Categorized | NSP Radio Archive

NSP – Aug 9, 2014 – Co-host: Calvin

Posted on August 10th, 2014 by Calvin

Co-host: Calvin.

Show Notes:

  • Debunking the assertion that “society has accepted ‘these rules’.”
  • Requiring police to use video recording equipment during their operations and openly providing the footage for public review.
  • The possible pro-war, anti-corruption position of “anti-war protesters.”
  • “The worst atrocities in the world were not committed because of disobedience, they are the result of obedience.”
  • Recognizing, objecting to, and countering imminent threats to one’s autonomy.
  • Bradley’s lengthy record of success.
  • The court staff maintaining a docile and obedient courtroom by minimizing the amount of open objection and dissent in front of the herd-to-be-fleeced audience.
  • The point of citing rulings within the motion to dismiss is to expose how the prosecutor and judge are not following their own rules and principals.
  • An agent admits their argument is circular, “but its still applicable.”
  • The great results produced by people helping each other out in the NSP Skype chat.
  • William Grigg‘s discovery of a court ruling where a judge actually breaks rank and goes after the prosecutor’s lack of professionalism and blatant misconduct.
  • Filing a motion to change the judge when there is provable collusion and misconduct.
  • Stories of unhinged emotional outbursts from judges/robed crusaders.

Caller’s Topics:

  • Des from England: examining possible enforceable obligations created by deemed/implied contracts <> using effective questions of evidence to challenge actual ownership of an alleged ‘loan‘ and any real obligation to fulfill payment <> police classify a car stolen after a loan default, which lands daughter into the jaws of the asset-predatory police <> the complete abandonment of the principals of ‘fairness,’ ‘impartiality,’ and ‘presumption of innocence’ as unchecked assertions and assumptions fly so freely in the courtroom <> civil asset forfeiture gone wild! <> and when questioning the creditor to validate the debt, they [the creditor] could not provide any of the evidence requested.
  • Tom from MI: successful damage-control despite poo-pooing the “Marcratic” method of questioning <>the value and usefulness of connecting and role-playing with the folk in the NSP Skype chat <> disturbing-the-peace “complaint” finally dismissed, without prejudice, from court <> the prosecutor says he’s refiling the complaint as a civil violation after they figured out they could not move forward with a criminal complaint <> and how do you reconcile challenging the applicability of the law while citing their law/rulings/legal-opinion within the motion to dismiss?
  • Troy from IL: successfully exercising damage-control with “driving on a suspended license” and “alluding capture” complaints <> cops says he doesn’t need probable cause to stop and question a peacefully traveling individual <> attempted intimidation by use of extreme threats of legal punishment <> the change-of-tone from the court staff after filing Marc’s motion to dismiss <> persistently objecting to logical fallacies and assumptions suffering from factual deficiencies <> the judge becomes stuck when the defendant asks whether the judge has entered a plea on the defendant’s behalf <> building confidence in litigation by engaging in role-playing and talking with those who have been through court, asking the questions of evidence, multiple times <> and having good leverage while plea-bargaining by building a strong case using effective questioning to demonstrate the prosecution’s damning lack of evidence that he should have anyway to be allowed to even bring the complaint before the court.
  • Bronson from HI: the judge explains, by citing legal-opinion, how he can enter a plea on the defendant’s behalf <> the judge assigns an adviser to the defendant who attempts to enter a plea on the defendant’s behalf <> recycling convicts through the system and maintaining a revenue-stream by abusive “violation of probation” charges <> over-expansive use of probable cause that police use to search premises <> persistently requesting discovery from an overly-reluctant court and prosecutor <> really feeling the prejudice of the judge <> where is the presumption of innocence after the defendant has been jailed, stabbed, headbutted, choked all before any sort of discovery? <> the out of control, and far from oversight, prison system <> and the appreciation of using the pen, which is mightier than the sword, to challenge bureaucratic psychopaths.

              

5 Comments For This Post

  1. citta Says:

    1hr 11 mins [on the LRN.fm broadcast version]…. if the daughter was driving a stolen car then she should have been arrested. This case stinks. Too many things don’t add up on the police side

  2. Bradley Knight Says:

    Get Des to contact me, I can get him in court, suggest chancery in London, in this instance to get the property back.

  3. Matthew Says:

    @0:24:00 Ah! The bicycle incident! So Marc Stevens really is a peddler of domestic terrorism… 😉

  4. NonE Says:

    EVIDENCE that Marc Stevens is certifiable! 😉 At last we have the proof.

  5. NonE Says:

    Marcratic.net vs. Government.con
    Now taking wagers. Bitcoin gladly accepted.

7 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. NSP - Aug 16, 2014 - MarcStevens.net Says:

    […] Des from England: good news: criminal charges withdrawn! <> utilizing ‘bargaining tools,’ with the assistance of Bradley, when challenging the validity and obligations of shadowy loans <> trouble with getting the judge’s decisions in writing <> property seizure legal battles <> and gaining support and building confidence from peers. […]

  2. Marc on Disclosure Media with Rex Bear - Sept 3, 2014 - MarcStevens.net Says:

    […] guiding principals underpinning the ‘Marcratic‘ […]

  3. NSP - Sept 6, 2014 - Co-host: Calvin - [UPDATE: FULL PODCAST] - MarcStevens.net Says:

    […] from MI: splitting up motions that have multiple issues/challenges into as many motions as possible […]

  4. NSP - Sept 13, 2014 - Co-host: Calvin - MarcStevens.net Says:

    […] ‘Marcratic‘ method = scientific method + Socratic […]

  5. NSP – Mar 14, 2015 - Freedom's Floodgates Says:

    […] Troy from IL: staying out of jail by effectively exercising damage-control by calmly making assertive objections to the prosecution’s non-responsive answers the value of role-playing courtroom procedure is pivotal to “winning” your case thoroughly understanding logical fallacies so you can properly object when you start getting them from the prosecutors without leaving them much wiggle-room confronting the judge and asking him “why are you trying the case for the prosecutor?” and was the time required to effectively defend yourself well-spent? […]

  6. NSP - Mar 7, 2015 - MarcStevens.net Says:

    […] to help people learn to defend themselves against bureaucratic legal attacks utilizing the “Marcratic methodology” <> noting due process violations, such as when the judge proceeds with a […]

  7. NSP - Mar 14, 2015 - MarcStevens.net Says:

    […] Troy from IL: staying out of jail by effectively exercising damage-control by calmly making assertive objections to the prosecution’s non-responsive answers <> the value of role-playing courtroom procedure is pivotal to “winning” your case <> thoroughly understanding logical fallacies so you can properly object when you start getting them from the prosecutors without leaving them much wiggle-room <> confronting the judge and asking him “why are you trying the case for the prosecutor?” <> and was the time required to effectively defend yourself well-spent? […]

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

Saturday, 4-7pm EST: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream broadcast via Ustream.tv. You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.





Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.






Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter


Advertise Here