Predictably, the Minnesota Bar Association has rejected my complaint against Gerald Wilhelm. It is laughable, they used a logical fallacy as grounds. The old strawman. Raise an argument I didn’t make so that they can easily reject it.
It’s not just wrong, but it’s insulting and is further evidence of bad faith. This Patrick R. Burns must think I’m so stupid I’d buy this free pass he’s given to Wilhelm. Speaking from personal experience, lawyers tend to think non-lawyers are morons who can’t recognize when lawyers are lying.
I go through more detail in the video below. But apparently Burns’s job is protecting dishonest lawyers and using logical fallacies. I doubt he will take the time to confirm Wilhelm filed only a prayer for relief, not a valid cause of action where the court could acquire standing. I think there is no chance of him asking about evidence the constitution and code apply either. We already know that is a sacred cow and we shall not investigate.
I’ll post any responses from Burns or other lawyer from the bar.