Fun show, lots of info again today. I started with some really stupid criticism where I’m accused of being a “pseudolawyer” and that I use circular logic. Yes, asking for proof of an assertion is circular logic to some people. I’ll have a separate video about these latest false claims against me.
Spoke with Jake about pseudo-skeptics, those who refuse to apply skeptic principles to the concept of government.
Jay from Texas and I spoke about defending against property taxes.
Discussed prosecutorial misconduct with Jeff from Fremont. He got a response from a prosecutor where the prosecutor claims he is not required to provide proof of an essential element of the charges. He also claimed the cop is an expert in the interpretation and application of the law. We already know this is a lie as the prosecutor himself will object on cross the witness is not qualified.
Comment here: http://www.marcstevens.net/board/thread-8820.html