Categorized | NSP Radio Archive

NSP – Mar 29, 2014 – Co-host: JT and Guest: John from MN

Posted on March 30th, 2014 by Calvin

Co-host: JT and Guest: John from MN, who joins us in the last segment of the show to share his adventures in legal-land as part of the Same ‘ol Lie World Tour.

Show Notes:

Caller’s Topics:

  • John from CA: promoting the “article V convention clauseconstitutionalist reformation project <> resisting oppressive government as intended and instructed within article V of the constitution <> disrupting the status quo by building a platform for the people to dissent <> Mark Levine’s steering/takeover of the “article V movement” [very similar to the neo-con takeover of the TEA party] <> complacency and fear are being socially engineered by the “powers-that-be” to keep people from organizing against them <> appearing “crazy” to the general public by discussing government’s lack of evidence to connect their legal extortion instruments to their victims <> if you are looking down the barrel of the bureaucratic gun, how should you act? <> and building a social consensus on how to peacefully deal with criminal government.
  • Greg from CO: the system has inherent vulnerabilities <> media-rep needed in the Denver, CO area this coming Monday at 11am [post here on the forum Greg] <> challenging the prosecutor’s evidence that they’re required to produce to meet their burden-of-proof <> the judge says the prosecutor “better” provide evidence of jurisdiction <> and Marc’s assertive objections made during Ian Freeman’s DMV administrative hearing.
  • Dallas from TX: domestic terrorism by questioning the evidence that bureaucrats claim they have to prove that the constitution and code apply to us non-bureaucrats <> questioning the county tax assessor on factually HOW do their assessment codes apply to anyone’s private property <> the “pay-or-get-shot” attitude of an off-the-record prosecuting attorney after redirecting a courtroom full of defendants down to a lower level room away from the judge <> “using their government code to request official documents that show how their process applies” to the targeted property <> the courts are proceeding under a commercial code to unlawfully take what they want from their unwitting victims <> effectively responding to a CP-59 form letter sent from the IRS to so-called “non-filer’s” <> and shedding the fear of persecution to pursue the truth behind years of organized racketeering and extortion.


10 Comments For This Post

  1. Andy Says:

    @John from CA, what does essentially everybody agree on? Way more than 75% (super majority) of people agree that no person should initiate force and threat of force against my individual self and my property. Essentially 100% of people can say that is true for themselves.

    If I am ever to AUTHORIZE anyone to represent me they will first and foremost convey unequivocally that no person, group or government shall initiate force and threat of force against Andy and his property.

    No constitution is necessary.

  2. NonE Says:

    Draft version, or Final Edit? – NonSurviving

  3. Calvin Says:

    This is the natural resting STATE for the full archive-quality podcast, after I have applied all the audio/rhetorical processing [i.e.: show notes and caller’s topics with links, volume leveling, dead-air trimming, visual support, and more…]. If the audio is still at some level of production process, it will be NotEd what STATE/stage the current posted audio is in. The “ version” is the LIVE stream capture directly from the LRN network. The “Draft Version” is what will become the full podcast pending some amount of editorial processing. So, if there is not tag for what version the podcast is; its the final archive-quality version. Whew, glad I can finally clear that up, I know the question was asked some time ago and I am just now responding… I’ll blame it on my left shoulder inner-bureaucrat. 😉


    …now off to work for me. Happy listening! 🙂

  4. Wyndle Says:

    For the caller John that was given so much time to discuss the Article 5 convention: If the “new” CONstitution is based on the power of individuals, would one be allowed to opt out without reprisal? If not then it is 100% the same problem that already exists and will not solve anything.

  5. NonE Says:

    So… that means this is the final edit? – NonClarityOfObtusity (and, no, it wasn’t a long standing comment. Besides… well, never mind. 😉 )

  6. Stal Jan Says:

    Thanks Calvin, I’m more then thankfull to your efforts, and my dog appreciates it to..for listening to it on my player as I walk my dog..she loves the long walks, thanks to your efforts…without this on my player, the walks would last no more the 10 my dog also thanks you, with slobbering licks all of your face, of gratitude.

  7. Snickersbar Says:

    Marc needs to dumb it down even further. These people do not understand the questions that are being asked.

    I was speaking to a cop who had the same issue “I just don’t understand your question”

    so I ask/say:

    “If I told you that a snickers bar 250 Calories and you asked for proof I could show you the wrapper with the nutritional breakdown. Failing that I could show you the calorie number on their website and could back that up with a phone call to the Mars corporation and ask them to verify the evidence even further.

    So where is the “wrapper” that backs up your WORD that the laws DO apply to me or any other person because I’m physically standing here”

    It may sound stupid but the cop certainly understood what I was asking and he gave me a “Hmmm, Im sure its written down somewhere if I look for it”

  8. Marc Stevens Says:

    @ snickersbar, I don’t think I can dumb it down any more.

  9. Jill67 Says:

    Hi Marc, I got arrested in Florida, but may go to trial in Maine. Should I submit motions in both places? I have the templates for Maine but I don’t know about Florida. My story is on the forum but no replies yet. Will definitely need and look forward to some help and will compensate. Thanks!

  10. Marc Stevens Says:

    @ jill, I’d file into the court the complaint was filed in.

3 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. NSP - Oct 25, 2014 - Co-hosts: Calvin and JT - [UPDATE: FULL PODCAST] - Says:

    […] Dallas from TX: selected for the IRS’s ‘withholding compliance program’ <> vigilantly abstaining from being tricked into submitting testimony against yourself <> the veins were pulsing on a judge’s head when the defendant filed for discovery and filed motions to dismiss asking for the evidence was required to have to factually support their charges <> defining and determining property rights <> objected to the judge entering a plea on the defendant’s behalf <> and persistently requiring the prosecution provide evidence before agreeing to anything. […]

  2. NSP – Mar 14, 2015 - Freedom's Floodgates Says:

    […] Dallas from TX: received a response/apology letter from the Department of Treasury following his and Marc’s call! […]

  3. NSP - Mar 14, 2015 - Says:

    […] Dallas from TX: received a response/apology letter from the Department of Treasury following his and Marc’s call! […]

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.

Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.

Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter

Advertise Here