Categorized | Articles, Video

Don’t Let Prosecutors Intimidate You – Overcoming Their Flawed Opposition

Posted on February 15th, 2017 by Marc Stevens

When people defend against bureaucratic attacks, they tend to be intimidated by prosecutors.  After all, they are professionals, they have advanced degrees and much more experience in the courts than most.  Don’t let that intimidate you, most times they have no evidence and rely on fear and logical fallacies.  I’ll cover another in this article, the common strawman.

Below is from a pleading filed by a prosecutor in Ohio, Gene Barrett.  This is his second response to a motion to dismiss for prosecutorial misconduct, he is accused of arguing without evidence.  More of the opposition is in the video.

Barrett is knowingly raising an issue never raised, he’s claiming the defense is arguing there is no jurisdiction without his consent.   He then cites a court opinion that the argument has no merit.  Barrett then claims victory.  This is a typical strawman which is:

By exaggerating, misrepresenting, or just completely fabricating someone’s argument, it’s much easier to present your own position as being reasonable, but this kind of dishonesty serves to undermine honest rational debate.

The actual position raised is: the prosecution has no evidence to support their claim the constitution (a written instrument from 1803) applies to me just because I’m physically in Ohio.  This makes Barrett’s entire argument irrelevant.  None of his citations, none of his legal analysis have anything to do with the actual issue raised.

Barrett is not just lying here, he is obstructing justice and it is prosecutorial misconduct.  It is also a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct:

A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue in a proceeding, unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous…

While a few dishonest critics will cry I am bringing high school debating rules into court and court is based on “legal logic”, such criticism does not negate how dishonest Barrett’s opposition is.  Did Barrett assert an issue that is false, that does not have a basis in law and fact?  Yes, any idiot can see that.

This is also why most of the time prosecutors keep their mouths shut in court and don’t response to our paperwork.  They have no evidence, they are just men and women forcing us to pay them.  They are criminals, and criminals have no need for petty things like proof and logic.

So don’t let these lawyers intimidate you with their legalese, it’s easy to recognize their dishonest “legal logic” for the trash it is.  If they had evidence to support their claims, then they would just present their evidence.  They would not raise strawman arguments, argue for a double standard or just chant “frivolous” over and over.  Those with evidence to support their claims just present the evidence.

 

              

3 Comments For This Post

  1. Ed Says:

    Thanks for doing this Marc.

  2. James Partee Says:

    Yes! Thanks Marc for doing this! I’ve been to law libraries and doing my own research. If it wasn’t for you I probably would not have been able to find the article (Ohio evid R 602) on my own. Many many kudos to you and your brazen testacles.

  3. Ajk Says:

    Plenty thanks from Real land republic Of Poland for your compasion &courage
    Ifound what they don’t want to say Q: which Do I Ask is ; what is IT phisical persona which applyed to Statues and regulations , they don’t have simply answer, but I found what IT is – A:IT is your ID – which Has your’s picture and SURNAME and NAME and FATHER and MOTHER and plenty of numbers letters – IT is also front and back side of your’s CQTrust account . They broke your copyright law and all presumption starts when you apply for any ID without protest and demand for correction but is way out you can change NAME of your company and protect IT by copyright and push them let they use in their’s system small letters for names Why you need this to do because pope JPII in Sao Paolo Brasil on 26 july 1985 proclaimed “16 Articles” acc to Numbers Art. 07 is most interesting . All road go from Rome . Greatings from bihind the veil…

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via youtube.com. You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.





Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.






Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter


Advertise Here