Categorized | NSP Blog

Texas Robbery

Posted on March 9th, 2011 by Marc Stevens

This is the first call I’ve made to resolve a local extortion problem.  My friend Marciano is being threatened with an attack for not paying the local tribute.  This tends to really upset tyrants because they crave obedience.  Instead of just paying like a good obedient serf, Marciano decided to challenge the allegations being made against him.  Don’t forget, without the political PR, taxation is the forcible taking of property; government means never asking for permission.

Marciano had written several letters to the tax agency asking two basic questions: 1. Are there any witnesses with personal knowledge he is a taxpayer and 2. Is there any admissible evidence he’s a taxpayer.  Instead of answering the questions with a yes or no, he was sent documents showing he owned his property.  Not getting responsive answers, we decided we should call to resolve this matter.
We spoke to a Yolanda at the tax office and she stated the tax office does not make legal determinations people are taxpayers with tax obligations, the county appraisal office made those determinations.  This seemed odd, but we decided to call the appraisal office to confirm.  As I’ve said before, when you have a tax issue to resolve, you need to speak to two people, the one who made the allegations/accusations and the agent who can stop the attack.

We left a message for an appraiser to call and I got a call back from the chief appraiser, Mr. Rolando Garza on Friday March 4, 2011 at 9:11am.  The entire call is here, the only edits are Marciano’s last name and address.  Mr. Garza confirmed he was the one who made the legal determinations Marciano is a taxpayer with a tax obligation:
Marc: OK, but who’s making the determination he’s a taxpayer and has a tax obligation?  That’s who we’re interested in speaking with.  Somebody said, we got a delinquency notice from the tax department and they’re saying they’re not responsible for the legal determination that my client is a taxpayer, that that was done by someone here, so we’re trying to find out who at the appraisal district, and I know, I had spoken to somebody, an Orlando –
Garza: OK –
Marc: and he said that, what I already know –
Garza:  I make that decision sir.
Marc:  Oh you make the –
Garza: I am the chief- I make the decision – it rests on my shoulders –
Marc: that my client is a taxpayer?
Garza:  Yes sir.
Garza also stated: “I’ve made a determination, I have certified an appraisal roll and that’s my determination.  That it is taxable and that’s where it lies.”
Since Garza is making legal determinations effecting Marciano’s life, it’s reasonable to expect he’s qualified to interpret and apply the Texas constitution and law.  After all, he does it everyday and it directly effects thousands of people.  So naturally, I ask Garza about his qualifications because I think it’s silly, as well dangerous and irresponsible, to give an accuser a free pass:
Marc:  Well that’s why I’m asking you about, are you an expert in the interpretation and application of the Texas constitution and laws?
Garza:  I am the chief appraiser for Hidalgo county and I follow the Texas property tax code.
Marc:  OK, that’s not really an answer to my question – well – my question is –
Garza:  I’m not going to answer that question.
Once again, a tax agent making allegations effecting my client’s life, is adamant about not answering questions about his qualifications to do his job.  What’s the problem?  If it’s so easy to prove, with facts, someone is a taxpayer with a tax obligation, then why do the agents always refuse to discuss it?
They refuse to discuss facts and their qualifications to interpret and apply the constitution and law because there are no facts.  There are no facts to connect anyone to the constitution and laws.  Remember, I’ve never had an agent tell me what the constitution is factually, they tend to think it’s irrelevant.  Really?  Then why do they all insist the constitution is the basis of their power to tax?  Irrelevant, really?  Who’s buying that nonsense?
We have authority to tax you and your property, it’s not theft because the constitution authorizes us.

Really?  What is the constitution factually?

That’s irrelevant; and mind your own business.
They claim it’s irrelevant because they cannot tell you what it is and show any factual connection to us.  The opinion the constitution applies to us is arbitrary; or as they say in the legal profession: “vox et preterea nihil…Voice and nothing more; that is, nothing but wind.  See Mitchell v Hazen, 4 Conn 495.”  Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, page 1354.  They probably know they can’t prove a connection so they claim the constitution is irrelevant.  Strong argument; sounds like legalistic gibberish to me.  Yeah, pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!
I say challenge everything.  If someone accuses you of being a taxpayer, then ask them to prove it.  I’m not talking about violent revolt; only challenging their opinions instead of just obeying their commands.  Keep your focus on the man behind the curtain.  The constitution is just distraction; it diverts your attention away from the violence.  But it’s very much a sacred cow; any suggestion there’s no evidence to prove the constitution applies to anyone and the apologists will attack you as crazy and demand you move to Somalia.  Move to Somalia; now that’s a sophisticated argument proving the constitution applies.  Is that supposed to be evidence the constitution applies?  Can we use that to defeat a tax assessment?  I’m a taxpayer? That’s frivolous, if you don’t like it move to Somalia Mr. Garza.
You can argue it’s not Garza’s job or responsibility to discuss his qualifications.  Sorry, I don’t buy that and neither should anyone being attacked by people like Garza.  If someone accuses you of something, the burden is on them to prove it: “Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui nega…The burden of proof is upon him who alleges, not upon him who denies.  Patterson v Gaines (US) 6 How 550…”  Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, page 392.  Why not take a few minutes and present the evidence Garza relies on?  Simple; there’s no evidence and there can’t be.  They are willing to take your property by force but not willing to discuss the facts supporting their legal opinions.   What does that tell you about them?
And what makes these bureaucrats so special or immune from questioning?  If you asked your doctor about his/her qualifications, he/she would tell you about their years of study and medical school.  Honest people who respect others have no problem being upfront and forthright; when asked to verify an opinion/allegation, they do it.  Ask them about their qualifications and they’ll tell you.
Bureaucrats/politicians are not honest; they only enjoy their positions because of coercion; we’re forced to support them or suffer severe punishment.  I encourage everyone to challenge these allegations/opinions; demand that before you give them a dime, they prove their allegations are true.  This is being a mature, responsible adult.  It’s time to stop giving lip service to concepts such as freedom and liberty and start living it.  We see in the news everyday the destruction to society because so many people permit governments to exist; the least we can do is to ask these bureaucrats to verify their opinions/allegations, before we give them part of our lives.

4 Comments For This Post

  1. Corey Says:


    I just posted a video about my success in court by appearing without entering a plea (I never appeared in court personally, only via documents).

    I am curious what you think about this theory, that the birth certificate is a franchise of the the federal corporation (Hence, the California Franchise Tax Board name would make sense). If you identify yourself as the person on the birth certificate with the lowest possible title in society (first name, last name, illegitimate child of parent corporations) that gives them the authority to tax your income without violating the constitution.

    If you can beat traffic tickets, you have the foundation for nearly everything else.


  2. oooorgle Says:

    Marc, the “entire call is here” link above doesn’t work.

  3. Paul Says:

    Yep, the “entire call is here” link is still not working. Can you fix it so we can all listen and learn from it? Thanks!

  4. Calvin Says:

    Fixed. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and he can add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.

Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.

Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter

Advertise Here