Categorized | NSP Radio Archive

NSP – Oct 26, 2013 – Co-host: JT

Posted on October 26th, 2013 by Calvin

Co-host: JT.

Show Notes:

  • How to participate with the No STATE Project community and during the live broadcast.
  • Canadian psychopaths pushing tolerance levels by playing stupid when questioned on facts and evidence: the agent claims they are not trying to take someone’s property by executing a writ of seizure without examining their [lack of] evidence.
  • Many judges self-insure to control the processing of claims against them and avoid scrutiny from any third-parties.
  • Update on Marc’s complaint he filed against the lying married couple Doug Shea and Susan Hinkle: the insurance company “does not care” to hear complaints of misconduct unless there is a formal complaint filed into the supreme court.
  • Getting cases of judicial and prosecutorial misconduct reported on and disseminated to the public.
  • Pre-orders for Government: Indicted are just around the corner.
  • Calling out the obvious insurance fraud if judges are ultimately immune from being held accountable for their misconduct via their insurance policies.
  • Demonstrating the obvious criminal collusion [A.K.A.: conflict-of-interest] and multiple misconduct violations of judges and prosecutors to their insurers.
  • When an attorney has a complaint filed against them with the bar association, they are required to provide notice to the insurance company, whether it goes anywhere or not.
  • Seeking accountability, via insurance policies, despite the gross criminal nature of STATE court systems by using, “sometimes magical,” tort letters.
  • THEY don’t care about you.
  • Yet more proof of conflict-of-interest between the judge and prosecutor: judges gets caught texting the prosecutor during hearings.
  • Asking if a voluntary signature is required for the court to proceed.
  • Reminding the court that you are not a submitizen and of res nullius.
  • Proper use of ethnic slang and slur.
  • The cops and courts are not using your name in any contractual sense.
  • Responding to attorneys that dodge raised issues by vaguely deeming the question(s) “gibberish.”
  • Lawyers have now deemed that “any restraint of your liberty” is only limited to being jailed or physically restrained.
  • The double-standard with recording equipment and cell-phones in the courtroom.
  • Judges that can just walk away from felony violations of due process.
  • Adam got his public intoxication citation kicked because a lack of evidence.
  • Marc’s email correspondence with Sgt. Mark in Adam’s case.
  • The ole bureaucratic dodge of conflating a question of evidence as a “debate.”
  • The bureaucrat Mark Clark mistakes Marc is a FMOTL.
  • There is no evidence that there has ever been a legitimate government.
  • Governments are just people, not corporations that are trying to contract with you. [do not get tricked into using their Orwellian use of language that obfuscates who and what They really are.]
  • Chris Lianos’ now infamous line “I’ll be the last friendly face you’ll see.”
  • The Force Continuum: the fact that there is force behind taxation negates any presumption that there’s any legitimate requirement.
  • Treat all your communication as cross-examination, use leading questions and include the answer within the question. 😉
  • Chris Lianos’ apology to Marc for his conduct.
  • Not every bureaucrat is an irredeemable psychopath, so remember to treat them as you would want be treated.
  • Stumping bureaucrats with simple questions of evidence.
  • Anything they CAN use to discredit you, They will.

Caller’s Topics:

  • John from MN: how do we get these psychopaths to seriously pay attention to us? <~> tracking down the bureaucrat’s insurance policies to file claims for damages bureaucrats inflict upon their victims <~> bringing the issues of judicial and prosecutorial misconduct to risk management <~> past successes in pushing back the aggression of the STATE <~> WHY insurers would have to respond if it were discovered there was a “high-risk situation” in accordance with their policy statement <~> and the conditions of which an attorney is unbondable.
  • Jay from VA: held in contempt for missing jury duty due to a medical situation <~> and signing documents under duress when you are forced to sign despite not understanding the nature and cause of the proceedings.
  • Barry from NJ: sister is being charged with a misdemeanor for possessing a pill without turning it in to the proper authorities <~> avoiding the use of your NAME as a contract <~> judges throwing trumped out charges and jurisdiction shuffling at the defendant victim to avoid the daunting task of hearing a pro per case <~> sister was arrested in the courtroom for contempt after exposing the court had no jurisdiction and that she was just going to leave if they couldn’t prove jurisdiction and jailed for 10 days <~> judges denying paperwork out-of-hand on the vague grounds that its “gibberish” and that the defendant is a “terrorist<~> getting a plan for proceeding worked out for the next hearing <~> and being cited with a failure to appear for a court date because another judge had jailed the defendant.
  • Vin James from England: fair caution in using FMOTL-type legal defenses that have proven to be less fruitful than simply asking Them for Their evidence <~> adventures in cleaning up a FMOTL legal-mess <~> deceptive attorneys changing the terms of the real issues being raised <~> NSP Reloaded & NSP UK Edition <~> Saturday’s NSP radio show is streamed live at Awake Radio <~> discussing the coercive nature of taxation with bureaucrats <~> and the court solely focused on a “fee schedule” Vin’s friend imposed for a “special interview” when the case went to trial and They dodged all the other real issues.

Meta-content Credits:

              

43 Comments For This Post

  1. Warren Mclachlan Says:

    Hello Marc !

    THE DARK SIDE OF FINLAND

    * * * How Would You Like It ? * * *

    (1) How Would You Like It If :
    More than a decade ago, your Wife took your three year old Son and your unborn Son to the other side of the World to visit her Family , then refused to return Home and divorced you ?

    (2) How Would You Like It If :
    The next thing your ex wife did was to prove herself unwilling or unfit to care for your Children , and surrender them to the State ?

    (3) How Would You Like It If :
    That same Foreign State then not only refused to return your Children to their own Country & Father , but also refused your second Request , namely – that your Children be placed in the Care of the closest possible of their many Family Members who live in that same State ?

    (4) How Would You Like It If :
    That same Foreign State then separated your Children from each other , placing the younger one in a foster home and the older one in a government home ?

    (5) How Would You Like It If :
    The more your older Son became disturbed by the above , the more the government home drugged him , and the more they drugged him the more disturbed he became ?

    (6) How Would You Like It If :
    Your older son was moved to a new government home , deep in the Forest , many hundreds of kilometres away from his Brother and mother – where those running the home hang up on you if you ask to speak to you Son ?

    (7) How Would You Like It If :
    those “caring” for your older Son subjected him to extra Social and Physical and Chemical Punishment if he dared to communicate to you ?

    (8) How Would You Like It If :
    You had a Court Order from that same State guaranteeing you Custody of your Children one month per year in that State , but , in reality , for more than a decade , during your visits to that State , you had only been allowed to see your Children for an average of two hours twice a week , with a government employee watching you – and restricting your speech all the time ?

    (9) How Would You Like It If :
    Those “caring” for your Children had denied you twice in Writing , the Right to send a Doctor ; Lawyer ; Priest ; Human Rights Activist or Private Detective of your own choice to visit your own Children ?

    (10) How Would You Like It If :
    (a) For more than one decade you had contacted thousands of Justice Department Employees of that same Foreign State (b)Warned them that it was the Intention of certain employees of the Health & Welfare Departments of that same Foreign State to (C) Institutionalise and Drug and Brutalize your Children for The Term Of Their Natural Lives and (D) despite this Warning becoming increasingly obviously accurate not one of them had helped your Children in any way ?
    —–
    CREDIBILITY

    To those who find it hard to believe the above , I say two things :

    (1) That is exactly how they get away with it !

    (2) Please have an honest look at the following Evidence !
    —–
    EVIDENCE

    My free Internet Book :

    [3800 Views – Finland 1322]
    * If the above Link is corrupted , simply search – darksideoffinland .

    My Petition :

    [124 Signatures]
    * In case of the above Link being corrupted , I have been unable to create a search that brings it to view – could someone help please ?

    My Radio Interview :

    * In case of the above Link being corrupted , simply search – redice-darksideoffinland .
    —–
    HOW YOU CAN HELP

    (A) I f you can find sufficient Truth in my Evidence : buy my Book or donate or sign my Petition – or all of the above !

    (B) Pass my Message along to Friends ; Media ; Human Rights Groups ; Lawyers ; Justice Officials ; Politicians , etc .

    (C) Provide Proffessional Assistance .
    —–
    Paljon kiitos (thank you very much) .

    Yours truly ,
    Warren Mclachlan
    Email –

    Twitter –
    @MclachlanWW
    Facebook –
    Warren William Mclachlan
    —–
    P..S – I found a Cartoon on the Internet , it tells a Story similar to what is happening to my Children , I hope you like it as much as I do !

    —–
    P.P.S – There is no way in Hell the Finnish Government could behave like this if millions of Finnish People knew it was True .
    Please help me spread this Message to the People of Finland or the People of your own Country – International Pressure also works well on the Finnish Government !

  2. NonE Says:

    How would you like it if someone posted a huge comment on your site which was completely out of the context of the site?

    How would you like it if this person did that again, shortly after the first time, in another location, one which also was completely out of context with the material at hand?

    I have very mixed feelings on this as it appears you have gotten involved in a horrific situation, one which strains the ability of any thoughtful human being to accept as real. I sense your anger and frustration, and your probable sense of complete impotence to find any resolution via all of the means you’ve attempted.

    At the same time I feel that in your anger perhaps you are lashing out and wanting others to suffer as you have in some sort of sense of retribution for the injustice. I say this by the continued phrasing of “How would you feel if…” statements.

    I’m sorry for your loss and your anguish. But this is not the place. I apologize if I have misread you or implied anything incorrectly. I wish you well with this situation, however that may come to be for you. I can’t imagine being in your shoes.

    – NonE

  3. UkTony Says:

    NONE in an apparently FREE AND DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY, where all are equal under the apparent LAW. Everyone has the right to ASK QUESTIONS AND TO QUESTION EVERYTHING. Otherwise NONE this is not a DEMOCRACY it’s actually SLAVERY.
    NONE as you’ll be aware I’m from the UK, but I do now understand I AM A SLAVE. But you thought that, well it seems, that the negro’s were the only slaves in your country, it seems that’s not true NONE.
    And I truly apologise to any African Americas reading this, the term above, was only used in that context, as to provide credence to the point I was making. I find the persecution of any man what ever the colour of his skin disgusting. But as I am a white Caucasian and my history is guilty of this disgusting act, I used it in the context of historical reference, I apologise for any offence to anyone.

  4. NonE Says:

    UKTony, I am sorry, but I have no clue that to which you refer. I appears to me that you must have found something that I said offensive, but I don’t know what it was and you are not making it clear what you find offensive. If you think that I believe that we are not slaves to the government then you have mistaken me somehow. I must say, however, that I do not consider “democracy” as any sort of freedom, rather it is the enslavement of the minority by the majority and is completely loathsome, in my perspective. Government is a criminal enterprise, period. Aggressive force is evil. Period. So, if you wouldn’t mind, can you please tell me exactly what it is I’v said that you have perceived as hateful so that I can properly reply? Thanks – NonE

  5. NonE Says:

    UKTony, let me add that perhaps this post of yours, above, is not related to this web page at all and is based upon something I said somewhere else. If so, may I suggest, as Marc most certainly would like, that this discussion be moved over to the forum where it can have a thread of its own to reside in and retain some kind of coherency.

    – NonE

  6. UKTony Says:

    Your correct NONE sorry, I do apologise. I posted an earlier post, as you yourself are aware, you have multiple emails. I guess so for certain business as they call it interactions. I kind of got distracted and posted on the wrong email. Therefore the original post will not have been posted.
    I can only apologise for this, my mistake NONE.
    I will rectify this and repost my original post, it relates to an FBI article about sovereignty. You may want to give it a read, it seems you and your government friends are rather worried about the knowledge the slave nation has. And NONE if there’s one thing I do understand I am a slave.
    But I will repost my quote so as you can be sure I understand why as a White Caucasian I understand I am a slave, even you feel you can in some paradigm mindset of your own believe your not. But if your taking there silver, then again your just a slave keeping the rest of the slaves in check.
    But I will repost NONE. Sorry about the confusion, that was my mistake.
    By the way no NONE I have never found anything you have said offensive, like I’ve said your a very interesting human being, although sometimes your means of tackling a subject by just berating the speaker is somewhat infantile, you still are like I say a very knowledgable human being and most of the time put your point across very eloquently, but then again you are who you are, just like the rest of us a human being and that’s what I think we all need to understand. Nobody here wants bedlam and an unruly society, all any wants is to be allowed to get on with there lives without oppression, without persecution, without men in uniforms being given the right to kill, when to kill in any way shape or form is wrong, without bearing the burden of greedy men’s follies. I do understand there has to be order but for me to be told,” I am to physically hurt nobody “. And unless in self defence I wouldn’t. But then watch people who put a uniform on and can kill people legally, without no recourse is insane. This as an intelligent person you know is not right, this isn’t a way a civilised society should work. How can a double standard and logical fallacy ever be portrayed as normal human interaction.
    It’s called slavery NONE nothing more, nothing less my friend. A man killing a man, is a man killing a man, there’s nothing normal about this interaction, it’s murder and murder is murder is murder.
    No man has the right to take anyone’s life unless in self defence.

  7. Incubus Says:

    “…you and your government friends…”

    Wait, NonE has friends?!

    Now I KNOW this guy is full of baloney. Tony Baloney!

  8. NonE Says:

    UkTony, Dude, I think you are seriously confused. Where you could possibly have gotten the notion that I am part of the government, or that I support them, well I find it ludicrous! Did you not read in my last post that I considered government to be CRIMINAL???

    I will be looking forward to your post and explanation as it seems that you not only live on a different island than I, but perhaps an entirely different reality! 😉 PLEASE post on the forum and NOT HERE!!!

    – the Very Good NonE (I couldn’t resist! Thanks Notavoter. 🙂 )

  9. NonE Says:

    Incubus,

    Indeed!!! 😉

    – NonE

  10. UKTony Says:

    This was my original post NONE:
    http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/law-enforcement-bulletin/september-2011/sovereign-citizens

    Sovereign Citizens
    A Growing Domestic Threat to Law Enforcement
    By the FBI’s Counterterrorism Analysis Section

    Now NONE I would like you to read this government PROPAGANDA, it’s an outstanding piece of work. I myself lost count after the second paragraph, of the amount of logical fallacies and ambiguous lies the writers of this PROPAGANDA had written. Apparently we train to commit fraud, unfortunately we all know the only perpetrators of fraud are the BANKS themselves. As well you know, this is an actually factual statement. The BANKS defraud customers by misrepresentation, concealment and by false accountancy, yet apparently knowing this and questioning the BANKS about this fraudulent behaviour, is in itself seen as fraudulent and the defrauding of a corporation.
    So by actually knowing you are being defrauded, in the mindset of the FBI NONE is apparently a fraudulent act. Somehow this seems, well I’d like your opinion NONE, apparently the knowing of the TRUTH, is to the FBI a criminal act, so NONE who are the criminals. Apparently just informing people about helpful paperwork to stop this fraudulent practice by the BANKS, is in itself, DOMESTIC TERRORISM, this is not a way a democratic society should work, in fact this is not democracy this is oppressive slavery. Hitler burnt books NONE, he tried to subvert information, is this democracy, please give me your thoughts.
    They talk about government control again, this is slavery, they even lie about the FACT that all governments are bankrupt, which as we all know, is the TRUTH. We all use debt notes, were as the liberty dollar, when actually sold to the buyer, actually inflated in value after time, the lies are beyond reproach. They actually have the audacity to state that the sovereign man says, the government doesn’t work for the best interests of the citizens. Has it not been stated in court ” the police do not have a duty to protect the public “. Again the PROPAGANDA is unbelievable. The courts themselves have made that statement. These are the statements of very worried and scared people, your friends are truly, truly worried.
    But NONE has anyone ever, on any of these so called DOMESTIC TERRORIST SITES, vindicated the use of violence to bring the TRUTH to the fore, no NONE, although the use of words, has been used to define the government employees, they are words used, that if the definition was sought, actually explains them, quite subsinctly. As they portray anarchists, but when the definition is sought there portrayal and the definition are miles apart. It’s actually beyond belief they talk about red crayons the old ad irridendum fallacy, they use the old ad Verecundiam fallacy as well. It’s beyond belief, that the FBI are actually criminalising people for actually knowing the TRUTH. Well NONE this is American and British Democracy, the elite control freaks are running scared. Now NONE,no one, on these sites wants bedlam and chaos, all of us know what’s wrong and what’s right NONE. No one wants an unruly society, but TRUTH IS TRUTH IS TRUTH.
    Is it not the fact NONE if the statement is quoted ” IS AUTHORITY THE TRUTH, OR IS THE TRUTH AUTHORITY “, the LATTER is the TRUE. This is why NONE I understand I am a slave, because the powerful elite believe, with the use of a brainwashed force, they can subvert the TRUTH, as hitler tried. But unfortunately the problem for elite now is, they cannot stop this information revolution, they have no control over this informative peaceful revolution. The BANKS cannot stop this peaceful information sharing revolution, all the money in the world, even though they actually have no money, it’s just digits on computer screens, could stop the flow of this information. There fever for the NEW WORLD ORDER GLOBALISATION is going to be there own downfall. Although America has tried to put all it’s citizens in prison, it cannot stop what is happening, the rolling stone is gathering no moss NONE. You and your government friends have wrote there own obituary. Slowly day by day year by year, even if it’s one by one, the TRUTH MOVEMENT will win, because everyday you and your government friends, persecute the people who financially support you and your governments abusive cruelty. There can be only one outcome, it is all working against those that fill the coffers,
    Welcome to the empowerment by information of all slave nations NONE !!!!

  11. NonE Says:

    UkTony,

    Dude, I will no longer converse with you here. If you want to have a conversation, create a thread on the forum.

    – NonE

  12. NonE Says:

    By the way, I’m curious as to this UKTony persona. I see posts made by “him” in the form of UkTony and UKTony, apparently two different logins (no messinas) for the same apparent “person.” Whutzis mean? I think maybe someone is trying to game someone else, or something, or something, or…

    – NonE

  13. NonE Says:

    Hmm. It’s not Wednesday yet, is it?

  14. UKTony Says:

    Although your interesting NONE, I think your cover has been blown. The only person on this site that games people NONE, is yourself. Like I said in my very first post, ” I do wonder which government agency you actually work for “. Not that I care, but it does intrigue me, why such a knowledgable and intelligent human as you are !! Would spend so much time trying to dispel FACTS and the distribution of TRUTH. Like I’ve said NONE if just the practice of sharing informative truthful information peacefully, constitutes TERRORISM then hell NONE, It kind of tears apart the fabric of the JUSTICE SYSTEM. That apparently all men are equal under and purports to be built on TRUTH AND JUSTICE.
    Sounds like the best oxymoron I’ve ever come across NONE.
    I think you and your government friends have dug themselves a rather big hole, I think someone should take shovels away. The hole could get to deep, maybe for me after reading that article the hole is actually to deep now. The TRUTH IS TRUTH NONE. PROPAGANDA IS PROPAGANDA.
    Peace and love NONE peace and love x

  15. staljans Says:

    re; UKtony says;Sounds like the best oxymoron I’ve ever come across NONE.

    first, maybe i could ask you this UKTony, “are you OKTony?”,
    second FREEDUmb and DEMOCRACY , in the same sentence IS an OXYMORON , do? morons say oxymorons knowingly ?,
    3rd, sounds like Uktony/uOKtony/UKTONY/PERSON and or any other derivative, is trying to start a fight, if trying to show who the real shill is ?, we require the evidence, and nothing but the evidence.
    eh? wha u really say manh? wha up w jU, ?eh?

  16. NonE Says:

    Question of the day: Is a really “slow” person with free radicals an oxymoron? How about if the radicals are only inexpensive? It isn’t Wednesday yet, is it?

  17. UKTony Says:

    Oh dear no fight here folks, all I’ve stated is my intrigue in why a highly educated person, spends so much time here, trying to dispel factual information. All I asked the said person to do, was give his highly intellectual views on the, stated FBI propaganda.
    All I asked is for the said person what his thoughts were. It’s just my personal thoughts that written out aloud when stating, ” I do wonder what government agency the said person works for “.
    Now I can only apologise and do if anyone has been offended, this was not my intention. But as I said after reading weeks and weeks of the said persons ” game playing ” posts, his quote not mine !!
    I simply asked his opinions on THE FBI’s stand, personally I can only say, the said person although very highly intelligent is an agitator. I do apologise if this has upset anyone, I myself seek truthful and informative information, that shows how the masses are habitually lied to, as I’ve also said I understand my slave status, but this status in no way, will hinder my own personal quest for truthful and informative knowledge.
    As I’ve also earlier quoted: IS AUTHORITY THE TRUTH, OR IS THE TRUTH AUTHORITY.
    You can call me a dumb ass, you can call me, well any names you feel, may make you feel better.
    But all I’ve asked is for a very intellectual person, who as I have stated I do respect, as a human and does have valid points. To give his opinions on the FBI’s PROPAGANDA, if this offends anyone again I apologise, this was not my intention to offend, so I would be very grateful if you could keep your personal attacks against me, to yourselves.
    As I see personal attacks, as a defensive mechanism when, let’s say ” a raw nerve has been touched ” peace and love to all and apologies to any that have been offended.

  18. eddie moses Says:

    EXCLUSIVE: Adam Kokesh, A Modern Day Political Prisoner?
    3 hours ago | Interviews, Politics, US | Posted by Kristin Tate

    October 29, 2013

    160

    Libertarian activist Adam Kokesh has been in jail for 114 days (92 of which he was held by the feds) with no bond, no bail, and no trial. 57 of those days were in solitary confinement.

    Clearly, this Kokesh fellow is a dangerous threat to society… Right?

    Nonsense, say many of those who know Kokesh well. In fact, they argue that Adam Kokesh is anything but dangerous.

    Let’s start with the facts: On July 4, Kokesh uploaded a video of himself loading a shotgun in Freedom Plaza in the District of Columbia. With the Capital building behind him, the activist said as he loaded his firearm, “We will not be silent; we will not obey; we will not allow our government to destroy our humanity. We are the final American Revolution. See you next Independence Day.”

    D.C. gun laws are some of the strictest in the U.S. As reported by ABC News, “The District has a litany of laws on the books that make it more difficult to obtain some firearms, impossible to obtain others, and illegal to carry any loaded gun in the city.” Just being in D.C. with a loaded firearm, even if it is legally registered, is a violation of the law. D.C. laws also ban gun owners from carrying firearms openly or concealed in public.

    On July 9, not even a week after producing and uploading his video, Kokesh’s home was raided by a SWAT team.

    Jeffrey Phillips, Kokesh’s manager, said, “Five different government agencies came to Adam’s home. They had several helicopters, something like 30 police units. They flash banged his house.”

    Carey Wedler, Kokesh’s girlfriend, was at his home at the time of the raid. She was in the shower when it began.

    “I was washing my hair in the shower when I heard Adam scream, ‘The police are here!’ I threw a skirt on and left the bathroom… there was smoke everywhere because [officers] had thrown a flash grenade,” she said. “I walked to the top of the stairs. They pointed guns at me and told me to put my hands up. Cops were streaming into the house and you could hear helicopters above.”

    The next few hours were a hellish daze for Wedler, Kokesh, and his six employees who were also in the home during the raid.

    Wedler said, “There were about eight of us total. Activists would come stay with him, and he would give them free rent in exchange for work. The officers cuffed us — we kept asking why they were arresting us and they wouldn’t answer. Adam kept asking for a warrant and they refused to show it.”

    The cuffed group was forced to the ground for hours as the raid took place.

    “Most of the cops covered up their badges. It was so shady,” Wedler said.

    She also recalls how harshly the cops treated them. “One of our guys had his cell phone and was trying to record what was happening. Some of the cops noticed, pushed me out of the way, then punched the guy in the head,” she said. “At another point Adam asked to use the restroom and he got kicked.”

    Wedler had asked to use the restroom repeatedly throughout the incident — it was “that time of month” for her. After asking officers if she could go to the bathroom several times an “officer told me a female officer was coming to escort me to the restroom. She never came. Out of 30 police officers there, not one was a woman.”

    Finally, after several hours, some male officers took her to the upstairs bathroom. “Blood was dripping down my leg. All these male officers were watching me,” she said.

    Officers claimed they found drugs in Kokesh’s home during the raid (“magic mushrooms”). The activist was arrested for possession of an illegal drug, and possession of an illegal drug while in possession of a firearm. The officers finally showed a warrant as Kokesh was being taken outside and put into a cruiser.

    1011993_10151488814296260_1085902472_n 1069807_10151488815556260_1859604699_n 988625_10151488820911260_119408301_n 1012225_10151488811891260_1732066085_n
    Ads by Freecorder. More Info | Hide These Ads

    Wedler vehemently insists that Kokesh never used “shrooms.” She said, “I know that Adam doesn’t do shrooms. I can say, whatever they found, I never saw it in Adam’s house.”

    Wedler claims she and her group watched officers carrying brown bags “full of matter” into the basement before emerging with the illegal drugs. “Officers kept coming in and out of the basement. We literally watched some of them carrying brown ‘evidence bags’ with matter in them down into the basement.”

    Phillips, who was not present during the raid, said the situation is “very odd.” He said, “The month previously Adam was arrested twice and got off because the state didn’t have a good enough case. The police hate him. This time, they knew they had to get him on something. So it is very likely that they actually planted mushrooms on him. When Adam made the D.C. video, he expected attention from police. We knew police were coming, so why would we leave drugs out? We had actually done a clean of the whole house because we expected police to show up.”

    He also mentioned that “Adam has never even spoken about, nor does he like mushrooms.”

    Wedler said that Kokesh’s house was left completely destroyed after the raid. Here are some images of the home after the police cleared out at 1am:

    Kokesh’s story, which was already unusual enough, took another strange turn last week.

    On Wednesday, his attorney, Peter Cooper, quit the case without giving a reason. Those close to Kokesh are shocked.

    “Cooper is a buddy of Adam and represents him whenever he gets in D.C. trouble,” said Phillips. “There’s no reason for him to just leave other than [the feds] got to him. He was scared away by the government basically. The court appointed Adam a new lawyer who has no idea what he is getting himself into. They obviously do not want him to have a good lawyer, and we had a good lawyer.”

    Wedler said, “I imagine we’ll find out why Cooper left later, but for now they can’t discuss it.”

    Still, what frustrates both Wedler and Phillips more than anything is how harsh the police have been while dealing with Kokesh’s case.

    Phillips said, “If you went to D.C. and shot someone, you’d probably get bail. They didn’t give Adam bail — and he didn’t threaten anyone or hurt anyone. He was only making a political statement.”

    “While everyone may not agree with Adam’s way of doing things, he is and has always been very peaceful. He has never been a dangerous person,” said Wedler.

    “As strong as Adam is, I talked to him yesterday and he didn’t sound very good,” said Phillips. “They could keep him for ten years if they wanted to. And they will — they want him out of the picture. They don’t have to explain themselves to anybody. They can do whatever they want.”

    He concluded, “Adam is a modern day political prisoner. And we’re not supposed to have political prisoners in this country.”

  19. UKTony Says:

    And without being rude and sounding patronising. The oxymoron referred to was that apparently now by terms prescribed in the FBI’s article is ” TO NOW TEACH AND INFORM THE TRUTH, IS TO TEACH AND INFORM A LIE “, so if quoting a contradictory oxymoron makes me a quote ” DUMB ASS ” well that’s me sir, an English DUMB ASS
    I can only apologise for my stupidity sir.
    Peace and love my friend peace and love x x

  20. UKTony Says:

    ox•y•mo•ron (ˌɒk sɪˈmɔr ɒn, -ˈmoʊr-)
    n., pl. -mo•ra (-ˈmɔr ə, -ˈmoʊr ə)
    A figure of speech that uses seeming contradictions, as “cruel kindness” or “to make haste slowly.”
    Just so you actually understand what an oxymoron is, sorry now I am sounding patronising. I do apologise sir.

  21. Eyal Says:

    I heard it was a great show this week! (and I’m waiting for the full version to listen…)

  22. Incubus Says:

    “…makes me a quote ‘ DUMB ASS ‘ well that’s me sir, an English DUMB ASS.”

    As far as I can tell no one ever called you a dumbass. Who exactly are you quoting?

    staljans was pointing out that freedom and democracy are polar opposites. Democracy is just another form of slavery.

    “…so if quoting a contradictory oxymoron…”

    Isn’t that redundant? An oxymoron that contradicts…isn’t that what they already do? I think my heads going to explode!

  23. UKTony Says:

    staljans Says:
    October 29th, 2013 at 12:32 am
    re; UKtony says;Sounds like the best oxymoron I’ve ever come across NONE.

    first, maybe i could ask you this UKTony, “are you OKTony?”,
    second FREEDUmb and DEMOCRACY , in the same sentence IS an OXYMORON , do? morons say oxymorons knowingly ?,
    3rd, sounds like Uktony/uOKtony/UKTONY/PERSON and or any other derivative, is trying to start a fight, if trying to show who the real shill is ?, we require the evidence, and nothing but the evidence.
    eh? wha u really say manh? wha up w jU, ?eh?

    . Incubus he didn’t use the word ass. But I placed it in post, again probably not a thing I should have done. But as you can see Incubus the DUmb was placed into his post in a disparaging context, so in riposte I added the ass.
    Now the actual oxymoron in question is that the FBI now say you are a DOMESTIC TERRORIST if :
    You tell someone a some factual information, example; when you sign a credit agreement you loan yourself the money, they never lend you a single penny, you create the commercial instrument ( prommisory note ), which they then sell. !!!
    Although this is factually ” TRUE ” the FBI say it’s a lie
    It’s an oxymoron, also the JUSTICE SYSTEM hinges on TRUTH, yet it is a complete LIE.
    It’s an oxymoron, if I’m a moron , I’m a moron, I feel placing the ass into my post was quite polite considering the nonsense the above wrote.
    Again sorry if I’ve offended anyone it was not my intention, I have been very polite and considerate in my posts. I wish the same could be said for some that have responded, but it’s no mither to me, I am honest about what write, I refrain from insulting people, unless insulted and then it’s kept to a very bare minimum if I am condescending.
    Peace and love to all xxx

  24. NonE Says:

    Damn… it’s WEDNESDAY!!!! 🙂

    – NonOKdokay

  25. NonE Says:

    Calvin, Once again, many thanks. I can see that you’ve decided to refrain from posting the podcast until AFTER Survivor, once again. I bow in humble supplication before your most generous spirit. I am not worthy. Not at all worthy! – NonE (Either that or you’re gonna put a costume and dripping blood on it and release it tomorrow. That would be WAY COOL, Dude! WAY!)

  26. NonE Says:

    Okay, so it’s to be blood and costumes is it? – NonE

  27. stalJANski Says:

    re; FREEDUmb and DEMOCRACY , in the same sentence IS an OXYMORON , do? morons say oxymorons knowingly ?,

    1st freedom vs freedumb…john Stuart calls them pay-try-idiots…I’m a bit less blunt.

    2nd I was talking about self, of being a moron…guess you did not get the joke(s)?

    3rd, if “our sig natures” create legal tender out of thin air?..did you NOT? sign a con tract?, agreeing to pay back that legal tender..even if you did not, at the time, know your signature/autograph made the legal tender?..to bad, city zen be aware, of contracts, read them first, and be honourable and pay back whatever you think you borrowed.

    4th are you OKtony?..my as KING of wondering if your going half cocked? and creating arguable, angry sounding, frivolous, nonsensical? comments/arguments, which makes people wonder what are you on?..why not just say what you mean to say..instead of wasting so much of our time arguing nothing???..if you want to argue, go into court, and argue with lier/lawyer/con sells/attorneys/judges ..why bring it here?..whats YOUR POINT? be specific..take a chill pill, and post RELEVant comments.

  28. indio007 Says:

    Marc,
    I just wanted to point out a slight error.
    You said (paraphrasing) in the broadcast that judge’s oath are basically not actionable.
    They is not correct.
    From:
    A practical treatise on abstracts and examinations of title to real property
    …under “Liens Charges and Encumbrances” there is a section for official bonds

    § 13. Official Bonds. A peculiar class of liens arises in many States from official bonds, which are declared to be liens on all the real estate held jointly or severally by the officers giving same, from the time of filing same until such officers shall have been honorably discharged from their trusts. These bonds are most frequently required from collectors of* taxes, and it would seem, that where any of the parties vendors named in the abstract, during the period in which an action may be brought on an official bond, have held this position, or have been a surety for any such officer, an examination should be made for liens of this nature. As the bonds are required to be filed or recorded in some of the designated public offices of the county, the files or records should be regularly inspected as often as occasion may require, and references obtained to the information thereby disclosed.

  29. Marc Stevens Says:

    @ indio, in practice judges gives oaths to no one. If you bring a complaint in court against a judge it will be kicked out because they have absolute immunity. I am not aware of any case where a judge has been stripped of absolute immunity. Most governments do not even maintain bonds, they self insure. If you have any information where a judge was stripped of his immunity let me know.

  30. indio007 Says:

    Oh ya. almost forgot, oaths are actionable via covenant as well.

  31. NonE Says:

    RIP Calvin DeWitt – it should be obvious now to anyone paying attention, Calvin has been eaten by Zombies. May he rest in peace. May his pieces rest in peace(s). – NonE

  32. UKTony Says:

    Be honest and pay the. Debt . LOL so I pay the corporation that used a lie to defraud me of money. Now forgive me here but, unfortunately this isn’t actually a victimless crime, this is actual fraud, by misrepresentation, by concealment, it’s also false accountancy. Now call me a fool I don’t care, but this is actually a crime, if there is such a legal concept, this is that concept. It is a crime, I didn’t defraud or set out to defraud, and you believe I should honour a contract that was based on fraud and deception. I think not, I think not and yes it’s took me a while to understand and realise the lie that are the BANKS.
    PEACE AND LOVE XXX

  33. UKTony Says:

    I’m fortunate unlike yourselves, my wages will not get garnished, I have nothing to lose and will never again take credit or sign a credit agreement, but don’t make out that you were actually calling yourself a moron.
    Your insult, save it, you’ve actually made more of a fool of yourself. But if you want people to think your a moron that’s your right.
    I don’t think your a moron. I don’t actually know you, so if you could keep your attacks bottled up, that would be nice.
    I don’t care if you don’t but just politely asking you to thanks xx
    Peace and love all xxxx

  34. UKTony Says:

    And just to take my view forward. Is this site not actually about the FACT. That the legal system is a complete SHAM, based on deceit, deception and lies. So would you actually politely explain to me. Why I shouldn’t dispute the fraud and deception that has been enacted upon my ” LEGAL FICTION “.
    That is the ” PERSON “. Which apparently is the citizen, that apparently the ” STATE HAS NO OBLIGATION TO RECIPROCATE WITH “. Am I missing the point here, or is it you that’s actually missing the point.
    Peace and love xxx

  35. UKTony Says:

    Apologies to all, sorry I told a white no my wages won’t get garnished, but I’ll lose my credit rating.
    SHIT. What will I do, I’ll tell you all what I’ll do never put another penny into a BANK and financially, never, knowingly help the GOVERNMENT. Yes it nots going to make any kind of dent in the machines armour. But if I can instil this doctrine into my children and try to inform as many people around me ( wether they partake or not ), at least the message of ” TRUTH ” Is being relayed.
    Unfortunately I find that the mind washing is so indoctrinated, that you are seen as conspiracy theorist. But like I have posted, if it’s just 1 by 1, day by day, year by year, it’s a victory.
    The TRUTH WILL ALWAYS COME TO THE FORE.
    AND AS LONG AS THE LEGISLATION BECOMES MORE DRACONIAN AND CORPORATIONS RAISE PRICES, ABOVE AND BEYOND INFLATION, THE POPULOUS WILL AWAKEN, SLOWLY BUT SURELY !!!!!!

  36. NonE Says:

    Did anyone make it to the services for Calvin? I was tied up and it took me too long to find a sharp instrument. I heard there was lots of chocolate and ski masks and stuff. A good send off. I’m sorry I missed it. Oh well.

    – NonE

  37. Dan Says:

    @NonE, Turns out Calvin’s demise was a total hoax. This was revealed when Calvin himself came out of hiding and hosted the Big Show today along with JT. Great stuff it was. 🙂

  38. NonE Says:

    Dan, AHA! J.T. and Calvin conspired and offed Marc, huh? Well THAT explains it! I never did trust either one of them. Some kinda second sense thing, you know? I wonder where they buried him. Or IF they buried him…

    – NonE

  39. NonE Says:

    How much you wanna bet that Calvin comes out with a new book called Government Indited in another year or two?

  40. Calvin Says:

    There you go NonE, FULLY UPDATED PODCAST. Look for yesterday’s show to surface on or about Wednesday. Sorry for dropping of the map for half a week… but I am playing catchup the best I can.

  41. indio007 Says:

    @Marc, A judge’s absolute immunity only applies to a narrow category of actions. This is the “judicial act”. Or in the alternative actions which are up to the judge’s arbitrary discretion.

    When a judge violates a known duty or obligation that are acting outside their office and lose immunity.

    An example would be issuing an arrest warrant without an affidavit from a competent witness.
    When a judge violates his oath of office (or any public official does) they are not an officer , they are a trespasser.

    You can attack their property if you produce proof they violated their oath. You can do this in the public interest or for yourself if you are the injured party.

    Here’s a couple cases regarding judicial immunity.
    Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 US 409 – Supreme Court 1976 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5758861728040203406
    “The common-law immunity of a prosecutor is based upon the same considerations that underlie the common-law 423*423 immunities of judges and grand jurors acting within the scope of their duties.”[20]

    ***notice it says “acting within the scope of their duties”

    [20]The immunity of a judge for acts within his jurisdiction has roots extending to the earliest days of the common law. See Floyd v. Barker, 12 Coke 23, 77 Eng. Rep. 1305 (1608). Chancellor Kent traced some of its history in Yates v. Lansing, 5 Johns. 282 (N. Y. 1810), and this Court accepted the rule of judicial immunity in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335 (1872). See n. 12, supra. The immunity of grand jurors, an almost equally venerable common-law tenet, see Floyd v. Barker, supra, also has been adopted in this country. See, e. g., Turpen v. Booth, 56 Cal. 65 (1880); Hunter v. Mathis, 40 Ind. 356 (1872). Courts that have extended the same immunity to the prosecutor have sometimes remarked on the fact that all three officials —judge, grand juror, and prosecutor—exercise a discretionary judgment on the basis of evidence presented to them. Smith v. Parman, supra; Watts v. Gerking, supra. It is the functional comparability of their judgments to those of the judge that has resulted in both grand jurors and prosecutors being referred to as “quasi-judicial” officers, and their immunities being termed “quasi-judicial” as well. See, e. g., Turpen v. Booth, supra, at 69; Watts v. Gerking, supra, at 661, 228 P., at 138.

    Butz v. Economou, 438 US 478 – Supreme Court 1978
    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6218676668787438676

    “Since an unconstitutional act, even if authorized by statute, was viewed as not authorized in contemplation of law, there could be no immunity defense.See United States v. Lee, 106 U. S. 196, 218-223 (1882); Virginia Coupon Cases, 114 U. S. 269, 285-292 (1885).”
    “““
    “The liability of officials who have exceeded constitutional limits was not confronted in either Barr or Spalding. Neither of those cases supports the Government’s position. Beyond that, however, neither case purported to abolish the liability of federal officers for actions manifestly beyond their line of duty; and if they are accountable when they stray beyond the plain limits of their statutory authority, it would be incongruous to hold that they may nevertheless willfully or knowingly violate constitutional rights without fear of liability.

    Hafer v. Melo, 502 US 21 – Supreme Court 1991

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1565538130560862626

    “These decisions have also emphasized that the official seeking absolute immunity bears the burden of showing that such immunity is justified for the function in question. Forrester, supra, at 224; Malley, supra, at 340; Harlow, supra, at 812; Butz, supra, at 506. The presumption is that qualified rather than absolute immunity is sufficient to protect government officials in the exercise of their 487*487 duties. We have been “quite sparing” in our recognition of absolute immunity, Forrester, supra, at 224, and have refused to extend it any “further than its justification would warrant.” Harlow, supra, at 811.”

    Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that “when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he “comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States.”

    “No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.”. Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958)

    Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)

    U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers.” Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

    Bates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that “not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. … it is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse.”

    The Supreme Court has formulated the two-prong functional test to determine whether an act is judicial. The first prong of the functional approach asks whether the function is one “normally performed by a judge.” Stump, 435 U.S. at 362. Clearly, the instigation of a criminal investigation by the filing of a complaint is not itself a paradigmatic judicial act, i.e., an act which occurs in the context of resolving disputes between two parties. Forrester, 484 U.S. at 227.

    “Where there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident to jurisdiction.” Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray 120, cited in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1872)

    There is a general rule that a ministerial officer who acts wrongfully, although in good faith, is nevertheless liable in a civil action and cannot claim the immunity of the sovereign. Cooper v. O’Conner, 99 F.2d 133

    “No judicial process, whatever form it may assume, can have any lawful authority outside of the limits of the jurisdiction of the court or judge by whom it is issued; and an attempt to enforce it betond these boundaries is nothing less than lawless violence.” Ableman v. Booth, 21 Howard 506 (1859).

    It strains the meaning of the words used to say this places a President “above the law.” United States v. Nixon, 418 U. S. 683 (1974). The dissents are wide of the mark to the extent that they imply that the Court today recognizes sweeping immunity for a President for all acts. The Court does no such thing. The immunity is limited to civil damages claims. Moreover, a President, like Members of Congress, judges, prosecutors, or congressional aides — all having absolute immunity — are not immune for acts outside official duties.

  42. NonE Says:

    OMG! OMG! OMG! Someone’s, or someTHING’s, captured Calvin’s soul and internet access! RUN, people RUN FOR YOUR LIVES… THE END IS VERY NEAR!!!!!!!!

    (you know whutz really embarrassing? That I did this right after that wonderful and scholarly post by Incubus. You’d think I’d have more personal pride and integrity than to look so stupid, wouldn’t you? There ya go.)

    – NonE

  43. NonE Says:

    OOOoooops. I mean by Indio. Sigh. (see! it’s hopeless)

3 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. NSP – Oct 26, 2013 – Co-host: JT – [LRN.fm Broadcast Version] - Unofficial Network Says:

    […] post NSP – Oct 26, 2013 – Co-host: JT – [LRN.fm Broadcast Version] appeared first on […]

  2. Page not found | Earth Freedom News Says:

    […] NSP – Oct 26, 2013 – Co-host: JT – [LRN.fm Broadcast Version] […]

  3. NSP - Nov 23, 2013 - MarcStevens.net Says:

    […] Jay from VA: refining strategury for a Monday contempt hearing by utilizing role-playing on the NSP skyper chat <~> refining questioning down to a few straightforward questions <~> there is no complaint in-hand, there is no witness on record, and there are no third party signatures <~> challenging the lack of an adversary and the appearence being under threat of violence <~> bringing media reps and other support to court proceedings <~> preparing for the worst-case consequences when asking questions of existence of evidence pro per <~> and challenging jurisdiction with a motion to dismiss. […]

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

Saturday, 4-7pm EST: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via youtube.com. You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.





Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.






Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter


Advertise Here