Listener challenge: can you count how many times the bureaucrats refer back to the law when they are being questioned on the applicability of the law? Leave your tally in the comments section below.
Archive | Call of Shame
#CoS – May 15, 2013 – Helen’s Council Tax Pretrial Hearing: More Circular Fallacies Instead of the Evidence
Posted on May 23, 2013 by Calvin
#CoS – May 10, 2013 – Processing Request… -> Denial of Service
Posted on May 11, 2013 by Marc Stevens
I’m doing some investigation on the Keene, New Hampshire police. Since Ian Freeman was accused of being subject to the laws of the state of New Hampshire, I wanted to know the facts they relied on to prove this. I spoke with the prosecutor Jean Kilham and she was unwilling to speak to me about [...]
#CoS – Apr 15, 2013 – A Good Example of Countering Non-responsiveness with the Canadian Revenue Agency
Posted on April 20, 2013 by Calvin
Within bureaucracy, a malicious normalcy bias can easily develop. This systematic conditioning eventually leads to a frustrating ether of cognitive dissonance when confronted with questions of facts and evidence. This cognitive dissonance is heard in the form of non-responsive replies to some very simple and straightforward questions. It is of the utmost importance that you [...]
#CoS – Apr 11, 2013 – More Evidentiary Stonewalling From the IRS
Posted on April 13, 2013 by Marc Stevens
This has been a record setting week for getting hung up on. This is a pretty good admission: I ask a simple question about evidence and she launches into a rant about frivolous arguments. I say again: “I don’t have an argument at this point, I’m asking if there’s evidence. She answers with the truth: [...]
#CoS – Apr 9, 2013 – IRS District Counsel: “Frivolous Questions”
Posted on April 11, 2013 by Calvin
When questioning the IRS District Counsel on “the evidence to support a finding or the opinion that the CONstitution and code actually apply to Mr._____” yesterday, the attorney immediately replied she wasn’t “going to deal with any frivolous questions” and “the case is set for hearing and we’ll deal with it at hearing.” So, in [...]
#CoS – Mar 7, 2013 – County Attorney in Washington State
Posted on March 28, 2013 by Calvin
There is one question being asked that this particular attorney is refusing to responsively answer at all costs, even at the cost of the truth and her own words. The single question is “what evidence to you have that the code applies?” Within this 19 minute call of shame, she doesn’t bother citing any facts [...]
NY Tax Agent Cannot Confirm if There’s Evidence of Jurisdiction
Posted on March 23, 2013 by Marc Stevens
Sorry this took so long to post, it’s been really busy. I’ve spoken about this on the show, it’s the call with a New York state tax agent who cannot confirm if there is evidence of jurisdiction over my client. I ask if there is evidence and Nicole doesn’t answer, instead at the 2:40 mark [...]
#CoS – Mar 7, 2013 – Kurt’s IRS Call
Posted on March 08, 2013 by Calvin
A BIG round of applause to Kurt for having the courage and persistence to question the IRS on what evidence they have to prove the applicability of their code. He did a great job keeping the focus on that single issue, despite their many attempts to deviate from giving a responsive answer. Lets go through [...]
Make a Bureaucrat Run – Just Ask Them for the Facts
Posted on March 02, 2013 by Marc Stevens
As usual, I spent my week helping people resolve problems. And as usual, that means I’m going to spend a lot of time talking to the psychopaths that are attacking them. This week was no different. The first is a call from Monday 25 Feb 2013 to the IRS. We had been on hold for [...]
#CoS – Mar 1, 2013 – More Non-responsiveness and Logical Fallacies from a Wyoming County Prosecuting Attorney
Posted on March 01, 2013 by Calvin
Two simple questions; 1) Is there evidence that the Wyoming CONstitution and code apply? and 2) Are there witnesses with personal firsthand knowledge of such empirical evidence? Now let’s track the non-responses: “…I am guessing there is a video from this incident…” “…the statue is for speeding, if he was speeding then it applies…” “Why [...]
