Categorized | NSP Radio Archive

NSP – Jul 5, 2014 – [DRAFT VERSION]

Posted on July 6th, 2014 by Calvin

Show Notes:

Caller’s Topics:

  • Jugga from CA: disruptive judge stonewalls the defendant who’s using an unsigned plea of guilt to be able to ask questions of evidence <> the courtroom attack dogs lash out at the defendant for not maintaining eye contact with them <> [RISK ALERT] questioning the police officer on the legal basis of the stop while on the side of the road [END RISK ALERT] <> suspension of driver’s license for simply requesting a continuance <> the judge forces the defendant’s plea despite the defendant utilizing an unsigned plea of guilty to gain a minimal understanding of the nature and cause of the charges and proceedings <> court clerk laughs about the fact that there is no recording of the hearing where the judge forced a plea <> how to file the motion to dismiss/demur <> keeping the peace by educating the cops and keeping them from further victimizing others <> and the cop refuses to allow “under duress under USC 207.308” on the signature line for a ticket.
  • David from TX: used the material discussed on the show to get a “time served” bargain from the prosecution for a class B misdemeanor <> don’t poke a stick in the hornet’s nest <> the all-to-common bystander effect <> people’s manipulated blind-spot towards evidence when it comes to the sacred cow of government and breaking through the reification process <> cutting your losses and moving past a bureaucratic attack <> and the judge congratulated the defendant on a job well done and asks “what law school did you go to?”
  • Peter from MT: update on his dated¬†bureaucratic-attack of “fishing without a license.”

21 Comments For This Post

  1. Ben Says:

    This is for you Jugga. Next time you get pulled over DON’T open your window at all! There is NO law in CA or court case saying that you have to roll your window down all the way, half way, two inches, a half inch, what ever. You are only required to “exhibit” or “produce” your papers not hand them over. “CA vehicle code 4462(a), 12951(b).” So DON’T open your window! If you want to know more check this site out it has a really good flyer, for your state, you can use to put up against the window, along with your “papers”, that clearly states your rights and the codes. Check it out! ūüėČ

  2. Bradley Says:

    Re fishing guy; government can’t turn a right into a privilliage and or then charge a fee, loads of case law on this from the US supreme Court. Equally, everyone has a right to forege the land and seas for food (obviously not another persons food/property). Problem is for this guy is that he quite far down the line and put various defences/paperwork in already to the court, where this could have been fairly simple. One thing that was not established is if he was fishing on priviate property, I am assume he was not considering it’s in criminal court. Finally, I find it shocking someone can be arrested for fishing without a permit and people say we don’t live in a police state?

  3. RAD Says:

    In a world of universal deceit telling the truth becomes revolutionary.-1984

  4. Al: Beyer Says:

    …and the cop refuses to allow “under duress under USC 207.308” on the signature line for a ticket.

    I had the understanding that UCC 207-1 was replaced with 308-1 as opposed to what is written above. Am I wrong?

  5. Incubus Says:

    I heard that simply chanting USC 2268.86824-63 (aka USC CAN’T TOUCH ME) three times in a row literally creates a magic force field around you that no bureaucrat can penetrate.

  6. BO Says:

    Call of shame sounded much the same as my friend the “law” professor.
    The law is legitimized by precedent.

    In other words, we’ve been getting away with this for years, so, of course the laws apply!

    And…we’ve done this so well for so long, that 9.9 out of ten people would agree with us.

  7. Incubus Says:

    Wait, can a person be only .1 of a person? Or .9 of a person? Or 1.9 of a person?

    Is that like when black slaves were considered 3/5 of a person? (Not that I wouldn’t doubt such an outlook, still to this day)

  8. BO Says:

    @Incubus, statistically speaking… yes

  9. Incubus Says:

    Statistically speaking wouldn’t it make more sense to say 99%? 9.9 out of ten people just sounds odd, as I pointed out.

    If a .9’er and a .1’er have a baby is that child a whole person?

    Of course, what are the chances a .9 is really going to settle with a .1? I mean come on, she’d have to be REALLY drunk!

  10. Sanjay Says:

    Marc, heaven-o beloved….I’ve also listened to Kate of Gaia and the idea of using the legal name as the way the court get jurisdiction over you by you claiming to be the legal name. May I have your opinion on this.

  11. Marc Stevens Says:

    @ sanjay, the basis for their jurisdiction is a willingness to kill you. The PR is: if you are physically in Canada (or wherever) then the laws of that “state” apply. That is how they operate, ask and they’ll tell you. They don’t care what you’re name is, if you are physically in Canada, they believe their laws apply and excuse their crimes.

  12. Al: Beyer Says:

    Incubus Says:
    July 8th, 2014 at 10:25 pm

    Incubus, Can you not offer anything with a positive attitude?

  13. Incubus Says:

    “Incubus, Can you not offer anything with a positive attitude? ”

    Well now that’s a strange request. What’s wrong with being positive?

  14. Al: Beyer Says:

    Incubus Says:
    July 17th, 2014 at 11:45 am

    Since you cannot comprehend adult language, I will try again. Why are you so negative with people who don’t agree with you? Your always negative to one’s view, or belief.

  15. NonExclusive Says:

    Incubus is a Demon, and is in his nature. but he is absolutely correct. You should learn a little bit from him. His views of the law are always very clear. – NonE-Demon –

  16. Incubus Says:

    “Since you cannot comprehend adult language, I will try again.”

    Boy, what a postive thing to say! Thanks for leading by example. :/

    Since you cannot comprehend humor or construct a sentence like an adult, I’ll make it painfully obvious for you I was joking around and poking fun at the ambiguity of your question.

    As for positivity, I gave you the secret to dealing with bureaucrats. Have you tried it yet?

    “Jon, can you not offer anything with peanuts in it?” Sounds like one is requesting of Jon he not offer them anything with peanuts in it, doesn’t it? (Perhaps a nut allergy) And yet, I’M the one with comprehension problems. Geeze Louise.

  17. NonExclusive Says:

    See Al, Incubus did not go after me for calling him DEMON, he is not that stupid to believe I was serious about that, he understood the context and black humor. However I do know that he knows what’s going on in here and that he knows the concepts of the NO STATE PROJECT and the law. I do remember when he ask everybody one simple question “Who is god? give me proof who is him or it” and a lot of people like went nuts, about that simple and objective question.

  18. Incubus Says:

    Personally, I chose the name Incubus because I’m a fan of the band. Not so much the mythological creature.

    Ironically, Al here has been accused of being a demon himself. He even had multiple exorcisms performed on him through the comments section. Where is ole Reggie these days?

  19. Al: Beyer Says:

    Incubus Says:
    July 18th, 2014 at 9:51 am

    Are you and NonExclusive a couple. You understand each other so well.

  20. NonExclusive Says:

    Al, You and Martin Padilla are a couple, I believe he is the man and you… you know who you are.. the real demon in disguise.

  21. Incubus Says:

    A shining example of positivity, Al; smart, thought provoking, polite, charming. Thanks again. :\

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and he can add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.

Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.

Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter

Advertise Here