Categorized | Articles, Success Stories, Video

Joshua Gets Traffic Ticket Kicked Out in New York – Congrats

Posted on September 23rd, 2014 by Marc Stevens

A big congrats to Joshua for standing up to the parasites and getting a ticket kicked out.  And a big thanks for sending me the evidence posted below.

Ticket-Mt Vernon

While critics argue this does not “count” as traffic courts are not “real courts” and that real issues are not raised, they’re wrong.  The same issues are raised as would be, and have been raised, in “real” courts that involve felony and misdemeanor charges.  Keep in mind critics just can’t accept the truth: there are no governments, just men and women forcing us to give them money; they are criminals despite calling themselves “honorable”.

The main issue raised in the motion to dismiss/demur is the prosecutor has not presented any evidence the constitution and laws of the plaintiff “state” apply and there is any jurisdiction.  This groundless argument (the laws apply to us) is the basis of a traffic ticket and a felony possession charge.  So the venue is not important, the same argument is made against you, so it’s logical to attack that same argument.  Pay no attention to the critics’ logical fallacies and distractions.

That’s what Joshua did and it resulted in the ticket being kicked out.  Another example where someone stood up for himself and didn’t hire an attorney (officer of the court) and argue issues of law hoping the lawyer with the robe agreed with him.  No, he stuck to issues of fact and pointed out the prosecution had not presented facts.  That cannot just be “denied”, the facts must appear on the record.  Yes, the judge can avoid the issue, but that doesn’t make the facts magically appear.

If you are being attacked by those called government, it would be smart and effective for y ou to challenge their arguments, the foundation being: the constitution and laws apply and they have jurisdiction over you.

It is not in your best interest to give the people attacking you a free pass.  There are no sacred cows, all arguments are subject to challenge.  If you think this argument should not be challenged, please call the show and enlighten us with your reasoning.

 

 

              

16 Comments For This Post

  1. Andy Says:

    “critics argue this does not “count” as traffic courts are not “real courts””

    They’re right. They’re not legitimate courts. They’re criminals impersonating courts — frauds. “there are no governments, just men and women forcing us to give them money; they are criminals despite calling themselves “honorable”.”

    Seems the critics want it both ways.

  2. Martin Padilla Says:

    Congratulations Joshua, There is no Government, is all mind control, making us falsely believe there is a State.

  3. indio007 Says:

    Congrats!!!!

  4. Pete Says:

    Great job!

  5. RAD Says:

    I think any intellectually honest person who listens to the Colby Granville show will realize that Marc completely obliterated the Mr. Granville’s presumptions and liberal feel good-isms. On some level doesn’t it seem like these authoritarians KNOW what they are saying is non-sense? But that they value conformity over truth? And since they perceive themselves as conforming to the status quo, they DELIBERATELY LIE to obfuscate the facts that contradict their narrative?

  6. Jeff Says:

    Article I
    SECTION. 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

    My question here is, are codes and statutes that which are created by House Bills ? If not then you simply signed a contract and you are obligated to it. With a drivers license however, there is no “Full Disclosure” in the contract making it null and void, besides the fact that you are not an EMPLOYEE (recieveing monetary conpensation)of the state which drivers licenses are for to begin with, or that you are contracted for hire by a “passenger”. But, that does not stop the two armed uniformed matrix agents who presume you are stupid and that you are not going to be able to challenge the “complaint” with a “claim” in federal court aka Charlie Sprinkle. The NAME game, Kate fo Giaga (Lose the Name Win the Game) got me a continuance only, just for your info.

    Lets be real here. Exercising your rights can be dangerous to others. i think it is better to get a ticket than get into a reck, and policeing yourself is like alowing the moffia to police itself. Go ahead piss off your neighbor and stare down the barrel of gun or be your own authority to protect and serve risking your life every day. The cost of running a state is enormous, if the fed. res. just printed money for them than accountability would be near zero.

    Don’t get me wrong i love my Constitution even though there is corruption and what institution does not have corruption, man is corrupt, period. And what of the People, how ignorant are they, by plan of course, it’s not all our fault but, there is no excuse for ignorance and we get what we deserve.

  7. pop de adam Says:

    “No state” sounds like it has failed at boot? There are no states? Can non_states enter into any? Can non-states be states? confused.

  8. pop de adam Says:

    You could read any of that and I am nothing, you might also recognize the ape in the room, with an affidavit a statement is made. Any statement made will be used against you. In some repect: How are you? How may I be of service? What the fuck is your issue?

    Yes officer, abominations are countergrace amongst the regimentists

  9. pop de adam Says:

    adonitions

  10. pop de adam Says:

    adminstation

  11. pop de adam Says:

    admiral

  12. pop de adam Says:

    fuck you! admonishment!

  13. Incubus Says:

    I don’t know what just happened in that series of posts but it was damn funny.

  14. jake han Says:

    EVERY article.

    It’s all rhetoric, and no actual “how to-s” of doing it yourself, or analyzing the case.

  15. jake han Says:

    In your pdf here,

    you recommend saying

    “Repeat, “Me, I am not an attorney I don’t understand.”

    But this is exactly what you want the plaintiff cop to say so that you can tell the judge he has no standing.

    But this would equally apply to you, if you said this, would it not?

    Please enlighten.

  16. jake han Says:

    Are state lawyers present for the cops? They would schedule traffic hearings in batches to be most efficient. So are there state attorneys on the plaintiff’s side? Has there ever been? How frequent is it, in approximate percentage of cases? What should you do if so?

    Real life scenarios don’t go exactly as you foresee. There needs to be contingencies for plans of action.

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via youtube.com. You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.





Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.






Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter


Advertise Here