Clint Richardson's arguments
Current time: 07-23-2017, 03:46 PM
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Author: Marc Stevens
Last Post: eye2i2hear
Replies: 49
Views: 21312

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Clint Richardson's arguments
06-25-2015, 02:53 PM
Post: #13
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments
(06-25-2015 12:07 PM)Clint Richardson Wrote:  So again, follow the guru and continue to be a slave that can say "I won in court" or learn the grammar that will make you immune from the court system.

-Clint-

Bold is my emphasis. Can't help the insult though can you Clint? I won't moderate your insults, just those against you.

So far you are unable to show any evidence of this alleged "immunity." All you have is a "KW" who claims to have an alleged declaratory judgment, but strangely, he won't give you a copy. Why not?

What you have is someone's word. I've seen many, many people claiming to make people "immune from the court system." Like you, they had absolutely no facts, no proof of their claims. I'm not surprised you mentioned this was not a public court, care to elaborate on the name of the court, who actually gave this alleged declaratory judgment? A private court, that issues declaratory judgments that are followed by public courts and government employees and agents?

Keep trying to marginalize the tickets, assessments and felony complaints kicked I have posted here, it is still what you don't have, actual proof. The honest investigators see you have no proof of this alleged immunity.

[Image: breaking-bad-gif-saul-goodman-9986269.gif]

"grammar that will make you immune from the court system." I thought it was "bloodline" only? You mentioned "White, but not Caucasian..." Or do you mean "grammar [with the right bloodline] will make you immune from the court system?

If government services were valuable and the market wanted them, they wouldn't be provided on a compulsory basis.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - pigpot - 06-24-2015, 01:26 AM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - Marc Stevens - 06-25-2015 02:53 PM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - pigpot - 06-25-2015, 09:58 PM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - Andy - 06-23-2015, 09:13 PM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - Ripsaw - 06-25-2015, 05:14 AM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - Andy - 06-25-2015, 07:13 PM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - Kawlinz - 06-25-2015, 08:53 PM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - pigpot - 06-27-2015, 06:25 AM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - Ripsaw - 06-27-2015, 06:13 AM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - Andy - 06-27-2015, 06:34 AM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - zonsb - 06-27-2015, 08:51 AM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - zonsb - 06-28-2015, 09:39 AM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - Andy - 06-28-2015, 01:43 PM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - Andy - 06-28-2015, 03:49 PM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - zonsb - 06-28-2015, 05:08 PM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - Andy - 06-29-2015, 01:44 AM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - Andy - 06-29-2015, 10:33 AM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - pigpot - 06-30-2015, 03:40 AM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - Andy - 06-30-2015, 05:06 AM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - Ripsaw - 06-30-2015, 08:45 AM
RE: Clint Richardson's arguments - Ripsaw - 07-01-2015, 03:53 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)