Categorized | Interviews

Marc on Invisible Assets Podcast – Nov 3, 2011

Posted on November 4th, 2011 by Calvin

Marc Stevens joins Invisible Assets Podcast for a discussion focused on “De-Mystifying the STATE” on November 3rd, 2011.

              

8 Comments For This Post

  1. Incubus Says:

    New book, eh? And so the legend continues….. :p

  2. Marc Stevens Says:

    hey now

  3. damon Says:

  4. damon Says:

    O.k. At 55:14 I have to comment on lady. She was CORRECT in asking about the w-8ben form. See this is part of the ‘presumption’ they create. If you ‘file’ a w-4 (defined as a VOLUNTARY WITHHOLDING AGREEMENT) and you ‘claim’ exempt on it , it is automatically admittance to ‘taxpayer’ status. Non-taxpayers CANNOT claim ANY exemptions to something that they are otherweise NOT subject to in the first place. ONLY ‘taxpayers’ can claim ‘exemptions’. You are not ‘exempt’, you are simply NOT subject to.

    And yes the CORRECT form is a w-8ben form that YOU YOURSELF define ALL the words to. YOU make your own w-8ben form which their own ‘rules’ SAY you can [read Instructions for form W-8ben]. This form is for people or are neither ‘U.s. Citizens” nor ‘resident aliens’. Meaning a Non-resident alien NON individual as defined in their code. Cognative dissonence folks. It is the ONLY form for American nationals.

  5. damon Says:

    O.k. Here at 57:00 a man calls in talking about being ‘invisible’ to the ‘state’. He states that “after 30 days you need to ‘register’ with the local school board”. What he fails to realize is that it is after 30 days he by some act establishes ‘residnece’ within the state. Just simply physically moving to another location DOES NOT establish ‘residence”. He is “in-tansitou” or “transient” or “sojourning”. Meaning a ‘NON-RESIDENT’. Marc cannot do very much for him except as he says ‘limit the damage’ if this guy personally CLAIMS to be a ‘residnet’ or by some act tacitly establishes ‘residnece’ in the de-facto state. They even give you a list of what establishes a ‘rebuttable presumption of residence’ within usually the Motor Vehicle Code for crying out loud. No judge, nor anybody will challenge his CLAIM as a ‘resident’. Residence does not deal with physical location it deals with CONTRACTS or legal obligations with the ‘state’. Legal obligations are only created by what YOU YOURSELF put down on their forms and how you describe yourself in relation to the jurisdiction they claim. This is why a NON-residnet is not subject to ‘title and registration’ requirements under their motor vehicle codes. They always operate under a presumption.

  6. damon Says:

    This is in regards to the man that called in and ASSUMES ‘residence’ is eaqual to sojourning. Here from there own ‘regulations they tell you. Remember there is a maxim that states’

    It is not he who reads the law, but he who understands the law.

    By way of example I will use the California Motor Vehicle Code;

    Identification Card and Residency Requirements
    (from the California Motor Vehicle Code):
    §

    516. “Resident’ means any person who manifests an intent to live or be located in THIS state on more than a temporary or transient basis. Presence in THE state for six months or more in any 12-month period gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of residency. The following are evidence of residency within THIS state:

    A few things need to be noticed here. First being aware that a ‘state’ is NOT a geographical land mass and that the ‘state’ or A ‘state’ can ONLY ‘exist’ WITHIN the land mass.

    Secondly, The wording they use is INTENTIONAL. They state ;

    “Resident’ means any person who manifests an intent to live or be located in THIS state on more than a temporary or transient basis.

    See that part that states “THIS state”? This is an intentional statement. How do you ‘establish’ a ‘residency’ within ‘THIS state’ according to them. Well they tell you;

    “The following are evidence of residency within THIS state:”

    (a) Address where registered to vote.
    (b) Location of employment or place of business.
    (c) Payment of resident tuition at a public institution of higher education.
    (d) Attendance of dependents at a primary or secondary school.
    (e) Filing a homeowner’s property tax exemption
    (f) Renting or leasing a home for use as a residence.
    (g) Declaration of residency to obtain a license or any other privilege or benefit not ordinarily extended to a non-resident.
    (h) Possession of a California driver’s license (or identification card).
    (i) Other acts, occurrences, or events that indicate presence in the state is more than temporary or transient.

    All these are easily avoidable. One in particular I would like you to pay attention to is (g) which states

    (g) Declaration of residency to obtain a license or any other privilege or benefit not ordinarily extended to a non-resident.

    You cannot nor will they issue you a ‘license’ if you claim to be a non-resident, I know I have tried. Resident has nothing to do with pysical presence. If you yourself DECLARE and CLAIM to be a ‘resident’ well that is up to you.

    They tell you what they define ‘resident’ to mean;

    § 12505. (a) For purposes of this division only and notwithstanding Section 516, residency shall be determined as a person’s state of DOMICILE. “State of domicile” means the state where a person has his or her true, fixed, and permanent home or principle residence and to which he or she has manifested the intention of returning whenever he or she is absent.

    Only YOU can establish YOUR INTENT! ONLY YOU can establish your DOMICILE! This is why ONLY YOU can establish where you are ‘resident’.

    A “domicile” is the place where the law regards a person to be, regardless of whether he is corporeally found there. U.S. v. Novero, D.C.Mo., 58 F.Supp. 275, 278.

    Term “domicile” connotes a place with which a person has a connection for CERTAIN LEGAL PURPOSES, e.g., JURISDICTION!!!!, determination of legitimacy, descent of personal property. In re Moore’s Estate, 415 P.2d 653, 656, 68 Wash.2d 792.

    “Domicile” implies a nexus between a person and place of such permanence as to AUTHORIZE CONTROL OF LEGAL STATUS, relationship and responsibilities of the domiciliary. Dosamantes v. Dosamantes, Tex.Civ.App., 500 S.W.2d 233, 236.

    [West’s Words& Phrases]

    They also tell you in (g)

    “(g) Declaration of residency to obtain a license or any other privilege or benefit not ordinarily extended to a non-resident.”

    “ANY OTHER PRIVILEGE NOT ORDINARILY EXTENDED TO A NON-RESIDENT…! ”

    By way of example in the Michigan Motor Vehicle Code this is how they define ‘non-resident’;

    MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE (EXCERPT)
    Act 300 of 1949

    257.34 “Nonresident” defined.

    Sec. 34.

    “Nonresident” means every person who is not a resident of this state.

    See how the sneaks tell you what it IS NOT but not what it is? Why do you think that they do this? Do you think they want to keep you ignorant?

    Did they ‘define’ ANYTHING at all?

    Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 423:
    definition. A description of a thing by its properties; an explanation of the meaning of a word or term. The process of stating THE EXACT meaning of a word by means of other words. Such a description of the thing defined, including all essential elements and excluding all nonessential, as to distinguish it from all other things and classes.”

    [Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 423]

    These guys are a riot aren’t they? Isn’t it a well setteled rule in English grammar and lexicons not to define a word by using the SAME word?

    “Every fruit that is not a banana is a non-banana…” Say wha?

    If you do not ‘manifest’ an INTENT to to ‘live’ in THIS ‘state’ you are a ‘non-resident’. Therefore not even elligable for a ‘privilege’ from the ‘state’.

    The only one and TRUE lawgiver has warned us;

    Hosea 4:6
    My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.

    “You shall make no covenant [contract or franchise] with them [foreigners, pagans], nor with their [pagan government] gods [laws or judges]. They shall not dwell in your land [and you shall not dwell in theirs by becoming a “resident” in the process of contracting with them], lest they make you sin against Me [God]. For if you serve their gods [under contract or agreement or franchise], it will surely be a snare to you.”
    [Exodus 23:32-33, Bible, NKJV]

    This is why we are strangers and pilgrims on the earth and are seperate from the vanities of man and their wicked imaginations;

    Hebrews 11:13
    These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, and CONFESSED that they were STRANGERS and PILGRIMS (non-resident!) on the earth.

    1 Peter 2:11
    New King James Version (NKJV)

    Living Before the World

    11 Beloved, I beg you as sojourners and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts which war against the soul,

    Pretty amazing to me.

  7. oyboy Says:

    Even if the signers are dead, Isnt this agreement with states and federal government? still existing?

    Aren’t judges, police, people in certain office take an oath to uphold it? its considered treason to go against the constitution.

  8. Marc Stevens Says:

    No, all support is compulsory, there are no citizens, states etc.

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

Saturday, 4-7pm EST Oct 14 we're live from Living Tea Brewing Co in Oceanside, Calif 302 Wisconsin Ave join is for a blues jam after the show : Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via youtube.com. You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.





Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.






Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter


Advertise Here