This latest example for the Call of Shame involves two IRS agents. I asked if she could confirm if there was evidence proving the constitution and code apply and there is jurisdiction. She initially asks my client a question and I have to remind her to speak to me and answer my question. So I ask again if she can confirm there is evidence, her delayed response?
“I prefer not to answer that question.”
I wanted an answer and she predictably wants to put me on hold. She will not tell me why she doesn’t want to answer. We all know it’s because she has no evidence and will only look foolish answering. We’re on hold for a while, so you can jump ahead to 5:32 where the next agent picks up.
We get a supervisor and she answers the question about evidence the constitution and code apply with a yes at about the 6:57 mark. She then claims that working and receiving money is her support. Of course, I ask her if she believes the constitution applies because my client received money and she predictably wants to bail. She must have realized how illogical her position was. Yes, because 200+ year old written instruments magically become applicable to you if you receive money.
She wants to start the conversation over and not discuss the constitution. Before she hangs up on us, she agreed that she cannot confirm there is jurisdiction. You’d think they’d see the need to stop, but they don’t, they are criminals. Now those who see nothing wrong with forcing people to pay for services and have a vested interest in “governments” will refuse to grasp the significance of these calls.
This is an IRS supervisor admitting she cannot confirm there is evidence the constitution and laws apply. If that is not bad enough, she doesn’t do anything to stop the attack and hangs up the phone. All the critics who rant about me being a wacko never address the facts; if they address the 100% record of bureaucrats and politicians unable to provide evidence the laws apply, they marginalize it saying that’s not their job, or they are just ignorant.
They never provide the evidence these predators cannot though. This is another objective record where the very people attacking us cannot prove their laws apply. For those honest critics and those new to the material and are on the fence, listen to the recording and ask yourself this question: Why doesn’t the first agent want to answer if she can confirm there is evidence the constitution and law apply?
If we say she is honestly in over her head, then why not just say she can’t? Good faith dictates that if you can’t confirm there is jurisdiction, then you call off the attack. So even if she is ignorant, she did nothing to stop the attack and kicked the can. That is certainly evidence of bad faith and until they have evidence of jurisdiction it’s proof they are trying to steal from a peaceful man.
While she was certainly in way over her head, we have to put this in context with the other calls and interviews. No matter who the bureaucrat is, whether a supervisor as in this example, IRS legal counsel, federal magistrate and even a spokesman for an attorney general, they are all unable to provide any facts. And let’s not forget none of the critics who have attacked me have put forth any facts to help these politicians out.
She prefers not to answer my question; yeah and I would prefer these predators left us alone, but I can’t just hang up and laugh about it.
Please share this and the other call with everyone you know. Let them hear how dishonest these predators are, that they have no evidence and we can and should be standing up to them.