The No State Project is live every Saturday from 4-7 pm est on the Liberty Radio Network, all are welcome to present this elusive evidence. Hopefully you will be inspired to confront these criminals and ask them yourself, I think it’s worth it. Tell them you’d be happy to comply with their laws, you just want the evidence as you can be certain after hearing all these examples in the Call of Shame archive, the politicians stealing from you don’t have any evidence either.