Categorized | NSP Radio Archive

NSP – Dec 6, 2014

Posted on December 7th, 2014 by Calvin

Show Notes:

Caller’s Topics:

  • Kali from CA: political persecution under the local judge’s disfavor <> traffic citations generated by bureaucratic DMV fumbling <> multiple arraignments[?] <> filing a motion to dismiss to start the process of challenging the citation/legal-attack <> using CONstitutionalist rhetoric (“right to travel”) on the roadside <> play-by-play of prior kangaroo court proceedings up until now <> courtroom intimidation and purposeful confusion <> and living life without feeding the STATE machine.
  • Marva from GA: filed the motion to dismiss and motion for reconsideration <> the judge claims that there were no grounds stated within the motions when grounds are stated <> how to formulate objections <> responding to a granted hearing to reconsider letter <> could you challenge a property tax assessment that is in someone else’s name? <> how do you pursue a risk management complaint and claim? <> and how do you respond when the IRS claims you owe money after they consider you a ‘non-filer‘?
  • Terry from MI: update on an ongoing freedom to travel case <> the condescending and abusive treatment from the correctional system <> the prosecution asks “what would you plea guilty to?” <> the judge has the audacity to claim he “doesn’t like putting people in jail” after so whimsically placing the defendant in jail <> using the skype group chat for role-playing court procedure to fine tune litigation skills <> and the discovery of a presigned warrant for arrest found in a cooperative litigant’s case file.

              

27 Comments For This Post

  1. Incubus Says:

    Featuring music from Nine Inch Nails in the show notes is the single greatest musical contribution on here I’ve heard thus far. Now, if you can just get rid of that jazz crap and feature more NIN you’ll be on the right track.

  2. NonExclusive Says:

    I like your attitude Incubus, but don’t you think Marc will be upset with your request, his Jazz is like his signature theme, kind of like COAST TO COAST STYLE

  3. Incubus Says:

    Granted, he’ll likely be opposed to my proposition. But, clearly the man has good taste somewhere underneath that jazz veneer. He’s obviously a fan of NIN and I’ve seen/heard him support/mention Alice In Chains as well. Not to mention his Skype name is Frank Rizzo, a reference to The Jerky Boys, which, come one, deserves straight props alone. He’s got the rapport, he’s just got to drop that jazz nonsense and own it.

  4. Boxer Says:

    Everyone is actually in agreement that Pink Floyd should replace all that Jazz junk (argumentum ad populum).

  5. Incubus Says:

    Pink Floyd is certainly an acceptable supplement. Though, which era/album(s) are “we” talking about? I’ll also accept early Metallica (speed metal era) or Pantera as well. Hell, mix it up. Just drop the jazz for goodness/(Zeus, Yahweh, Krishna?) sake.

  6. NonExclusive Says:

    Incubus, Months ago you told me that you got your Nick from one Musical Act didn’t you? You are one of the “regulars” and I like your opinions which are based on facts and not some “Paytriot” bull-crap. How about “Shine on you crazy Diamond” for one of the Intro’s?

  7. NonExclusive Says:

    How about Metallica’s .. and justice fir all, Master of Puppt or the Black Album?

  8. Incubus Says:

    Yes, my use of Incubus is inspired by the band of the same name (not so much the mythological demon that rapes women, for obvious reasons).

    Which part(s) of Shine On are you referring to specifically? I would also suggest the opening of Have A Cigar for the intro. That groovy riff would be a smooth transition to Marc’s hepcat jive.

  9. NonExclusive Says:

    Exactly, part 3: Have a cigar, that will be spectacullar. But it will be up to Marc now. I do agree that NIN was one of his best choices, that give the show a great touch of freshness

  10. DanAykroyd2i Says:

    Incubus you ignorant slut. [done in my best Dan “Point-Counterpoint” Aykroyd impersonation]
    Keep mixing it up, Marc. Don’t listen to this blasphemy of The One True Music! 😉

    And listen to Representanaive Boxer! Who dis “we” you speak of, NonRepresentative? doG, if i hear another Pink Floyd song, just hand me the revolver already –no seriously, The Beatles Revolver (“Taxman”) –anything but another PF song!! [thank you commercial radio, for ruining such otherwise awesome work for me]

    [and Metallica? Those Statheists? really!?! thank you, Governmentalist Metallica members for ruining all your songs for me as well; Enter Sandman = Enter Policeman, if you stream/capture such]

    Guess i’m going to have to que Henry Rollins Band’s “Disconnect (My Self)” ’bout here…

    Keep up the good work, Marc –including music mixing. Pay no attention to the ignoRant sluts. 😉 Long live Tribal Tech Henderson etal!!

  11. DanEarroid2i Says:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3w5eZRoOY4 😉

  12. Marc Stevens Says:

    @ dan Love Rollins Band, good choice.

  13. Incubus Says:

    Slow your roll, tuff guy. You can call me a slut, ’cause let’s face it, Dad gets around, but how dare you call me ignorant! Quoting Dan “The Statist” Akroyd gets you no points in this arena, sir.

    “Keep mixing it up, Marc.” The problem is he isn’t mixing or fixing to mix, he’s fixated on that Devil music “jazz”, Satan’s Lullaby. Saxophones are mostly annoying and largely unnecessary. Kenny G plays the sax. Would you let that weirdo around your kids?!

    Despite Metallica’s past douchebaggery, their early work remains unsullied. Rollin’s is a Statheist himself. No points earned, no points given.

    Check mate.

  14. NonExclusive Says:

    Dan, you need to learn to respect other people’s opinion, just because your Dad treat you like s… say that does not mean you can do the same to others. Say wherever you want but do that not insult, that does not make you look tought and smart that make look STUPID.

  15. Boxer Says:

    @ToughGuyDan

    Where exactly did I write “we”? Maybe you missed my sarcasm when I noted that I was making an appeal to populism?

  16. DanEarroid2i Says:

    DanEarroid2i (the artist formerly known to have cyber danced under the professional stage name eye2i, now formally ToughGuyDan2) here.

    @Marc: ✓glad2hear you knew of the Rollins Band ditty!

    @Incubus: “Slow your roll, tuff guy. You can call me a slut, ’cause let’s face it, Dad gets around, but how dare you call me ignorant!

    How dare you dare me!? (Counterpoint Dan’s just a character on a silly tv show, you know?) And not inquire what definition of “ignorant” “Dan” intended!? (see “ignore-rant”; see also “nescient”? see also “clueless”?)

    “Quoting Dan “The Statist” Akroyd gets you no points in this arena, sir.” –what evidence do you have that i quoted “Dan ‘The Statist’ Aykroyd? (rather than i quoted the fictional SNL character “Dan ‘The Point-Counterpoint’ Aykroyd? (speaking of check mate?!) And how Stateist of you to speak for all in “this arena”!? [you didn’t though did you, *wink* wink*; no, you meant the arena of your mind, aye?]

    “The problem is he isn’t mixing or fixing to mix, he’s fixated on that Devil music “jazz”, Satan’s Lullaby. Saxophones are mostly annoying and largely unnecessary. Kenny G plays the sax. Would you let that weirdo around your kids?!” — LMAO!! (of course one could only assume that was intended as sarcasm.? rather than yet more ignore’rants!?)

    “Despite Metallica’s past douchebaggery, their early work remains unsullied. Rollin’s is a Statheist himself. No points earned, no points given.” —Oh, now isn’t this rich!? So it’s pardon Metallica as Stateists, but crap on Dan Aykroyd’s “early work” (you know, “unsullied” –thus declareth the Mighty i-I-I-Incubus!?) [oh, and you’re gonna compare Rollins Band to Metallica as manifesting Statetheism? i dunno…? not to even get into, if one stuck to only listening to music by non-Stateists –well, talk about a stagnant mix!?]

    “Check mate.” —Check ignorance? (how ’bout instead of check mate, it’s check opinions? i mean, dog, we’re talking tastes here, no? –which leads us to NonExlusive…)

    @NonExclusive: “Dan, you need to learn to respect other people’s opinion, just because your Dad treat you like s…” —LOOK! NonEx didn’t say a dirty four-letter word, naner-naner-naner! SMDH/LMAssO. Hey, NonEx, what about if it’s you that needs to learn to have a sense of humor? And look, a wanna-be psychologist psychic via pixels on a screen –or were you projecting with that “Dad” bit? (or looking in your mirror when you typed that?)

    @Boxer: “@ToughGuyDan, Where exactly did I write” … you mean like where did i write “ToughGuyDan”? And what’s up with all the “Tough” bit?! Let’s see now, where have i heard the expression “Tough Guy”… oh, yeah, Marc referring to Governmentalists! Nice. Thanks, guys![/sarcasm –and if yours was too, sorry ’bout that chief, it doesn’t read like it to me]

    “Where exactly did I write “we”?” –The forum software records you as posting: “Everyone is actually in agreement…” (only you can tell me if “Everyone” = “we” “exactly”.?)
    AS it also (obviously?) records you with “(argumentum ad populum)” –so maybe you missed my seeing your sarcasm and raising you one? [though that’s a different game from Incubus’ with his “Check mate” King’s lingo.?]

    Wow, let me take off my Point-Counterpoint Aykroyd hat here and put on my Rodney Dangerfield one: Tough crowd, tough crowd. i get no respect i tell ya…
    Hey, Marc, que up that Rollins Band for me here?: ♪ I just want to disconnect my self… right now! ♫

  17. NonExclusive Says:

    Dan, I do have to admit that, I was too hard on You and that your wording (opinion) was in light to create humor and sarcasm and with that I just want it to say ” Welcome aboard” it happens with me in the past when I had try to humorize one comment, but I guess is a human nature to “sometimes” create conflict when it isn’t. ( I admire the fact that you didn’t seem pist for being so hard on you and with that I am got nothing to say, one more thing.. Analizing my self, I think I went after you for you being after Incubus. Incubus is someone I interact in the past and He is one of the many regulars that understand the NO STATE PROJECT perfectly

  18. Lyndon Says:

    Marc:

    You are still making the same error of entering jurisdiction and then trying to find a way out. When you write:

    “California courts cannot simply assume jurisdiction after a defendant requests a verified complaint”

    Of course -as an operation of law- any court “assumes” jurisdiction over a “defendant” REGARDLESS of ANY utterance or writing. In other words, in lay terms, you can’t go into someone else’s game as a player and then question why they make the rules.

    Marc, Karl and I told you before, you have to stay outside because once you’re in they make the rules. It is that simple.

    No hard feelings. Just the facts -right?

  19. eye2i Says:

    @Lyndon: Let me see if i’m following you (and your beloved Karl)? Those hallucinating and/or delusional and willing to cage and kill others in regards to such, are a “game” to you.? (“someone else’s” –or your own?)
    And what of this “of course” and “just the facts -right?” –when you speak of one being able to “go into” someone else’s “game”, aka go into an others hallucination? Imagine that! (yupp, that “go into” is all imaginary -right? And “no hard feelings”?)
    And “an operation of law”, when said “law” is just hypocritical superstitious opinion that someone else is willing to cage and kill over? Alakazam & open sezame (clicking of ruby slipper heels 3 times not an option! -right?)! That simple? Just the facts -right –indeed?
    ______________
    If you buy it when someone tells you they’re “enforcing the law”, you’re doing it wrong –see the gravity of that– literally; you want to see actual law and law enforcement, see violation of gravity for one actual demonstration.?

  20. Incubus Says:

    Eye2/Dan2, for a guy who prides himself on sarcasm you sure seem to lack a grasp on the concept of sarcasm. Do you always get your panties in a bunch so easliy or do you wake up that way?

    Of course my post was sarcastic. The Akroyd comment (though I’m sure he probably is a statist), the Kenny G comment (though he does seem like a weirdo), the Rollin’s comment (I like his music but he is a statist), and yes the check mate comment was meant to tie up the fake tirade of my already sarcasm soaked post (I mean really, who sodomized you as a child so bad you lost your sense of humor and can’t tell sarcasm from the torn hole in your ass?!).

    Take a chill pill, ace. If you walk around in defense mode you’re bound to get your ego bruised.

    All in all, however, I would really like to see Marc mix it up a bit. This jazz nonsense just doesn’t cut it. Wouldn’t hurt to add some variety. Unless it means your feelings are on the line. Zeus knows you’re fragile enough as it is, we don’t need you going all Kenny G and freaking everybody out.

  21. desertspeaks Says:

    repost not spam, here is a great video on the religion of statism.. spread it far and wide!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6uVV2Dcqt0#t=132

  22. eye2i Says:

    Oh, Incubus Magoo, you’ve done it again. Now you get to claim that one’s having been sodomized (butt yet again all in your own fantasy) is “sarcasm” as well?
    Some advice? Don’t quit your day job for a career in counseling or psychic reading or as a comedian.? [/nonsarcasm]
    Doncha just luv these guys that want to tell you what your own feelings are, and about your ego, and what you lost, and how fragile you are yada yada blah?!? All via a few pixels on their puter screen!
    [maybe it’s their own reflection in said screen that prompts such to their heads? trying to get that guy to listen to them regarding such…?]

    Oh, and Marc: pay no attention to that Incubus behind the Wizierd’s curtain –keep the jazz & funk going –it does cut it (too)!

  23. Incubus Says:

    “Some advice? Don’t quit your day job for a career in counseling or psychic reading or as a comedian.? [/nonsarcasm]”

    Likewise.

    “Now you get to claim that one’s having been sodomized (butt yet again all in your own fantasy) is ‘sarcasm’ as well?”

    Well, yes, it was intended as sarcasm (why on earth would I fantasize about you being raped?), but the way you’re reacting it seems I must have struck a nerve with you on a personal level, so allow me to retract and apologize for my statement, for I did not intend to rile up any past trauma you’ve endured.

    “Now you get to claim…”

    Well, yes, why can’t I claim what my own words mean? Or am I not allowed to? Ah yes, I get the drift now, only you, Mighty e-E-E-Eye2, can dictate the definition and intent of the words of others, right?

    “Doncha just luv these guys that want to tell you what your own feelings are, and about your ego, and what you lost, and how fragile you are yada yada blah?!?” 

    Hah, “these guys”, he says. I suppose that doesn’t include you, does it?

    “And look, a wanna-be psychologist psychic via pixels on a screen”
    “[maybe it’s their own reflection in said screen that prompts such to their heads?…”

    I suppose your screen doesn’t show a  reflection, or perhaps one can’t see it when they close their eyes and refuse to see? 

    But then again, Mr. Sarcasm, you’ll have to tell me what my words really mean.

  24. NonExclusive Says:

    Incubus, you really got brains and I mean it, the way you put this idiot in his place. Now he got something to tell his psycologist, ja, ja, I can imagine ” Doctor the trauma of my childhood is back again in my head, somebody Online cause me back all those repressed memories.”

  25. eye2i Says:

    @NonExclusive/@Incubus: i.e. “eye2i’s a traumatized, sodomized brainless idiot delusional know-it-all”.
    Considering the sources, thanks for the awesome compliments! (aka any newspeak labels that distinguish me from you two!)
    :2thumbsup:

  26. Incubus Says:

    @NonExclusive/@Incubus: i.e. “eye2i’s a traumatized, sodomized brainless idiot delusional know-it-all”.

    Your words. Not mine. (I can’t speak on behalf of NonExclusive)

    But wait, I forgot. You are the Blessed, the Chosen One, with eyes to see and ears to hear, the Mighty Eye2 (praise Him!), the Great Decoder, he who determines the meaning and intent of others words.

    Which in that case; Gadzooks! Is that REALLY what I was saying? I feel quite ashamed then. Or is it less likely that’s what I said, and more likely what you are “hearing”/seeing, via what you’re feeling (i.e., a true image of oneself?). (You know, in the arena of your mind)

    “Considering the sources…”

    Considering how little you likely know about the “sources” other than they are each an individual in front of a computer screen, what is there to consider, really? Or are you playing “a wanna-be psychologist psychic via pixels on a screen” and have us all figured out?

  27. marc stevens Says:

    Because these are the type of comments you want on your homepage. 🙁 At least take it to the forum if you are somehow compelled to post such comments.

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

Saturday, 4-7pm EST: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via youtube.com. You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.





Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.






Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter


Advertise Here