Categorized | NSP Radio Archive

NSP – Feb 8, 2014 – Co-host: JT and Guest: Bradley from London, England

Posted on February 9th, 2014 by Calvin

Co-host: JT and Guest: Bradley from London, England.

For those who claim we don’t discuss the unsuccessful adventures in legal land, this is one of many shows where we do. And for such critics who claim we are wrong or deceptive in what we discuss here, please call into the live show and embarrass us.

Funny though over the course of approximately 8½ years the No STATE Project radio show has been on-air, and a $5,000 prize for anyone who can prove the existence of a STATE or CITIZEN; we’ve yet to receive such a call, I wonder why… :?

However, it is always exciting to have another success story to report, this time with Bradley from London; congratulations! Goes to show that you can exercise effective damage control no matter which jurisdictional kingdom around the world you happen to occupy. There has to be something to this No STATE Project if people are able to get predictable and replicable results in many different countries… congrats to all that have laid tread in legal land and that have found their voluntaryist zen. :cool:

Show Topics:

  • First-world winter weather problems.
  • Government: Indicted temporarily back-ordered, which may affect whether Marc will be able to make it out to Ernest Hancock‘s Freedom Summit.
  • IRS Agent has “no idea” about what evidence they have to prove jurisdiction.
  • The tactic of calling litigants that challenge the evidence to prove jurisdiction last.
  • “Thomas J. Malloy” photo-radar traffic ticket evidentiary domino-effect incident in court.
  • Proving the STATE is a fiction and keeping the burden of proof on the complainant/prosecution.
  • When you retain an attorney, are you waiving subject-matter jurisdiction?
  • An attorney or public defender who refuses to challenge jurisdiction is guaranteeing an appealable error.
  • A judge practicing law from the bench is a criminal misdemeanor, good luck getting the court to accept the complaint though. ;)
  • The psychopath Betty Thomas was making objections and then sustaining them for herself.
  • Objecting to having a witness take the stand who is not qualified to make the determination whether the constitution and codes apply.
  • Texas judge [who later ran for district attorney] texting the prosecutor to help with their case during a proceeding.
  • Filing written objections, exceptions, and findings of facts to which each objection was sustained.
  • Proving the judge is colluding with the prosecutor.
  • Delilah’s upcoming court date for oral argument.
  • Utilizing every opportunity to object to the judge’s and/or prosecutor’s shenanigans and misconduct.
  • Despite the fact the marijuana is now legal in CO, people still use their local counter-economy merchants.
  • The idea that two people can be on the same team and yet also be independent of one another is foolishly naive.
  • How to respond to the line that “the complaint is the evidence of jurisdiction.”
  • Al’s assertion that we still think the system is useful and they’re operating under war powers and jurisdiction is their guns, so why the confusion over these jurisdictional fiascoes?
  • Refocusing the burden of prove jurisdiction back on the prosecution when they take you on rhetorical tangents.
  • The IRS apparently does not fancy when you characterize their assertion that they have jurisdiction over you as an argument. :lol:
  • Countering predictable non-responsive answers to your questions.
  • Bradley got a “driving without proof of insurance” citation thrown out of court and awarded restitution for ~$540 court expenses utilizing Marc’s script.
  • Being confident and assertive when conducting yourself in court.
  • Refining your litigation skills through experience.
  • The amazing reactions of the judge and prosecutor when one challenges the applicability of the constitution and codes/statutes.
  • Opting-out of the bar association and helping other people navigate the judicial system.
  • How to use the unsigned plea of guilty.
  • Helen’s judgement award for compensation of time and costs, which was filed and based on complaints of the many documented instances of abuse of process during her proceedings.
  • How to mentally prepare to be able to effectively litigate pro per.
  • Success rate of taking a railroading to the appellate courts.
  • Asking questions and requiring a response is the most important thing to remember in court.
  • Deriving authority based on religious law versus what’s objectively right/true or wrong/false.
  • Defending others who have not “breached the peace.”
  • Plea-bargaining with the devil/courts.
  • The deceptive nature of bureaucrats, attorneys, statists, and their apologists.
  • New case for a citation of committing the terrorist act of “fare evasion” for falling asleep on a train.
  • London’s Revenue Protection Officers.
  • Low level London prosecutor craps his pants when he realized he’s got a pro se that can see.
  • Judges also bail out prosecutors in England, surprised?
  • Following your objections with the word “Stop.”
  • Asking the judge why he is relieving, or helping, the prosecutor.
  • The chilling effect of asking questions of evidence to prove the constitution and codes apply.
  • Why would you need to adjourn for five months to determine whether the code applies when it is said to be so “self-evident?”
  • When the court fails to ensure the prosecutor proves jurisdiction, a major element of every case, file for an abuse of process cataloging their misconduct.
  • Calling prosecutor’s out on what they’re pretending to be doing.
  • The judge asking the prosecutor for legal advice.
  • The judge claims that an unsigned plea of guilty is not a plea.

Caller’s Topics:

  • Brandon and Melinda from CA: update on his wife’s preliminary hearing for felony possession <> prosecutor objects during cross-examination when the defendant asks if the officer was the one who “determined that the defendant violated the law” based on the predictable vague grounds of “relevance” :lol: <> public defender claims he “cannot file, in good faith, any paperwork questioning jurisdiction” <> attempting to fire a public defender <> the judge stonewalls with robotically repeating “sustained” when the defendant tries to demonstrate relevance to the prosecutor’s objections for irrelevance <> the judge bails out the prosecutor and makes an objection for the prosecution [conflict-of-interest much?] <> the cross-examination of the witness [who wasn't qualified to give testimony anyway] <> the judge sustained the prosecutor’s objections before the prosecutor was done making their objection <> the judge dismissively and condescendingly stonewalls by answering the defendant’s questions of evidence and applicability with “I cannot give legal advice” <>the judge aided the prosecutor with their ineffective line of questioning <> freshman persecutor needed coaching from a more seasoned liar <> and better preparing for court [try the NSP skype chat and forum].
  • David from ME: prosecutor’s response to a filed motion to dismiss <> motion to dismiss was denied by the judge without any stated grounds <> the prosecutor claims she “doesn’t need jurisdiction” <> effectively litigating within a tight deadline <> and calling the sheriff to confirm what he’s already said; that they “don’t need jurisdiction.”
              

11 Comments For This Post

  1. Calvin Says:

    Because Romania became part of the E.U., their laws are applicable?

  2. BONMAN Says:

    YOU ARE ON THE RIGHT TRACK TO REQUEST THE JURISDICTION ISSUES ON ALL INSTANCES, BUT WHEN YOU ALSO INCLUDE AS A JUDICIAL NOTICE THE FOLLOWING FACTS THE JUDGE AND PROSECUTORS DO NOT WANT ANYTHING TO DO WITH YOU OR THE ISSUES AT HAND.

    AS CAN EAILY BE PROVEN THE DEPT. OF LICENSE ONLY ISSUES “BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL “LICENSES”

    YOU SHOULD BE ASKING FOR CERIFICATION (EVIDENCE) THAT YOU WERE ENGAGED IN A BUSINESS OR PROFESSION AT THE TIME OF CITATION.

    STATE OF WASHINGTON REVISED CODE

    43.24.016
    Powers and duties — Generally
    43.24.020
    Powers and duties — Licensing.

    In addition to other powers and duties granted to the department, the director of licensing shall administer all laws with respect to the examination of applicants for, and the issuance of, licenses to persons to engage in any business, profession, trade, occupation, or activity except for health professions
    43.24.030
    “License” defined.

    The word “license” shall be construed to mean and include license, certificate of registration, certificate of qualification, certificate of competency, certificate of authority, and any other instrument, by whatever name designated, authorizing the practice of a profession or calling, the carrying on of a business or occupation, or the doing of any act required by law to be authorized by the state.

    19.02.020 Definitions
    (6) “License” means the whole or part of any agency or local government permit, license, certificate, approval, registration, charter, or any form or permission required by law, including agency rule, to engage in any activity.
    (9) “Person” means any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, association, cooperative, corporation, nonprofit organization, state or local government agency, and any other organization required to register with the state or a participating local government to do business in the state or the participating local government and to obtain one or more licenses from the state or any of its agencies or the participating local government.

    (10) “Regulatory” means all licensing and other governmental or statutory requirements pertaining to business or professional activities.

    (11) “Regulatory agency” means any state agency, board, commission, division, or local government that regulates one or more professions, occupations, industries, businesses, or activities.

    82.04.030
    “Person,” “company.”

    “Person” or “company”, herein used interchangeably, means any individual, receiver, administrator, executor, assignee, trustee in bankruptcy, trust, estate, firm, copartnership, joint venture, club, company, joint stock company, business trust, municipal corporation, political subdivision of the state of Washington, corporation, limited liability company, association, society, or any group of individuals acting as a unit, whether mutual, cooperative, fraternal, nonprofit, or otherwise and the United States or any instrumentality thereof

    82.04.140
    “Business.”

    “Business” includes all activities engaged in with the object of gain, benefit, or advantage to the taxpayer or to another person or class, directly or indirectly

    82.04.150
    “Engaging in business.”

    “Engaging in business” means commencing, conducting, or continuing in business and also the exercise of corporate or franchise powers as well as liquidating a business when the liquidators thereof hold themselves out to the public as conducting such business.

  3. A Says:

    Calvin, would you be able to make the mp3 files list Marc Stevens as artist and album as No State Project, Call of Shame (or whatever it happens to be)? If its not too hard to do and can work automatically by the editing program. I can do it myself, but if you can get it to do it automatically, that would rock.

    Thanks :)

  4. A Says:

    Woops I just put it in iTunes and see that you already had it that way. Thanks in retrospect! hahah

  5. AL Says:

    From Al

    I just sent this email to the City Manager of the City that I reside in.

    City Manager XXXX:

    Regarding a parking ticket.

    Please provide, to me, the empirical evidence that the California State Constitution Laws, Chino Hills Laws, ordinances and statutes apply to me and any other person.

    A valid response avoids circular logic and logical fallacy such as “the laws apply because we say so”, or “the ordinances and statutes apply because the ordinance or statutes say they apply”.

    If you feel you are unqualified to provide the evidence I am requesting you are encouraged to refer my request to the appropriate department such as the San Bernardino Sheriff, City Attorney/your legal staff.

    Please note that I am asking for the Evidence and not a Legal Opinion.

    Regards,

    Al LeCou

  6. mitchell moffett Says:

    so im trying to figure out what motion’s to put in to the court on this dui.by the time the trial comes up we are way past 180 days.real close to 210 within a day or to.the prosecutor told the judge that some of the berned time was on my side so thay still wave plenty of time.i read the statute,it doesn’t say any thing about who is burning who’s time.it stats from the time of the first arinment.

  7. mitchell moffett Says:

    the arrest was on 7/14/13 the arainment was on8/19/13.the trial is on 3/7/14.i think time is up.

  8. mitchell moffett Says:

    what is going to happen when I drop the jurisdiction bomb lol.am I going to get locked up?are people going to freek.i think I can argue it,but it is kind of intens lol.

  9. mitchell moffett Says:

    when I had a lawer he flet sed he would not chaleng jurediction at all end of story.

  10. Grant Says:

    Q: When a “Judge” asks you innocently : “Do you UNDERSTAND the charges?” are you agreeing to be tricked into his jurisdiction?

    The weasel word “understand” has several meanings and can apparently mean, do you stand under these charges and the authority of this particular court/psychopath? A trick question.

    Is the correct answer: “Your honor, we can not continue until the prosecutor can prove jurisdiction and applicability of the code.”

  11. Incubus Says:

    I don’t think the correct answer starts with “Your honor”. There’s nothing honorable about that man or woman.

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

Saturdays, 4-7pm EST: NSP radio LIVE. Tune-in as we discuss the general topics of tickets, tyrants, assessments, and bringing about a voluntary society.

Join us on the upcoming July 26th No STATE Project radio show as we'll be broadcasting from the 'fortified compound,' so if you're being attacked by predators with badges and titles and need help, call in at (218) 632-9399 and we can also skype you in during a break, skype me at frankrizzo3.

Saturday, August 2nd, Marc will not be live, but we will have all new content that will be broadcast. If you are in the Northern Arizona area, join Marc, Larken Rose, 4409, Ernest Hancock, and others at the Jackalope Freedom Festival.



Click here to find out how to call-in with your questions and comments, join the Skype group-chat, tune-in to terrestrial and digital broadcasts, use the phone-in listen line, subscribe to the iTunes archive feed, and much more.

------------------------PAYMENT NOTICE------------------------

I'm working on getting a paypal alternative, for now, you can use Dwolla for payments, use marcstevens(at)mail(dot)com

WeAcceptBitcoin

Bitcoin: 1NayJiRhb7gtVcSS4yNn6hxo6TJFPrQgb6









Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter


Advertise Here