Categorized | NSP Radio Archive

NSP – Nov 29, 2014 – Co-host: Calvin

Posted on November 30th, 2014 by Calvin

Co-host: Calvin.

Show Notes:

              

11 Comments For This Post

  1. eye2i Says:

    Noticing upfront, Marc’s stating that it’s his perspective that it’s Al standing up for himself, relative to who’s initiating violence, that’s the focus… Isn’t it a bit ironic (as the nicer word choice?) though, that Al wants to Argue his (particular) religious position as valid, aka to be respected, but that the other guys equally religious position is, well, a religious position he won’t respect?
    And more specifically, didn’t the Offense (most call it the “Prosecution”) give him the option, per “oath -OR- affirmation”, where he asked “Will you tell the truth here?” could and should be answered –fwiw (as seeking consistency here)– in accord with Al’s CODE aka the BuyBull (pronounced “bible”) with it’s “Let your ‘yes’ be ‘yes'”? aka “Yes, i will tell the truth, as the facts as i know them.”?
    [optional thereafter of course, to turn it around and ask the Offender (most call it the “Prosecutor”) if he personally will tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, according only to the facts, “Yes or no”?.?]

    And as far even as the “initiation of violence” goes, doesn’t Al have a “New” “Commandment” (aka “God’s Will/Law”) in that regards too? aka “turn the other cheek (take the assault)”, “walk the mileage (time & labor)”, “give him your cloak (property/wealth)”? [and watch Marc himself with this one?] And isn’t “Government” “God’s Ministers’ (for Al’s “good”) aka “God’s Will”?
    [yeah, baby, let’s Argue (as) religious dogma, where we’ll all appeal to each of our C.O.D.Es as our “Morality” source.? Where both here are but opinions and hearsay –if we’re sticking with the facts, right? smh.]

    i’m on “the record” here, several times, saying how much i appreciated specific NSP shows, and was most sincere in doing so; but i have to tell you, up through hour 1 of this show, i’ve been most disappointed.
    [where as Freerangecanuck has touched on in the forum, man, being/going Stoic is work! –as is practicing consistent Socratic methodology…]

    #respect2 for hosting me here, with my arguments. ✓

  2. Marc Stevens Says:

    At what point did Al threaten any kind of force against them? I certainly heard them threaten him.

  3. i.n.rem Says:

    thanks for sharing, AL
    nice job .. 🙂

  4. i.n.rem Says:

    and, this just shows how any kind of Court interaction will result in the “fabrication” of a Record to your personal detriment

  5. desertspeaks Says:

    why is the judge and prosecutor ever sworn to tell the truth under penalty of perjury?? they are known pathological liars! would that be the reason?

  6. Marc Stevens Says:

    They are not supposed to be giving testimony.

  7. desertspeaks Says:

    isn’t or aren’t instead of is.

  8. eye2i Says:

    @Marc: “At what point did Al threaten any kind of force against them? I certainly heard them threaten him.”
    Was this prompted>posted regarding my post>point?

  9. RAD Says:

    Why is Al required to be consistent with the bible just because he has faith? Something athiest proselytizers confuse me on is how they want a “creationist” to be “on the hook”(and the atheist’s interpretation of it at that) for what the bible says when the “creationist” didn’t write it? Is Marc On the hook for everything spooner said just because he quotes him sometimes? Do atheists have to be held accountable to the theories of Darwin? “You contradicted darwin Yo what gives I guess I just showed you or darwin are a huge hypocrite or something.” Does the bible ever Explicitly and unequivocally say everything in the bible is literally the infallible word(s) of god himself as the only or main author? I’m sure you can find someone who will say that ABOUT IT. But where in the bible is that claim explicitly made? We are talking about lots of books gathered from many sources and compiled by a government- appointed council of bishops. Do you think everyone who thinks there is some good stuff in there must lend it all equal weight?

  10. RAD Says:

    Why is Al required to be consistent with the bible just because he has faith? Something athiest proselytizers confuse me on is how they want a “creationist” to be “on the hook”(and the atheist’s interpretation of it at that) for what the bible says when the “creationist” didn’t write it? Is Marc On the hook for everything spooner said just because he quotes him sometimes? Do atheists have to be held accountable to the theories of Darwin? “You contradicted darwin Yo what gives I guess I just showed you or darwin are a huge hypocrite or something.” Does the bible ever Explicitly and unequivocally say everything in the bible is literally the infallible word(s) of god himself as the only or main author? I’m sure you can find someone who will say that ABOUT IT. But where in the bible is that claim explicitly made? We are talking about lots of books gathered from many sources and compiled by a government- appointed council of bishops. Do you think everyone who thinks there is some good stuff in there must lend it all equal weight.?

  11. i.n.rem Says:

    the more important observation one might make …
    90% of the Prosecutions Evidence comes from your own mouth

3 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. NSP - Dec 6, 2014 - MarcStevens.net Says:

    […] Correcting some misreporting from last week’s show. […]

  2. NSP - Jan 3, 2015 - MarcStevens.net Says:

    […] from CA: thanks for playing the call of shame where he [Al] was declining to participate in the court’s religious practice… <> asking questions of evidence does work, but not every time when you have an overly […]

  3. NSP - May 9, 2015 - Co-host: Vin James - [UPDATE: FULL PODCAST] - MarcStevens.net Says:

    […] of their felony charges <> some of problems and admissions from Mike’s trial <> making effective conscientious objections <> the point of putting bureaucrats under oath and their otherwise utter uselessness <> […]

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via youtube.com. You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.





Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.






Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter


Advertise Here