Speaking with Andrea of the Ada County Sheriff‘s Public Information Office, we continue to build the case that the actual evidence statist-bureaucrats rely on to prove their constitutions and codes apply remains a vague, abstract concept that they unfortunately can’t ever seem to describe or define with any specifics or facts.
At the 1:06 mark, Andrea confirmed her belief that “while physically in the STATE of Idaho; the constitution and laws do apply,” however, when questioned on “what facts and/or evidence she has to prove those constitutions and laws actually apply,” she immediately reaches for the “I’m not a legal expert” dodge. But you see Andrea, while we’re all not astrophysicists, we all can still identify and openly discuss the laws of gravity and how it applies because the facts, in this case, are truly “obvious” and “given;” terms ironically used by many bureaucrats when proposed with the exact same line of Socratic questioning.
So when referred to the “legal experts,” it was pointed out that the prosecutor’s office will not return correspondence, a commissioner hung-up after a hostile outburst of false accusations, none of the other commissioners would return correspondence, CIC Director Todd Dvorak slammed his phone after yelling “this office will not cooperate with you,” and also hung-up by two other bureaucrats, she wants to put it on these very people to officially confirm evidence of what they refuse to even engage in with rational dialogue? Based on the limited attention given to the inquires, how could one expect these “legal experts” to honestly respond to the questions of evidence they’ve already rejected and dismissed out-of-hand?
Finally, the statist overture climaxes when Marc asks “when considering that there are peaceful people sitting in prison based on the assumption of jurisdiction, does it concern you at all that you are not able to actually prove jurisdiction?” with an all too comfortable soft “no” and that she’s “very comfortable with how the laws are applied here” despite that being brought to her attention; the fact they, the constitution and codes/[jurisdiction], are being applied completely arbitrarily. Accepting arbitrary assumptions from authority figures doesn’t support basic standards of cognitive thought, but it’ll provide you a decent quality of life on taxpayer welfare while so-called “victimless criminals” are torn from their lives every day. Yeeeah, great ethics there folks….
It sure must be comfortable to be part of the privileged-class that has never seen the darker side of the coercive system they support.