Categorized | Call of Shame

CoS – May 13, 2015 – Brainwash, Rinse and Repeat with a Canadian Crown Prosecutor

Posted on May 19th, 2015 by Calvin

Brainwash, rinse and repeat: …that ‘argument‘ at trial.  You can make that ‘argument‘ at trial.  You can make…  These are very typical dodges to tough evidentiary questions we get when we are being attacked by these predators.  If you ask a question, and they start with, “As I said…“; you are not going to get a responsive answer.

Though there’s a lot to unpack in this particular Call of Shame, there is nothing substantially concrete that was ever confirmed; this is the mastered trade-craft of a well-conditioned deceptionist.  Though this prosecutor is not very good yet, very transparent, like she wasn’t even trying to be convincing.

I do address this call in some detail at the end of last week’s No State Project, so I won’t go into much detail here.  What is important is to notice the lame attempt at a straw man.  When I ask her directly for the evidence her argument is based, she claims the argument her evidence is insufficient is a legal question for the court to decide.

While I point out each time I am asking for her to just disclose her evidence, if any, she sticks to her straw man and refuses to make a disclosure.  She request we put it in writing.  We did, but I’m not holding my breathe she will be responsive.

You can’t provide what doesn’t exist.  If there was evidence proving the laws apply to us, then the evidence would be provided.  And no, claims of punishment is not evidence supporting the argument/opinion.

If you, or someone you know thinks there is evidence, then please call into a live broadcast.


6 Comments For This Post

  1. RAD Says:

    “The crown is proceeding”.

    When she talks about “the crown” she’s not talking about a jewel encrusted hat. She’s referring to the deity of the Canadian government religion. “The crown” is one of those non-physical “entities” statists believe in as scriptural articles of faith of their religion.

  2. desertspeaks Says:

    The song and dance of lies and fraud

  3. stljanski Says:

    “we have facts, we have evidence, but im not going to tell you what they are, were going to trial, and the judge will help me out ignoring these facts and evidence, cause we don’t need no stinking facts, we dont need no stinking evidence, nor do we need informants/witnesses, the violation is my facts, my evidence is here on this piece of paper oh and ..we got guns, and you don’ pay up, peasant.”…ahhh, is that a yes or a no? to my simple question?, my highness?

  4. Marc Stevens Says:

    @ stal, you nailed it.

  5. Boxer Says:

    Gotta love those Canadians, eh?

  6. Bo Says:

    Rad, I’ll second that.

    Your quite correct in saying the crown is a deity.

    It’s interesting to arrive at that knowledge through the fun filled way of the symbolic understanding of flora, particular the crown being said to be, “the fairest flower of the prerogative”, and how that relates to the pharaohic lotus flower.

    Ignore videos, for a quick read and understanding of material explaining the crown, when you scroll down to title headed – INTERPRETATION OF SYMBOLISM REFLECTING EVOLVED CONTEXTUAL CHANGES IN HISTORICALLY DIFFERENT OWNERSHIP.



4 Trackbacks For This Post


    […] An example of a scribe avoiding ‘disclosure’ because there are no facts to which an accusation can be based. This particular scribe is reliant on the head-scribe of the court (judge), to disallow the presentation of actual facts as evidence. Why ? “Because they said so.” – CoS – May 13, 2015 – Brainwash, Rinse and Repeat with a Canadian Crown Prosecutor […]

  2. NSP - Jun 6, 2015 - [UPDATE: FULL PODCAST] - Says:

    […] Recent Call-of-Shame: a Canadian bureaucrat claims she doesn’t have to prove their laws apply. […]

  3. Rudy Ogden - Criminal, Liar for the New Hampshire Labor Dept. - Says:

    […] and in court many times; objections were made and denied.  Such collusion is proven by the many prosecutors who have told me they don’t have to have evidence proving the laws apply.  Because speculation is permitted, […]

  4. NSP - Nov 28, 2015 - Says:

    […] Brainwash, Rinse and Repeat with a Canadian Crown Prosecutor. […]

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.

Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.

Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter

Advertise Here