If the IRS was not a criminal organization destroying people’s lives, I probably would not post calls like this. And this is not isolated, this kind of nonsense is very common, I had another call to a bureaucrat in New Hampshire who pulled the same thing soon after this call.
The tactic is to make claims as if they are irrefutably true. If we question them about it, they claim they’re not qualified and will refer you to someone who is qualified. I’ve always referred to this as the “state dept. two step.” Avoid any responsibility for your claims.
If we point out the contradiction:
Why are you making claims you just admitted you aren’t qualified to make?
They will just keep telling you they will transfer you to someone else. I tried to get this agent to answer, but since she’s on the phone it’s too easy to refuse and then transfer me to another department.
Honest people will stop making claims they are admittedly not qualified to make. Those called “government” are criminals, so since they force us to pay them, they don’t need to act in good faith. Forcing people to pay you means never having to have evidence to support your claims and never having to be logically and morally consistent.
This call is more evidence of just how immoral those called “government” are. This agent wasn’t fazed by her lack of qualifications to make claims that hurt real people. The next agent claimed she was also not qualified and transferred us again, this time we got disconnected before the next department could pick up.
She claims the income proves the constitution and code apply, but when I ask her to explain how and why, she cut me off saying:
I can’t explain.
Then you need to stop making such claims as they cause damage to peaceful people. But that didn’t stop the next agent I spoke with.
Melissa Delorey is a hearing officer for the Labor Department in New Hampshire. Despite the fact she was intending, as part of her job, to make numerous legal determinations against a friend, she admitted she was not “the most qualified” to do so. I was asking her about proof the constitution applied to a friend just because he was in New Hampshire. She actually claimed the statutes (“RSA“) were proof the constitution applied.
When I asked how the RSA proves the constitution applied, instead of answering, being honest the RSA is not evidence the constitution applies, she double downed claiming:
I’m not the person to do that.
If she’s not the one qualified to provide proof their “supreme law” applied, then how could she make decision on that same law? All she could do was insist she, as hearing officer, was the wrong one, we had to speak to someone else and she hung up on us.
Logic dictates that since the constitution is ostensibly the authority for the RSA, then the RSA is irrelevant until the constitution is proven to apply. Ms. Delorey, admits she is not qualified to prove the constitution applies, while insisting the RSA does. That is not just logically wrong, but morally also as this directly affects a peaceful man.
If there was evidence proving a written instrument from 1784 applied to us today, for no other reason than we’re physically present in New Hampshire, then they would provide it. But there isn’t evidence. All they have are appeals to tradition, authority, consequences (their force continuum and prison system) and circular logic, the rules apply because the rules say so.
I’m not saying my position is true because agents cannot explain how/why the code applies. My position is true because “government” is just men and women forcing us to pay them. Because of that there is no proof there are citizens as you need reciprocal obligations of allegiance and protection. Forcing people to pay proves such obligations do not exist. Without citizens there is no state, without a state there is no government.
All you have are men and women forcing us to pay them. So if you are being attacked and you challenge their claims, you’ll recognize their tactic and be able to show their claims have no merit.