When it comes to the calls of shame I’ve posted, critics have claimed I just post the calls with clueless agents, that I cherry pick and leave out the calls where the agents do provide the evidence. This is just to marginalize the truth, to try to cover up the obvious: there are no states, citizens and governments, just people forcing us to pay them. The only way to prove it’s true that I cherry pick is if the critics could provide the evidence the agents can’t. That’s never happened.
Critics ignore the fact that my calls include a federal magistrate and other very educated bureaucrats such as John Buttrick and Nick Cort. Even prosecutors have been unable to provide a single fact to support their argument that if you’re physically in Arizona, then the constitution and laws apply to you.
It’s not because the agents, like the latest Call of Shame with a tax agent, are clueless and uneducated; it’s because there are no facts to support the argument. That is exactly why no critic just lays the facts out when they don’t like the call or my position.
In this call, the agent agrees with the basic presumption the “government” operates under: if one is physically in the United States, then the constitution and laws of the US apply. But, when asked if she has any proof to support this argument, she cannot answer the question and claims her supervisor can.
When I press the agent for a straight answer, she channels the CIA and says she can “neither confirm or deny” whether she is qualified to determine she has jurisdiction over me. It seems obvious to me that if she were qualified to determine jurisdiction over me, then she would say yes.
After all, isn’t it so “obvious” the laws apply to everyone, that if you’re physically in the United States, then the constitution and laws apply to you? It’s so obvious that experienced government employees cannot even say they are qualified to say the constitution applies to anyone.
If it wasn’t for their willingness to kill anyone who doesn’t comply with them, then we’d laugh at them and stop paying attention. It’s lunacy when you take a moment to examine it: She’s qualified to make the argument, but not to actually support the argument. People like that need guns to stay relevant.