Categorized | NSP Radio Archive

NSP – Feb 23, 2013 – Co-host: Calvin

Posted on February 24th, 2013 by Calvin

Co-host: Calvin [@YouTube].

Show Notes:

  • NSP simulcasts and new AiLL “Success Stories” section of the website.
  • The meaning of the phrase “damage control” within the context of legal land.
  • Why it is more effective to ask questions rather than taking a position by bringing your own theory (BYOT) to court.
  • Non-laywer’s performance versus STATE-sanctioned attorneys.
  • Building an objective, accurate, clear picture of the bureaucratic attack/threat you are defending yourself against and legal tools to help leverage your success rate.
  • AiLL critics backhandedly attacking the most proven tool for seeking truth; the scientific method.
  • Maintaining the burden-of-proof on the one who is making the accusation.
  • The essential role of cross-examination of witnesses.
  • Using cross-examination techniques on the phone with the prosecutor during the pretrial discovery phase of litigation.
  • New #CoS: logically checking irrational, non-responsive statements from a CAFTB agent.
  • Challenging the competency of the witness by questioning them on the facts, compromising their testimony as a qualified, credible witness.
  • Marc’s “method” vs the Freeman/UCC/corporate-strawman method: completely opposite.
  • Including role-playing workshops as part of your your legal preparation to effectively navigate court.
  • Bill’s NHES hearing and his excellence in objecting when the prosecutor fails to provide evidence.
  • Government’s information hoarding in a supposedly “free and open society.”
  • The real victim and perpetrator in bureaucratic attacks.
  • Ramblings of the insane: “We are all members of the bar, if you disqualify all of us, then you disqualify none of us.”
  • The judge is the only expert on the application and interpretation of the law.
  • Cutting your nose despite your face: the prosecution stated jurisdiction, applicability of the code, and presence withing the STATE were all considered “off the table.”
  • Using a whiteboard in court to help keep score.
  • STATE call-monitoring/surveillance.
  • Lawyers conflating opinion and facts with relevant evidence to the issue(s) raised.
  • Unfair treatment towards those who raise the issue of jurisdiction without a bar card.
  • Finding the gatekeeper agent that can stop an assessment and providing them the grounds to issue a temporary hold until certain facts are disclosed.
  • A presumption of correctness, that is supposed to be based on facts, CAN be challenged.
  • The assessment is that “you are a taxpayer with taxable income within their jurisdiction and that you have a liability to pay;” not the report.
  • Recognizing the value in early deescalation procedure in litigation to prevent an escalation from lengthy aggressive bureaucratic attacks.
  • When to motion for dismissal on the fly when there’s a lack of evidence.
  • Asking the prosecution if they are sure they are ready to take their blow-off (non-)responses to court.
  • Martin Jenkins with the NH Labor Board claims that the LAW is universal and applies to everyone; “compulsory is the only operative fact.”
  • Keeping the prosecutor’s discovery specific to the issues that you raise about their lack of evidence.
  • Amateur psychic bureaucrats presuming the acceptance or nonacceptance of facts before presenting the facts.
  • Defending yourself versus representing yourself in court.
  • Using a Brady request.
  • James’ offer for anyone who donates $75 to Marc’s site will receive a BarryCam.
  • Being “untouchable,” Lanny Breuer style.
  • Due process and justice.

Caller’s Topics:

  • Phil from SC: the presumption of correctness, and psych evaluations for incessantly pursuing bogus theories in court.
  • Jim from MO: traveling without permission, playing the name game in court, challenging presumed authority, belief in duties and responsibilities to your fellow man, and being associated with the sovereign-citizen movement by law enforcement.
  • Richard from TX: prosecutor and court reporter failed to appear for a scheduled hearing, judge excising severe discretion on essential facts to a case, maintaining a good rapport with the court, dealing with prosecutors that specialize in neutralizing pro per litigants.
  • James from UT: extraordinary procedure in Wyoming traffic courts.
  • Eric from NJ: blatant denial of service from the courts when questioning the evidence.
  • Jerome from MD: hearing scheduled for March 29th [media reps], and judge face-palming when asking for evidence.
  • Michael from MD: wiretapping laws versus self-surveillance, participating in the mid-week role-playing workshops on skype, and responding to a $20 parking ticket.
  • Pete from WI: responding to a violation for not having a life-jacket in a canoe, when to object to assumptions of facts not in evidence, adding an amendment to a filed motion, factually challenging taxation while using the courts for bankruptcy, and raising speedy trial issues for dismissal.

0 Comments For This Post

4 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Make a Bureaucrat Run – Just Ask Them for the Facts | Says:

    […] prosecutor called me yesterday, 1 March 2013 regarding a speeding ticket James called the No State Project about last week.  This one ends fast also, though not at the breakneck speed of the IRS call.  […]

  2. Make a Bureaucrat Run – Just Ask Them for the Facts - Unofficial Network Says:

    […] prosecutor called me yesterday, 1 March 2013 regarding a speeding ticket James called the No State Project about last week.  This one ends fast also, though not at the breakneck speed of the IRS call.  […]

  3. NSP - Feb 21, 2015 - Says:

    […] bizarre calls with the junior psychopath Martin […]

  4. NSP - July 4, 2015 - [DRAFT VERSION] - Says:

    […] Eric from NJ: failed use of UCC/strawman theory in court <> the success of utilizing “zen and the art of litigation” <> the I.R.S.’s debunking of frivolous tax arguments which include UCC/strawman arguments <> […]

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.

Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.

Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter

Advertise Here