Categorized | NSP Radio Archive

NSP – May 2, 2015 – Guest: Skyler J. Collins

Posted on May 3rd, 2015 by Calvin

Guest: Skyler J. Collins from Everything Voluntary joins us to discuss evidence of jurisdiction, anarchy, economics, moral outrage towards ethical violators, and resisting propaganda laced into school curriculum.

Show Notes:

  • Skyler’s article based on Marc’s research into the lack of evidence to prove jurisdiction and what feedback, tangents, and critiques they’ve generated.
  • Talking anarchy and evidence to peers that usually end up in a philosophical discussion.
  • Getting a ticket dismissed on a legal issue.
  • A returned call from a New Hampshire bureaucrat who asserts questions of evidence are a “philosophical arguments.”
  • “Comply-or-die” is an indisputable and indispensable operational policy of statists.
  • “Don’t mistake your willingness to harm me as consent or evidence to prove your laws apply.”
  • …but who will build the roads?
  • Ron Paul’s public education on the reality of blow-back.
  • Paying for roads without the “comply-or-die” fundraising.
  • “How do I communicate with this bureaucrat and minimize the spin, diversions, and distractions they’ll predictably use?”
  • Exposing the statist double-standard by using the Marcratic questioning method.
  • Mastering asking questions in a simplified, meaningful, and direct manner.
  • Qualifiers when shopping for an attorney: do they truly believe that the prosecution shouldn’t be given a free-pass on their burden to prove any and all of their assertions and arguments?
  • Connecting facts and evidence to support an opinion or conclusion.
  • The reactions of cognitive dissonance you get from bureaucrats, and their apologists, when questioning the applicability of the law that is generally “taken for granted” and much “like Santa Claus.”
  • Explaining applicability of the law to children.
  • Penn Jillette has already raped and murdered everyone he ever wanted to.
  • Do you really need a politician to tell you right from wrong?
  • The anarchy in Baltimore proves once again that liberal policies haven’t worked.”
  • Skyler’s journey towards fr33dom and anarchy.
  • Anarchy is not anomie.
  • Copsucker government apologists and reporters.
  • Phoenix Cop Fatally Shoots Domestic-Violence Suspect — and His Dog — For No Apparent Reason.
  • Middle Eastern States Debate Whether to Intervene in Baltimore. πŸ˜€
  • The self preserving excuses imperialist governments and their apologists use.
  • Examining moral outrage and universal ethics.
  • What it actually means, and doesn’t mean, when statist laws don’t apply and you have unfettered anarchy.
  • Authoritarian rulers usually exempt themselves from their own rules.
  • Required reading for some educational courses;Β Skyler J. Collins‘ “Toward a Free Society: A Short Guide on Building a Culture of Liberty” on how to value liberty and moral outrage against miscarriages of liberty.
  • Breaking free from institutional statist Pavlovian conditioning in school curriculum and culture.
  • Would you feel moral outrage if someone burned a black flag? πŸ˜€
  • Howard Zinn and Ray Rapheal‘s historical research outside the bounds of politically sanctioned subjects.
  • The little known history of the black wall street riot of Tulsa in 1981.
  • The connection between race relations and economics; both are an issue of autonomy and civil rights.
  • Cop walks up and starts groping a girl, video uploaded to liveleak.
  • The irony of bureaucrats urging other people to be non-violent.
  • Over-reactive processing clerks/bullies.
  • Statist authoritarians that beat down free and critical thinkers.
  • The cyclical perpetuation of statist propaganda in schoolrooms.
  • Do your facts and evidence come before or after your conclusion(s)?
  • Chiding the New Hampshire bureaucrat on Bill’s case about how he doesn’t respect Bill as an autonomous individual.
  • Rare instances where a bureaucrat is willing to hear a person out.
  • The beauty of Socratic questioning.
  • Quantifying value of life and defending against those who bring imminent danger to such value.
  • The limited virtue of pacifism.
  • Instructive examples on how to counter slight variances of common bureaucratic non-responses demonstrated in the latest two Call-of-Shames from the past week.
  • If I, a Missourah-California hybrid, can understand and articulate simple questions of evidence, surely a educated bureaucrat understands the questions as well, they just aren’t as willing to overcome their own biases to respond in good faith.
  • A low-level tax agent claims her intelligence is being “downgraded” by interruptions, but fails to realize that she is the one doing most of the interrupting.
  • Catching and countering common non-responses such as the STATE-department two-step, questions being conflated as arguments, interruptions, and logical fallacies.
  • Specifying what exactly the “obvious,” “self-evident” evidence is that’s always considered “a given” by authoritarians.
  • Recognizing outcome-based proceedings/persecutions.
  • Unlike statists; anarchists and activists have supporters, not apologists.
  • Breaking free from statist social conditioning while avoiding falling into chaos.
  • “You don’t understand civil rights and social equality completely if you don’t understand free-market economics.”
  • “The coercive use-of-force delegitimizes any product or service.”
  • Lets not forget that the War on Drugs is source of the incident that sparked Baltimore riots.
  • Getting confirmation on the agent’s lack of qualification to make a factual determination on what evidence there actually is to prove that their laws apply.
              

15 Comments For This Post

  1. NonEntity Says:

    “The government types are the ones that DON’T believe in rules.” – Mr. Marcratic himself πŸ™‚

  2. Steven Richards Says:

    Could it be the evidence of so called jurisdiction that Marc Stevens seem to obsess about is provided when him or someone following him claims to be the name they use, or own something, like the name?

    Could it be force is only initiated when someone claims to be the name, or own something, like the name?

    Could it be if one fails to make any claims in an honorable manner, the so called case will be dismissed or discharged?

  3. NonEntity Says:

    At about 1:09 Skyler sez something to the effect of kids are not trained to question and we need to train them to do this. But think on this, there is a period in every child’s life when it seems that all they do is ask BUT WHY? And so this leads me to wonder how it is that children’s natural curiosity gets crushed I to what Skyler observes? Is this a natural progression of maturation, or a political design, or just how does this come about. Personally I don’t think I ever had my curiousity crushed as so many have. I consider this a blessing from my parents. I’m not sure whether that was by design or neglect, but either way I cherish it.

  4. NonEntity Says:

    Steven Richards, could it be that you’ve never had any personal contact with the real world?

  5. Steven Richards Says:

    What do you mean by the terms “personal contact” and “real world”?

    Could it be as long as you believe you’re just a victim, you wont enjoy the moment as much as possible?

  6. Steven Richards Says:

    http://amorebeautifulquestion.com/why-do-kids-ask-so-many-questions-but-more-importantly-why-do-they-stop/

  7. NonEntity Says:

    “Children are the research & development division of the human species”@GlimmerGuy

    Excellent link, Steven.

  8. Staljanski Says:

    Steven Richards Says:
    Could it be the evidence of so called jurisdiction that Marc Stevens seem to obsess about <<(is the gov co "obsessed" at claiming it over you?, with what evidence?) provided when him or someone following him claims to be the name they use, or own something, like the name? <<( name/Name/NAME , is irrelevANT to men with badges)

    Could it be force is only initiated when someone claims to be the name, or own something, like the name? <<(could it be your name is YOURS?, could it be your obsessed with not having one?, could it be it DOSNT MATTER? and yor not thinking logically?)

    Could it be if one fails to make any claims in an honorable manner, the so called case will be dismissed or discharged? <<(could it be there is no "U (you)" in honoUrable?..and therefore in dis honour?..could it be all they want is your MONEY?,and dont care about charges or misses?)

    could it be? batman? there is NO EVIDENCE of JurisDICKtion? whether you have a NAME or not?(besides the guns and cages)…could it be? its all about control of your mind?(and they've accomplished that on you already) could it be you've already been enslaved in your NAMEgame?, and are duped into playing? with or without that NAME/Name/name?..

    Jon/JON/JAn/jUaN/wan/yan. ying/yang..peace in and out.

  9. Steven Richards Says:

    “name/Name/NAME , is irrelevANT to men with badges”

    Then why bring it up?

    “could it be your name is YOURS?, could it be your obsessed with not having one?, could it be it DOSNT MATTER? and yor not thinking logically”

    What do you mean by “having”? If you believe you have firsthand knowledge that I own the name I use, or anything else, would you please enlighten me? Thanks brother.

    “could it be there is no “U (you)” in honoUrable?..and therefore in dis honour?..could it be all they want is your MONEY?,and dont care about charges or misses?”

    Maybe the spelling depends which side of the pond you’re on? What do you mean by “your MONEY”? Do you believe you have firsthand knowledge that someone owns this thing you call money, and if so, would you please enlighten me about that as well? Could it be everyone cares about the misses, cause she always DTF?

    “could it be? batman? there is NO EVIDENCE of JurisDICKtion? whether you have a NAME or not?(besides the guns and cages)…could it be? its all about control of your mind?(and they’ve accomplished that on you already) could it be you’ve already been enslaved in your NAMEgame?, and are duped into playing? with or without that NAME/Name/name?..

    Jon/JON/JAn/jUaN/wan/yan. ying/yang..peace in and out.”

    I believe it could be. If you believe it is, please enlighten me? Thanks again brother.

  10. Jeff Evans Says:

    About to listen to the show. Sometimes I read these post and amazed at thlack of value in some comments. If one hasn’t read Marc’s books and research the material he has pit out their for us to see for ourselves; why comment?
    I have used Marc’s approach after doing a lot of research and reading his books. He even got a sorry ass Judge to avoid the question which is the foundation on why our asses are dragged into court like dumb goats. My son went into court and the judge refused to answer any of his questions out right! I have this on several court transcripts. The judge tried to intimidate him, but my son doesn’t know any better and still ask the judge the root question. Because these clowns know you got them by the balls with a meat hook they try to give you the impression that your insane, illiterate and not worth the shit on the bottom of their shoes. They do this because as Marc says, no one has the courage to stand-up for themselves and bend over and spread em whenever the going get tough. When a federal judge says that “laws are arbitrary” and the other give a Argumentum ad Baculum for an offer of evidence there law are applicable, no more do I respect these petty clowns or even give the nonsense they say a second though. Everything that comes out their lying mouths I can come back with someone in higher authority’s opinion to trump their B.S. and if you need to break it down for them logically Marc has done that in his book using their own rational and logic they run from when we use their same B.S. against them in the form of a “QUESTION.” Marc don’t sweat these puppets with grey matter in their heads, because if you wanted to sellout and become a millionare today all you would have to do is get a book deal. Your better than me because after the lack of reaction after discrediting that lame judge, I would have carried the few loyal folks with me and made our families financially independent and wealthy. Your one tough cookie monster!

  11. Jeff Evans Says:

    Excuse the spelling. eyesite kinda weak tonight.

  12. Thad Says:

    “government” types are the only ones thinks the laws/rules apply to everyone…..but themselves.

  13. Deb Says:

    I wonder if anyone has seen this?

    https://youtu.be/HM7gc0khGW0

  14. Skyler J. Collins Says:

    NonEntity, I see it in my own kids (the questioning), and most kids until they hit school. And then it’s slowly sucked out of them (curiosity).

  15. RAD Says:

    Most kids are taught by means of ad baculuum “or else” type threats (appeals to spanking or punishment) so they come to associate threats with “truthiness”. IMO.

2 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. NSP – May 2, 2014 – Guest: Skyler J. Collins - Freedom's Floodgates Says:

    […] By Calvin […]

  2. CoS - Apr 27, 2015 - Unqualified Agents' Downgraded Intelligence - MarcStevens.net Says:

    […] Here are the two Call-of-Shame recordings featured on the May 2nd No STATE Project broadcast and podcast. […]

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

Saturday, 4-7pm EST: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream broadcast via Ustream.tv. You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.





Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.






Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter


Advertise Here