NSP – Mar 8, 2014

Posted on March 9th, 2014 by Calvin

Show Notes:

  • NIN and Iron Maiden non-conformist song lyrics.
  • Marc’s upcoming interview with the Scottsdale police chief this Thursday.
  • Calling out the flipid attitude from what are supposed to be mature, professional adults.
  • Airing on the side of caution and being cooperative when handling roadside bureaucratic legal attacks conducted by men in costumes who believe they can, and should, use whatever force they deem necessary to gain compliance from their victim.
  • Katherine Callaway of Scottsdale’s risk management department warns Marc, an investigative journalist, to “guard your statements” when demonstrating the collusion and conspiracy between the judge and prosecutor.
  • Most effectively preparing yourself to ask a judge where they are getting evidence of jurisdiction from by doing your leg-work ahead of time.
  • Keeping calm in the face of the malicious rhetoric and actions from psychopathic bureaucrats.
  • The admissions attorneys perceive they get from you when you use designating terms such as taxpayer or citizen; they will try to use such accepted terminology against you.
  • Peaceful activists being targeted by the government and labeled the “most dangerous of cyber-sinners.”

Caller’s Topics:

  • Steven from CA: if you accept a plea-bargain, then are you actually accepting jurisdiction and that the laws DO apply? <> everybody in court was being offered a plea-bargain deal <> judges says that bringing in phone records proving a phone was not in use “wasn’t enough to prove [the defendant’s] innocence” of violating an “operating-a-vehicle-while-on-the-phone” citation <> complaint letter filed against a judge for their misconduct will be promptly white-washed and “thank you for bringing it to our attention” generic response <> the judge flips the burden of proof from the prosecutor and cop to the defendant <> the cop begins to fabricate a story to present to the court [hiding behind the badge] to obfuscate his wrongful actions <> & the judge reduced the fines of other non-questioners by half.
  • Al from CA: reply back from the city of Chino Hills on whether there is any empirical evidence to prove the laws apply [possible SoLWT report?] <> the judge says a street sweeping citation is neither civil or criminal, but rather an administrative hearing <> & role-playing to prepare for a court date this week.
  • Fred from CA: challenging a parking ticket for parking at a faded, barley red, curb <> in the appeals process you are guilty until proven innocent <> if the witness is not present for the court proceeding, should you motion to dismiss? <> using physical evidence that disproves the prosecutor’s assertions as a back-up in case the court steamrolls over jurisdictional challenges <> raising the issue of a fair and impartial hearing when its discovered there’s a conflict of interest <> when to file a motion to dismiss for the prosecution failing to produce evidence by a certain deadline <> requiring the prosecution fully and factually prove standing and a valid cause for action <> & taking the prosecutor to small claims court for hardships and losses.
  • Jamie from MN: challenging a “temporary handicap parking zone” citation <> court officer laughs the questioning defendant out of court <> prepping for court by doing diligent research and role-playing to be comfortable and capable making objections to their non-responsive and/or fallacious answers <> residual statist conditioned and triggered guilt <> what are the essential elements of a valid cause for action, corpus delecti, and standing to complain? <> using a media-rep and/or assistence, a.k.a. McKenzie friend in court <> & the assertion that appearing as a defendant is accepting the court’s jurisdiction.
  • Art from NY: challenging roadside bureaucratic attacks from the likes of the “NY limousine and taxi unit” <> faux courts revenue-milling submitizens through the legal-land meat grinder <> & why chauffeurs do not need to comply with the permit and regulatory demands of the STATE.
  • Ayrlahn from MN: judge dismisses case where the defendant was arrested and mistreated for refusing to submit to fingerprinting on the grounds of “no probable cause” <> confronting county attorney about the multiple points of failure of procedure with enforcement of their laws <> & bureaucrats work for citizens and they must comply with their mandate to produce requested evidence and documents.

10 Comments For This Post

  1. NonE Says:

    Is this the final edit, or the LRN version?

  2. RadicalDude Says:


    These parking tickets in California are just filed with a private corporation, the one in la is a subsidiary of xerox corp. The tickets are not filed with any California court system. The private corporate kangaroo courts will not tell you specifically who is responsible for the administrative review, they just say it was someone from that department who they wont let you talk to.

  3. RadicalDude Says:


    For some reason, this company that processes the tickets can just send a letter to the DMV and suspend your registration without any evidence ever being presented.

  4. RadicalDude Says:

    The “parking violations bureau” is a privately held for profit corporation “ACS” which they try to hide. They mail out letters with the letterhead caption of the city attorney to give the impression that there is some sort of legal process, but when I called the city attorney the guy I talked to said that department has nothing to do with the letter, and ACS goonsquad aka
    “parking violations bureau” admits the letter is from them(it has their phone number on it)

  5. mitch Says:

    good show bro

  6. NonE Says:

    So can anyone tell me if this is the final edit or just the LRN stream?

  7. Calvin Says:

    Yes, this is the full podcast version of the show. I would have had an LRN.fm version posted, but my recording got corrupted and I only had the full podcast to work with.

  8. NonE Says:

    DAMN corruption! It’s EVERYWHERE, I tell you – EVERYWHERE! It’s the devil. I’m sure of it. I was born pure. Pure I tell you. But I can see this corruption all around me. It’s a sin. It’s pure evil. OUT! OUT! OUT!!! (oh. oops. i didn’t think the mic was on. nevermind.)

    Thanks Calvin. 😉

    – NonEruption

  9. Professor D. Glasho Says:

    Marc – Resently I was issued a traffic citation for speeding and I signed it “Without prejudice”. a few weeks later I went to court. I put the officer on the witness stand and asked him if he had proof that he issued me a citatioon. The officer said “yes” and said he had the original copy of the citation with my signature on it. The judge asked for the original citation, to be used as evidence.

    I objected to the document being used as evidence, because the term “Without prejudice” was written on the document, and that the Supreme court cases of Ferry v. Taylor 33 Mo. 323, Durgin v. Somers, 117 Mass 55, Molyneaux v. Collier 13 Ga. 406 have all determined that documents Signed “Without Prejudice” are Not Admissible as Evidence. Here is the ruling:

    “It may, however, be considered settled that letters or admissions containing the expression in substance that they are to be ‘without prejudice’ will not be admitted in evidence…an arrangement stating the letter was without prejudice was held to be inadmissible as evidence … not only will the letter bearing the words, “without prejudice” but also the answer thereto, which was not so guarded, was inadmissible …”.

    The judge wouldn’t allow the citation to be used as evidence. The officer didn’t have any other substantial evidence; (other than his word) that he issued me a ticket.

    I moved for dismissal for lack of evidence. The judge dismissed my charge.

  10. NonE Says:

    Calvin and Marc, At about 1 hour, 20 minutes, Marc explains to Jamie from Minnesota the meaning and elements in a cause of action. This is the best explanation I’ve ever heard from Marc and I suggest you consider making this portion of the show a separate small audio file which might be filed on the website as reference material and which we can link to from the Wiki. I don’t know if there is an appropriate section of the website for this kind of material. If none exists it might be worth creating a place for audio and video reference materials. – NonE

1 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. NSP - Jul 19, 2014 - Co-host: JT - MarcStevens.net Says:

    […] Art from NY: the effective use of the unsigned plea of guilty to avoid them claiming you are “refusing to enter a plea” <> threatening prosecutors suggesting their victims to cower and follow their orders <> the prosecutor and judge do not like to give grounds for some of their key denials and rulings <> understanding the nature of the collusion between the judge and the prosecutor <> the judge left the building after finishing with the lawyers, leaving the rest of the defendants for the court clerks/staff to extort <> cops pushing for plea bargains and making decisions on behalf of the defendant in court <> and no responses from anyone from the court on the filed paperwork. […]

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via youtube.com. You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.

Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.

Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter

Advertise Here