Categorized | Articles, Video

Facts About Attack Against Adam Kokesh

Posted on July 16th, 2016 by Marc Stevens

In this video I present the facts about the attack against Adam Kokesh.  Adam bought some land in Arizona, it is located within the imaginary boundaries called Yavapai County.  These lines are no different than the parish boundaries for the Catholic Church; just because you are physically within those boundaries, doesn’t mean you’re within the church.

David Williams, an employee of the county government, did not like that Adam started building and doing improvements on land Adam owned outright without first getting permission from Williams.  Williams believes a written instrument from 1910 creates an obligation on Adam to comply with Williams’s demands.

I spoke with Williams on the phone and he was unable to provide any evidence his claim against Adam is true.  He believes the constitution and code apply to Adam because he’s physically in Arizona, but he admittedly cannot prove it.

Rather than leave Adam alone until he had evidence of jurisdiction, Williams chose to escalate the matter.  While he is telling people Adam chose the hearing, he neglects to mention he only offered Adam a false choice, either an admin hearing or a criminal prosecution.  Despite a third option, acting in good faith and consistent with due process by dropping his attack until he had evidence of jurisdiction, Williams only went with escalation.

I contacted the County Board of Supervisors in an effort to stop escalation, I spoke to Jack Smith, the chairman.  Smith was admittedly not able to prove the constitution and code applied to Adam and agreed to speak with Williams and ask that the matter not be escalated until evidence of jurisdiction was presented.  Smith did not keep his word, instead kicking the can to Craig Brown, district four supervisor.

Despite many messages by phone and email about the situation, Brown never responded.  No one on the Board of Supervisors could present any facts proving the constitution and code apply to Adam just because he’s physically in Arizona.  Neither could one of their attorneys, Jack Fields.

Despite the lack of evidence, Williams was permitted to escalate the matter and Adam has been summoned to an administrative hearing in Prescott, Arizona on 9 August 2016.  I will be assisting.

One thing is certain about the hearing, Williams and his accomplices will still not be able to prove the constitution and code apply to Adam just because he is physically in Arizona.

Adam also posted a video to his YouTube channel detailing his legal attack:

              

22 Comments For This Post

  1. Mark Niebauer Says:

    Thank god you are helping him Mark. . .

  2. Boxer Says:

    Good gawd….maybe you’ll finally turn that Alex Jones’ groupie into an anarchist.

  3. Adam Says:

    You’re brilliant Marc! Better than any lawyer!

    @Boxer You must have me confused with freedom hater Joe Biggs. I wrote the book on freedom: http://TheFreedomLine.com

  4. desertspeaks Says:

    https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/history/americas-economic-history/judge-rules-administrative-court-system-illegal-after-81-years/

    Well it has been a long time coming, but all along there have been discussions behind closed doors (never in public) that the Administrative Law Courts established with the New Deal were totally unfounded and unconstitutional.

  5. NonEntity Says:

    Desert! Wow. That is a huge ruling, in my opinion. Thanks for sharing it.

  6. NonEntity Says:

    Good work, Marc. Boxer, I think you’ve got it spot on. I hope David Koresh, I mean Adam Kokesh, prevails in his desire to peaceably live on his land and share his message of love and community.

  7. joe Says:

    oh, never mind…disregard my previous remark…i seriously doubt you will listen anyway

  8. NonEntity Says:

    Uh, er… previous remark?

  9. spooky2th Says:

    Yeah, what previous remark???

  10. PatriotOne Says:

    i would ask David Williams:
    1) what facts and supporting evidence do you rely upon that prove your code applies upon Adam?
    2) what facts and supporting evidence do you rely upon to prove that you, David, possess standing to apply your code upon Adam?

  11. Boxer Says:

    @Adam:

    “@Boxer You must have me confused with freedom hater Joe Biggs. I wrote the book on freedom:”

    I followed some of you for a bit until I was finally able to break free from the religious chains of “statism”. I think you may still believe in it a bit based on your statement in an interview with Alex Jones when you said:

    “Well I think that’s one of the great opportunities that we have in the american political system with this concept of sovereign states….”

    Regardless, I’d much rather see you on Marc’s site and welcome you towards your journey to anarchy (if you haven’t already started it).

  12. Calvin Says:

    @Boxer: I don’t know… I think Adam makes certain appeals to statists in effort to find common ground to help bring them closer to the ideas of voluntaryism, as you see in his recent video to Bernie supporters. I don’t consider him a statist, and he seems to fully embrace voluntaryism; he’s just trying to broaden the appeal of the message of freedom.

  13. Boxer Says:

    *some of your work

  14. NonEntity Says:

    * <- referant?

  15. Boxer Says:

    @NonE

    Is your request addressed to me?

    https://youtu.be/a46u_yI3RoQ

  16. NonEntity Says:

    Boxer, yes. You have an asterisk followed by something which is meaningless to me. And I can’t find the corresponding asterisk for the referent.

  17. Incubus Says:

    The asterisk was meant to show a grammatical correction, indicating he meant to say “some of your work”.

  18. steve Says:

    Perhaps, instead of fighting government (and subsequently adhering to their rules) you should challenge this another way. What if, by proving their case in a rather novel way, you prove, in a court of their own laws, that theft and control of land is either “accepted” or not. Should if be accepted them you have the right to take, by reasonable force, the property for use as you so see fit. Should it not then the colonist’s that came to the land now known under the name United States of America (herein known under the corporate name of THE UNITES STATES) stole the land and therefore no rules apply.

    It should be noted that, like the “Crown” of the United Kingdom, the U.S. has adopted a rule that the government cannot be taken to justice unless they agree to it.

    Yes, if we follow that old phrase… the tree of liberty is thirsty… let’s nourish it!

  19. NonEntity Says:

    Ah, sorta like, “…followed some of you for a bit…” should be, “…some of your work for a bit…” like that?

    – NonMindReader

  20. Incubus Says:

    That’s correct. It’s common in internet and texting slang. Used to correct something misspelled or not grammatically correct.

    “Are yor pet zombies still alive?”

    Are your*

    “Zombies doesn’t eat brains. That’s an outdated and nasty stereotype.”

    Zombies don’t*

  21. Jarrod Says:

    No, put the asterisk first. It’s more comon.

  22. Jarrod Says:

    *common

1 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. The Best of the Adam Kokesh "Parking Lot" Memes - The Last Bastille Blog Says:

    […] still left to be vetted, given that there is a possible connection between Tomlin’s disclosures and the legal issues revolving around the so-called “Freedom Ranch” in Yavapai County, Arizona; please be aware that […]

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

Saturday, 4-7pm EST: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream broadcast via Ustream.tv. You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.





Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.






Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter


Advertise Here