NSP – Mar 8, 2014

Posted on March 9th, 2014 by Calvin

Show Notes:

  • NIN and Iron Maiden non-conformist song lyrics.
  • Marc’s upcoming interview with the Scottsdale police chief this Thursday.
  • Calling out the flipid attitude from what are supposed to be mature, professional adults.
  • Airing on the side of caution and being cooperative when handling roadside bureaucratic legal attacks conducted by men in costumes who believe they can, and should, use whatever force they deem necessary to gain compliance from their victim.
  • Katherine Callaway of Scottsdale’s risk management department warns Marc, an investigative journalist, to “guard your statements” when demonstrating the collusion and conspiracy between the judge and prosecutor.
  • Most effectively preparing yourself to ask a judge where they are getting evidence of jurisdiction from by doing your leg-work ahead of time.
  • Keeping calm in the face of the malicious rhetoric and actions from psychopathic bureaucrats.
  • The admissions attorneys perceive they get from you when you use designating terms such as taxpayer or citizen; they will try to use such accepted terminology against you.
  • Peaceful activists being targeted by the government and labeled the “most dangerous of cyber-sinners.”

Caller’s Topics:

  • Steven from CA: if you accept a plea-bargain, then are you actually accepting jurisdiction and that the laws DO apply? <> everybody in court was being offered a plea-bargain deal <> judges says that bringing in phone records proving a phone was not in use “wasn’t enough to prove [the defendant's] innocence” of violating an “operating-a-vehicle-while-on-the-phone” citation <> complaint letter filed against a judge for their misconduct will be promptly white-washed and “thank you for bringing it to our attention” generic response <> the judge flips the burden of proof from the prosecutor and cop to the defendant <> the cop begins to fabricate a story to present to the court [hiding behind the badge] to obfuscate his wrongful actions <> & the judge reduced the fines of other non-questioners by half.
  • Al from CA: reply back from the city of Chino Hills on whether there is any empirical evidence to prove the laws apply [possible SoLWT report?] <> the judge says a street sweeping citation is neither civil or criminal, but rather an administrative hearing <> & role-playing to prepare for a court date this week.
  • Fred from CA: challenging a parking ticket for parking at a faded, barley red, curb <> in the appeals process you are guilty until proven innocent <> if the witness is not present for the court proceeding, should you motion to dismiss? <> using physical evidence that disproves the prosecutor’s assertions as a back-up in case the court steamrolls over jurisdictional challenges <> raising the issue of a fair and impartial hearing when its discovered there’s a conflict of interest <> when to file a motion to dismiss for the prosecution failing to produce evidence by a certain deadline <> requiring the prosecution fully and factually prove standing and a valid cause for action <> & taking the prosecutor to small claims court for hardships and losses.
  • Jamie from MN: challenging a “temporary handicap parking zone” citation <> court officer laughs the questioning defendant out of court <> prepping for court by doing diligent research and role-playing to be comfortable and capable making objections to their non-responsive and/or fallacious answers <> residual statist conditioned and triggered guilt <> what are the essential elements of a valid cause for action, corpus delecti, and standing to complain? <> using a media-rep and/or assistence, a.k.a. McKenzie friend in court <> & the assertion that appearing as a defendant is accepting the court’s jurisdiction.
  • Art from NY: challenging roadside bureaucratic attacks from the likes of the “NY limousine and taxi unit” <> faux courts revenue-milling submitizens through the legal-land meat grinder <> & why chauffeurs do not need to comply with the permit and regulatory demands of the STATE.
  • Ayrlahn from MN: judge dismisses case where the defendant was arrested and mistreated for refusing to submit to fingerprinting on the grounds of “no probable cause” <> confronting county attorney about the multiple points of failure of procedure with enforcement of their laws <> & bureaucrats work for citizens and they must comply with their mandate to produce requested evidence and documents.
              

10 Comments For This Post

  1. NonE Says:

    Is this the final edit, or the LRN version?

  2. RadicalDude Says:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=palTkrWustY

    These parking tickets in California are just filed with a private corporation, the one in la is a subsidiary of xerox corp. The tickets are not filed with any California court system. The private corporate kangaroo courts will not tell you specifically who is responsible for the administrative review, they just say it was someone from that department who they wont let you talk to.

  3. RadicalDude Says:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xaz_XSHPVQ

    For some reason, this company that processes the tickets can just send a letter to the DMV and suspend your registration without any evidence ever being presented.

  4. RadicalDude Says:

    The “parking violations bureau” is a privately held for profit corporation “ACS” which they try to hide. They mail out letters with the letterhead caption of the city attorney to give the impression that there is some sort of legal process, but when I called the city attorney the guy I talked to said that department has nothing to do with the letter, and ACS goonsquad aka
    “parking violations bureau” admits the letter is from them(it has their phone number on it)

  5. mitch Says:

    good show bro

  6. NonE Says:

    So can anyone tell me if this is the final edit or just the LRN stream?

  7. Calvin Says:

    Yes, this is the full podcast version of the show. I would have had an LRN.fm version posted, but my recording got corrupted and I only had the full podcast to work with.

  8. NonE Says:

    DAMN corruption! It’s EVERYWHERE, I tell you – EVERYWHERE! It’s the devil. I’m sure of it. I was born pure. Pure I tell you. But I can see this corruption all around me. It’s a sin. It’s pure evil. OUT! OUT! OUT!!! (oh. oops. i didn’t think the mic was on. nevermind.)

    Thanks Calvin. ;)

    - NonEruption

  9. Professor D. Glasho Says:

    Marc – Resently I was issued a traffic citation for speeding and I signed it “Without prejudice”. a few weeks later I went to court. I put the officer on the witness stand and asked him if he had proof that he issued me a citatioon. The officer said “yes” and said he had the original copy of the citation with my signature on it. The judge asked for the original citation, to be used as evidence.

    I objected to the document being used as evidence, because the term “Without prejudice” was written on the document, and that the Supreme court cases of Ferry v. Taylor 33 Mo. 323, Durgin v. Somers, 117 Mass 55, Molyneaux v. Collier 13 Ga. 406 have all determined that documents Signed “Without Prejudice” are Not Admissible as Evidence. Here is the ruling:

    “It may, however, be considered settled that letters or admissions containing the expression in substance that they are to be ‘without prejudice’ will not be admitted in evidence…an arrangement stating the letter was without prejudice was held to be inadmissible as evidence … not only will the letter bearing the words, “without prejudice” but also the answer thereto, which was not so guarded, was inadmissible …”.

    The judge wouldn’t allow the citation to be used as evidence. The officer didn’t have any other substantial evidence; (other than his word) that he issued me a ticket.

    I moved for dismissal for lack of evidence. The judge dismissed my charge.

  10. NonE Says:

    Calvin and Marc, At about 1 hour, 20 minutes, Marc explains to Jamie from Minnesota the meaning and elements in a cause of action. This is the best explanation I’ve ever heard from Marc and I suggest you consider making this portion of the show a separate small audio file which might be filed on the website as reference material and which we can link to from the Wiki. I don’t know if there is an appropriate section of the website for this kind of material. If none exists it might be worth creating a place for audio and video reference materials. – NonE

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events


Saturday, August 23rd 4-7pm EST: Marc will be broadcasting LIVE from the 'fortified compound.' If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then call into the show at (218)632-9399 or we can skype you in during a break. You'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP group chat where you can engage in some role play to refine your litigation and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up.



Click here to find out how to call-in with your questions and comments, join the Skype group-chat, tune-in to terrestrial and digital broadcasts, use the phone-in listen line, subscribe to the iTunes archive feed, and much more.

------------------------PAYMENT NOTICE------------------------

I'm working on getting a paypal alternative, for now, you can use Dwolla for payments, use marcstevens(at)mail(dot)com

WeAcceptBitcoin

Bitcoin: 1NayJiRhb7gtVcSS4yNn6hxo6TJFPrQgb6









Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter


Advertise Here