Categorized | Articles

Top 10 Tips For Traffic Court

Posted on August 28th, 2007 by Marc Stevens

If you’re unfortunate to have gotten a traffic ticket, keep the following tips in mind, your chances of getting it kicked out are much greater:

1. Do not be argumentative.
2. Don’t bring your own opinion or arguments to convince the judge.
3. Stick to the facts.
4. Repeat I am not an attorney I don’t understand.
5. Don’t object and press a particular point more than twice.
6. Stay on point.
7. Only accept responsive answers to questions.
8. Ask questions
9. Get judge and, or the prosecutor to commit to positions.
10. Use those positions/arguments against the judge or prosecutor.


1.  Traffic courts are scams run by people only interested in taking money.  They are not in place to administer justice.  Being argumentative only ensures you will be separated from your money.  Going in thinking justice is being administered is to start off on the wrong foot.  Any traffic court judge interested in administering justice would throw out the majority of traffic tickets within minutes of them being filed by the police and mail an apology to each defendant for their time wasted on the traffic stop.

2.  Traffic court judges don’t care what we think, except of course what we think is the easiest and fastest way to pay the court fine.  We are considered guilty the moment the cop decides to write the ticket.  Traffic court is about making it look good and the judge is always going to be perceived as correct and you wrong.  After all, he’s judge.  But, we can get the judge to contradict himself.  If an argument or opinion is used, it should always be the judge’s.

3.  Sticking to the facts is the fastest and most effective way to demonstrate there is no case.  Just asking a couple of questions is usually enough to have the only witness against you declared incompetent which requires his testimony, including the ticket, to be stricken.  Keep in mind that impeaching the only witness does not mean a judge will strike the testimony and throw the ticket out.

4.  All non-lawyers are legally incapable of defending themselves and it is unfair to put someone on trial who does not understand the nature and cause of the proceedings against them.  The more the judge explains about what is going on, the more can be used to make him contradict himself and prove there is no case.

5.  This is related to number one.  If I keep pressing a point the judge is only going to get angry and judges are notorious for having anger management problems.  Remember, traffic court judges do not care.  One thing they care about is making the robbery look good.  Don’t help him make it look good.

6.  Lawyers, with and without those flowing black robes, are masters of diversion.  Never forget their goal is not getting to the truth and administering justice, it’s about getting the money you worked hard to earn.  If they get you off-point, they win; your attention on real issues is gone and before you know it the proceeding is over.

7.  Only accepting responsive answers keeps things on point and works to destroy the appearance of a case.  Beware though, know in advance what is responsive to the question.  Bureaucrats are very good at giving what may appear to be responsive answers; they may sound good, but they are not responsive.  A good example is “Factually, what is the constitution?” and the bureaucrat answers with: “It’s the supreme law of the law.”  It sounds impressive, but it’s not responsive to the question.  A responsive answer is devastating to a bureaucrat’s case.  I have several scripts available I have used in court successfully.

8.  One tactic judges, lawyers and bureaucrats use to divert attention away from what they are doing is to accuse people of “arguing.”  This is an attempt to make anyone in court look bad, as if we’re the problem and not the traffic court.  By just asking questions, we can point out we not arguing, just asking questions.  From experience, this is very embarrassing for the individual accusing me of arguing.  Asking questions is also incredibly effective at demonstrating there is no case, provided of course, we stay on point and only accept responsive answers.

9. Traffic court judges do not care if you think they have violated the constitution or the law.  But, because their main job is to make robbing people look good, traffic court judges do not like to contradict themselves.  To do this, I ask questions to get the judge to commit to certain positions e.g., “Am I entitled to be informed of the nature and cause of the charges and proceedings?” and “Am I entitled to a fair hearing?”  Because the very nature of traffic courts is unfair, it’s easy to get the judge to contradict himself.

10.  The judge’s and prosecutor’s positions can always be used to get them to contradict themselves later.  As with the first question above, after a few more questions the judge will say, “I’m not here to answer your questions.”  I just have to then remind him he already told me I was entitled to be informed.  Also, by asking just a couple of questions, I’ve had judges declare a witness competent, incompetent and then competent again in only a few minutes.  By contradicting himself like that, all pretense of fairness is gone.

One of the most valuable pieces of information you can learn about traffic courts and bureaucrat attacks is this: A ticket/complaint is not synonymous with a case.  Of course a traffic court judge will disagree with this, his object is not truth and justice, it’s taking money away from people.

Remember, just because a cop writes a ticket does not mean he has presented a case before a court.  No court has the “legal” authority to proceed against someone unless a case is presented to it, this is just a short list of the “authorities” to prove it.  However, traffic court judges are interested only in getting your money, so things like the “law” do not interest them.  I discuss this in detail in my book Adventures in Legal Land, in several articles and on my radio show The No State Project.  There are also archived radio shows I’ve appeared on here and a new video series here about beating traffic tickets .

Marc Stevens is an author, consultant and radio show host.  He is an expert on the nature of the court system, his groundbreaking book Adventures in Legal Land rips the veil of legitimacy from the “state” and exposes it for what it is, a public relations scheme.  Using their own words against them, Marc Stevens proves there is no state.  You can listen to his radio show The No State Project live every Saturday on We the People Radio Network.

              

13 Comments For This Post

  1. corporeal Says:

    HI
    GLAD I FOUND YOUR SITE.
    HOW CAN I TUNE INTO We the People Radio Network?
    And what time?

  2. Marc Stevens Says:

    @ corp it’s now on http://lrn.fm 4-7 est every Sunday.

  3. Jay Says:

    Was stopped by a cop who was out of his jurisdiction, he called local sheriff who wrote the ticket. No radar or laser, said he paced me. open record request found that he was off duty that day and there is no dash or body cam. I went to original arraignment, plead not guilty and asked for a jury trial, moved to superior court, another arraignment in January, 2017. Please advise.

    Thanks,

    Jay

  4. Marc Stevens Says:

    I always start with the motion to dismiss and discovery request.

  5. Boxer Says:

    Jay

    Have you joined the forum? I recommend doing so as it will provide you the opportunity to slow down and think through your approach.

  6. NonEntity Says:

    And when you do, Jay, put “serious” in the title of your thread to keep idiots like me from taking the thread off on tangents. Unless, of course, you enjoy tangents.

  7. Habenae Est Dominatus Says:

    Squirrel!

  8. Jay Says:

    I’m not sure if you are addressing me,I’m kinda new to this and do wish to participate on a deeper level. I do believe that I was approved for the forum but,as of yet,I have not figured out how to get in it and utilize it.

  9. NonEntity Says:

    Jay, is your name Jay? Then the posts addressed to you are probably addressed to you. 😉 And since you failed to address your post,I, for one, am clueless as to whom you post was addressed. As to the forum, you should have a user name and a password, at least if you enjoyed Marc and asked him for forum access. If you go to the forum’s address and enter those you should then have access to the forum. At that point you should poke around and you will probably figure out how to read and make posts. Ask questions and someone will probably lend a helping hand. If I have missed your point/issue, please attempt to explain your problem more clearly so we can help you get in and work on your issues. Okay? 🙂

  10. NonEntity Says:

    “Enjoyed” should be “emailed.” Sorry.

  11. Jay Says:

    Sorry Non,I am a different ‘Jay’,and I have since worked out the forum situation. Perhaps from this point on,I will use my username (kiltedjay)to prevent any further confusion. Again,still working out the mechanics of this environment. Bear with me,I’ll get up to speed as fast as I can!!

  12. NonEntity Says:

    Good j… kilted, I’m looking forward to seeing you on the forum.

  13. kar smith Says:

    The newsletter signup messaged/informed me to let Marc know that the newletter list is down.

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and he can add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via youtube.com. You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.





Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.






Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter


Advertise Here