Categorized | NSP Radio Archive

NSP – Mar 18, 2017 – Guest: Alistair Kinnear

Posted on March 18th, 2017 by Calvin

We welcome back Alistair Kinnear to the show to discuss a barrage of lividly exciting topics relating to NLP (neuro linguistic programming) techniques and use-cases.

Show Notes:

  • Replicating the success stories by use of refining Socratic questioning to exercise effective damage-control on 3 continents [Ireland, England [+1], Canada [+1], Israel, Poland, Deutschland, and Australia] is a testament to its universally high-potency towards exposing criminals who believe it is legitimate to force other people to pay them.
  • We are still standing-by for an update on Jermaine from Calgary.
  • A brief explanation of NLP.
  • Speculation on tenuous links to the CIA with the development, and possibly weaponization, of NLP.
  • Defensively incorporating a hint of NLP in your effective Socratic questioning when actively engaged in litigation.
  • Targeting those whom have above-average obedience levels and high suggestibility for metal programming.
  • How do authoritarians not worry about the consequences of their oppression and ethical incongruity?
  • What is meant when we say the “true believers” are “like religious zealots.”
  • Slayer‘s “Christ Illuition” album.
  • Stanley Milgram’s famous “Obedience to Authority” experiments.
  • Working out inconsistencies between our guiding principals and our incongruent actions.
  • The challenge and art-form of synchronizing and mastering your principals to your actions.
  • Syncing your patterns of communications with the language patterns with who you are talking to.
  • Reprogramming or inducing behaviors via pattern interruptions and by offering choice instead of simply robotic responses.
  • Modeling positive behavior patterns and stimulus.
  • Deescalating stressful situations and building report.
  • Marc’s early days of discovering anarchy through the NLP teachings of Bandler and Grinder.
  • Understanding who you are achieving ‘justice’ for when you are the one being aggressed against and oppressed.
  • If you don’t develop your own narrative, then you will tend adopt somebody else’s, even if it conflicts your own nature and interests.
  • Do you have any core principals worth standing-up for and really defending?
  • The social consequences of losing trust and integrity of news sources, reporting services, and so-called objective journalism.

  • You cannot spin the fact that government are just men and women forcing us to pay them.
  • Government schools are designed to quell dissenting, critical thought and analysis.
  • Escaping the stagnantly perpetual wage-slave cycle.
  • Using ad-blocking tools like uBlock Origin to consume your media without corporations penetrating your psychology and behavior.
  • The double-standard of scientists advising people to be more objective and data-dependent, but then turn around and go advocating for a violently religious institution such as government.
  • The general-public’s conditioned affection for their institutional abusers and authoritarians.

  • Politicians breaking their promises that favor the general-public after they obtain office, then making moves to victimize those who got them there in the first place.
  • Circumventing systems of behavior control and oppression.
  • “Those who challenge the rationale of the game are its most dangerous opponents.”
  • The importance of trying to understand WHY people believe what they believe.
  • Learning to fully embrace yourself to let go of resistance from your weaknesses and blind-spots.
  • The popular appeal nationalism lends to the masses and ruling classes.
  • Derren Brown demonstrates how to hypnotize Simon Pegg.
  • Nobody’s right when everybody’s wrong.
  • Politics radicalizes people into a mutually-destructive belief system.
  • Statists will play off of vulnerable people’s contentions to dominate via divide and conquer.
  • Metallica‘s, Iron Maiden’s, Pink Floyd’s, and Megadeth‘s anti-war overtones and inspirational music.
  • War is a racquet.

Alistair Kinnear’s points-of-contact are as follows:

              

82 Comments For This Post

  1. Max Says:

    peter gabriels, Milgrams 37, we do what we’re told

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XZ_5B5mJS0

  2. Max Says:

    Along the same idea, Peter Himmelman, Climb, also featured of miami vice,

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9utvL_IYLE

  3. Tony Says:

    A strange interview, the deep seated nonsense I was subjected to by the wonderful body called the STATE has no triggers anymore, as a” LIE, is a LIE, is a LIE” and when caught out, they attempt to deepen the “LIE & DECEIT” with the “Lets just stick with STUPID”, peace be upon you Marc & what ever message this was trying to send to people. As I said all is taken at face value…PEACE

  4. les Says:

    @Marc Stevens… A double standard maybe?

    In this show (and a few others) you make reference to “the Nazis” in context to the German armed forces of WW2, yet to yourself you only ever use the reference “the military” to your time in the armed forces.

    So my question to you is why.

    Why do you refer to the armed forces of one nation at a specific time in history by placing joinder between said military and the “governing” political party name, but you don’t apply that same standard to your time in the armed forces for the “governing” political party in your time?

    To be consistent, shouldn’t you drop “i was in the military” and use, “i fought for the Republican/Democrat private interest armed forces” or “I was a Republican/Democrat”?

    If this isn’t a double standard then this leaves us with limited options as to why you do this.

    It could just be you’re not applying critical thought as to why you call the German army of WW2 by the name “Nazis”.. or it could be that you are yourself just (potentially unknowingly) “repeating the accepted party line”?

    Also, if you would refer to a German soldier of WW2 who was no longer in the armed forces for whatever reason as being a “Nazi”, would it be inconsistent for you to refer to yourself as being a “Republican/Democrat”?

    Please can you address these questions?

    As you know, just because lots of people claim the “Nazis” did this or that does not make such a claim true and there are at least two sides to every story.

    Search: Adolf Hitler The Greatest Story Never Told.

    Apart from the above criticism… keep up the great work and thanks for any and every time you play Megadeth.

    Of Germanic descent, Les

  5. Don Will Says:

    What a GREAT and IMPORTANT discussion.

  6. HooliganHoodlum1904 Says:

    Marc, I put your methods to work on March 12 2017 at 4th Ave for Initial Appearance, in front of Pro Temp Eartha Washington….she asked my name and date of birth….I replied….” Here by Special Appearance, under duress, Challenging Personam, Subject-Matter and Territorial Jurisdiction.”

  7. NonEntity Says:

    HH1904…what a tease! You just gonna leave us hanging here after that lead in? That would be cruel. Just sayin’.

  8. Habenae Est Dominatus Says:

    NonE, Mark your calendar. I agree with you on that point.

  9. Habenae Est Dominatus Says:

    “Why do you refer to the armed forces of one nation at a specific time in history by placing joinder between said military and the “governing” political party name, but you don’t apply that same standard to your time in the armed forces for the “governing” political party in your time?”

    Was it the Republicans or the Democrats that invaded N. Korea; Viet Nam; Cambodia; Iran; Lebanon; Granada; Libya; Panama; Kuwait; Somalia; Haiti; Bosnia?

    It’s all one political party in my book.
    Image to explain:
    http://synapticsparks.info/images/linkable/notfrommyperspective.png 6.2kb.

  10. ICBMCatcher Says:

    So … stevens banishes me from this thread to the forum, yet others my post as often as they like and as many “walls of text as they wish”

    Now why would that be?

    I am zeroing in on his core BS and am about to obliterate him.

    Rethinking my decision to be polite and respectful to stevens wishes – ICBMCatcher

  11. les Says:

    @ Habenae Est Dominatus:

    Not sure that you address the question, but a good illustration non the less.

    Your illustration is helpful indeed and makes my questions even more valid. As the USA, Great Britain, France and the Soviets all used war propaganda, diss-info and mass mind control (not to mention war crimes and various atrocities) my questions becomes even more important.

    Why finger the “Nazis” rather than the “Republicans/Democrats/Liberals/Conservatives/Socialists”. When all is boiled down, Marks just repeating the accepted party line. A total lack of critical though… from my perspective.

    My original questions still stand unanswered.

  12. NonEntity Says:

    les makes an interesting point. The water we grew up swimming in was serious propaganda. I tried to look at the documentary you linked to but our controllers have made it nigh on impossible. I do know that much or most of the “holocaust” story and data is at the very least exaggerated. If the story and the data are true why do they go to such extreme lengths to prevent scholarship into it all. Scholarship can only reinforce the truth if it is indeed the truth. If you’ve ever been involved in a power structure, be it a small town or business or whatever, you must recognize that all of the real control is not on the surface but is hidden behind the scenes and what is put out for public consumption is a fabricated story to assuage the rubes. The public figures are all just puppets who serve at the pleasure of the real centers of power and will befall bad luck if they actually try to have any integrity. JFK is only the most obvious example.

  13. HooliganHoodlum1904 Says:

    NonE….Eartha Washington brought me back to court 2 days later…dropped felony resisting with NO Bond to misdemeanor resisting and disorderly with 5,000 bond. I did something different, but achieved same result, not allowing Jurisdiction to be obtained through Constructive Consent. Mind u waking up 4:30 in morning to have leg shackles and handcuffs for 11 hours straight (twice) in 7 day period not fun.
    Also NO County Attorneys or Defense attorneys present during these kangaroo courts.

  14. les Says:

    @ ICBM

    Friend, have you really thought through what you have posted here? I mean really thought about what you have claimed.

    “Those in government are ELECTED or APPOINTED by those who have BEEN ELECTED by the voters.” Just how do you KNOW these people were “voted” for? I may be incorrect here, but is it not true that you (as in US law) cannot disclose just who voted for who in any election of the positions you mentioned? How do you know, as a matter of fact, that you, me or any body actually voted for these people? HOW do you support this claim? Just stating that “people voted” is not evidence of a fact.

    If you cannot prove with factual evidence that these people were voted for by those they (the ones you claim to be government) claim to govern, then they (government) fall directly in to the position that Mark argues.

    You cannot claim “we pay them to do a job” until you prove they were duly elected. Until you do that these people are still factually other men and women forcing us to pay them.

    You consistently conflate Marks position of “other men and women forcing us to pay them” with this infantile retort that if you did that it would be extortion, not to mention you accusing him of “oversimplification”.

    You are making a fool of yourself with your posts.

    Before you posted “stevens banishes me from this thread to the forum”, what was going through your mind. If you had been banished, what made you think anything you wrote would be posted? Can’t you see the logical contradictions between your claims, thoughts and actions? This is partly why people can’t take your points seriously. You insinuate that I posted “walls of text”, but if you compare what I wrote with what you write, you’ll notice that I do apply logic and make rational points. You don’t.

    Seriously, you should try to think through what you are going to post for a day or so first.

  15. NonEntity Says:

    les sed, “Seriously, you should try to think…” — seriously? 🙂 SERIOUSLY?!? 🙂

  16. Habenae Est Dominatus Says:

    http://marcstevens.net/board/thread-8888-post-65932.html#pid65932

  17. NonEntity Says:

    wall of te…

  18. Max Says:

    Reality is when they don’t really care that you voted, but that you submitted to register to vote. A gotcha moment where you a are by this deed, deemed to be party to the prevailing fantasy.

  19. les Says:

    @ ICBM

    ICBM says “How do you know, as a matter of fact, that you, me or any body actually voted for these people? HOW do you support this claim?”

    I asked a question, a question is not a claim. The rest of your “deconstruction” is just a stupid.

  20. Max Says:

    I for a time was watching Anonymous pickets Scientology videos out of morbid curiousity. Anonymous dug up what they would, Scientology would respond with: “What are your crimes?” Anonymous believed aspects of NLP were being used to manipulate scientology prospects/members. Scientology hasn’t exactly not stepped upon toes either. Psychiatry, the government and former members could be counted as among their enemies. I suppose Anonymous could even have been created by Scientology themselves, just to raise their own profile in the media. Anonymous may believe they were combating manipulation while they may have at the same time been a target of manipulation. As absurd as Scientology seems to those outside, the conviction and certainty of its adherants is amazing.

    ICBMCatcher please stop using “Win” and “Fail”, it detracts from LRH’s legacy.

  21. NonEntity Says:

    les, remember that less is more. This may be counter intuitive, but if you examine Habby’s posts you may quickly come to value the truth in this.

  22. NonEntity Says:

    Marc, in order to be logically consistent, since we have call of shames, these should be wall of texts. 😉

  23. ICBMCatcher Says:

    Does max imply I am a Scientologist ? Hardly.

    I’m just a mere citizen … calling BS every single time I hear/see it.

    ICBMCatcher

  24. les Says:

    @ NonE

    I respect irreducible complexity. I try to keep things as short as possible but some points require background let’s say. Re’ voting, nobody can prove to me, to you or to whoever that, person A was voted for over person B. So as a result there is no evidence that anybody voted for person A rather than person A being preselected. Thus no evidence of anybody being voted for and eligibility for the position in vote. From my perspective, sure people walk into a booth and make a mark on a piece of paper, but that’s when the factual element of voting stops.

    I guess I presupposed people would recognize that. Admittedly naive considering who that post was aimed at.

  25. Max Says:

    No, Icbm, I was staying relevent to the subject of this post and sending some love for you at the same time. Am I the tasker, the multitasker, the scientologist or citizen? The “win”,”lose” or “fail” terminology has parallels within scientology, and the legal system depressingly. “Rising” is another in social media. Is it possible to lie about a lie?

  26. Max Says:

    @les

    While who or what you voted is anonymized, registering shows you showed up to visit indirect violence upon your fellow peoples. If you do this, why should you not be subject to the same?

  27. les Says:

    @ ICBM

    and right on cue there you go again. Not addressing the point but attempting to flip the burden of proof. It was YOU (March 27th, 2017 at 6:27 pm) who claimed government exists because people voted for them, ergo the burden is upon YOU to support that claim. I just pointed out to you that your rational of you making a mark on a piece of paper isn’t proof of anything more than just that. Obviously I’m going to say your replies are stupid, I call stupid every single time I hear/see it.

    still not getting rational proof of claim from ICBM, les

  28. Max Says:

    Capnchap;

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xa41GPiCAyI

  29. Max Says:

    Why do you believe in running lives?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXaAbjkZOcI

  30. Max Says:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8VGCVSDDX8

  31. Habenae Est Dominatus Says:

    NonEntity Says:
    March 28th, 2017 at 7:40 pm

    les, remember that less is more. This may be counter intuitive, but if you examine Habby’s posts you may quickly come to value the truth in this.

    Yep. Sound bites are just what is needed.

    Just puking up a sound bite like: “ICBM is an imbecile” may be short and factual… But then, for the neophyte, it may just read like ICBM’s claims. If fails to provide what, when, where, who, how, and why.

    And as eye2 has pointed out to you many times, the use of the scroll bar is free and easy to use.

    P.S. You didn’t post any links to my posts to show les the examples.

    http://marcstevens.net/board/thread-8283-post-57863.html#pid57863

    http://marcstevens.net/board/thread-8221-post-56985.html#pid56985

    http://marcstevens.net/board/thread-8868-post-65781.html#pid65781

    http://marcstevens.net/board/thread-4196-post-29190.html#pid29190

    http://marcstevens.net/board/thread-4209-post-29370.html#pid29370

    http://marcstevens.net/board/thread-4308-post-30434.html#pid30434

    http://marcstevens.net/board/thread-4477-post-32652.html#pid32652

    http://marcstevens.net/board/thread-4477-post-32597.html#pid32597

  32. Max Says:

    Piazza you are trash.

  33. Max Says:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IiOSZbUOGo

  34. les Says:

    @ MAX

    “While who or what you voted is anonymized, registering shows you showed up to visit indirect violence upon your fellow peoples. If you do this, why should you not be subject to the same?”

    I’m missing something here. How does that address my point on voting? How does that prove person A was voted for rather than person B?

  35. Max Says:

    ICBMCatcher, did the king of russia need to be shot in the head?

  36. Max Says:

    @les

    It doesn’t

  37. les Says:

    @ Max

    I’m glad you said that. Thought i’d totally lost the plot for a moment. 🙂

  38. Max Says:

    Dick heads wanted you not to care who won, if you voted you agree. we might legally own you, until you realize consuming the masters grain is not endorsement. I will kill you.

  39. Max Says:

    If you wish to play punch out , I’m game.

  40. Max Says:

    nobody shows up

  41. Max Says:

    :

  42. les Says:

    @ ICBM

    “Supporting my claim – I voted, and saw millions of others vote.”

    Well here’s the problem with your appeal to popularity… each year BILLIONS (that’s more than 10s of millions by the way) of people celebrate something called Christmas. So do you accept therefore that the 25th of December IS the birth date of Jesus based on those numbers?

    If 10s of millions can’t be wrong then you must be totally fizzing with BILLIONS.

    waiting for ICBM to come up with some proof of claim… still, les

  43. Max Says:

    how is a complaint processed?

  44. Max Says:

    If complaint process sucks, do I get free shots in the parking lot? Even 1 for 1.

  45. Max Says:

    Russell Piazza wants to own people.

  46. les Says:

    @ NonE

    ““Seriously, you should try to think…” — seriously? 🙂 SERIOUSLY?!? 🙂”

    I just saw what you wrote, that’s funny. Made a bleak afternoon in the path of Cyclone Debbie (Australia) much brighter.

  47. Andy Says:

    @Max, can you consolidate your thoughts into one or two longer posts instead of a dozen or two five to ten word posts? Your barge of one-line posts moves all the other posts down the right side-bar and out of sight. Other people may never see or know about those posts that moved off the side bar. I actually ponder whether that is your intent. Have some courtesy for the other readers please.

  48. Max Says:

    Pardon me, I was waiting for a forum handle, had some beers. Feel free to delete.

  49. NonEntity Says:

    les, how refreshing to find someone around here with a sense of humor. Hope you survived the weather godz. Welcome to the other side of the planet. The best place for conversations and discussions and rants and stuff is on the forum, not here. If you email Marc he will put you in the forum. (You’ve got to jump through that hoop because of the spam bots, otherwise the place gets overrun by people like me.)

  50. NonEntity Says:

    I’m wondering, how many guys in a bar have to vote to make gang raping a girl okay? Is it a simple majority, or what?

  51. Andy Says:

    The difference between pulling a train and gang rape is one percent. If it’s a simple majority vote wouldn’t it be more accurate to call it pulling a train, not gang rape? At least put “raping” in quotes? Sheesh!

  52. NonEntity Says:

    Thanks for the clarification, Andy. I wuz all confused on the issue. Sorry for the poor punctuation, I’ll try to due butter.

  53. NonEntity Says:

    1% huh? Do if there’s 300 guys in the bar, and one girl, it would take more than 151 guys and the girl, to make the vote legit? (Just want to understand this democracy thing really good.) 152÷300=0.5066666667… or is it prior to round up to get that 1%? Oh, butt weight, if the girl voted FOR then it doesn’t matter, or does it? This is all so confusing. Maybe ICBM can help clarify this. But thanks for your tireless assistance anyway, Andy!

  54. Andy Says:

    Right, without first differing to ICBM, with 298 guys voting and the girl voting, it would be more accurate to say the difference between pulling a train and gang rape is one person’s vote — eg., 149 to 150. So I guess if the girl was the deciding vote, depending on her mood that day, it could go either way.

    It comes to mind, would the guys that voted ‘nay’ be violently/forced to participate/fu*k in the train/”rape”.

  55. NonEntity Says:

    Wait, wait, wait… I thought it was one percent over fifty percent? Are you makin’ this shit up as you go along???

  56. les Says:

    @ ICBM

    THANK YOU. You finally answered a question.

    So are you going to retract your claim that “government” was elected? After all you admit there’s no proof they were elected and it’s only your opinion they were and as “just because a lot of people believe something doesn’t make it true” you now recognize the appeal to popularity fallacy.

    One mans implication is just another mans key to critical thought.

    edited: “Your “Christmas analogy” is equally foolish — , but most people know it’s a story.” There’s that appeal to popularity again.

    Too much rain here so no chance of any fire at my feet, even if it is claimed to come from an ICBM…. les, waiting on a forum account

  57. NonEntity Says:

    ICBM sed,”EXACTLY … you’re a genius!

    AMAZED !” — Wow!!! Coming from you that’s a serious compliment! :-$

  58. les Says:

    Dare I say it? Could we be on the brink of something monumental?

    ICBM answers a question, acknowledges his appeal to popularity and recognizes an anarchist as a genius. Perhaps I’m the only one, but I’m imagining the Star Wars esque opening text scroll to the ICBM movie “A NEW HOPE… In a mind, far far away, lay the smoulders of critical thought…”

    Too much?

  59. les Says:

    @ ICBM

    This is my address: PO Box 3463, Nerang DC, QLD 4211, Australia. Please send me just 1 ounce of each.. The USA, Government, Law, Citizen, State, Jurisdiction, Police Officer, Soldier.

    I promise to refund you any and all shipping costs plus $100USD for each ounce you post. What’s that you say, you can’t provide evidence of these because they are just ideas in the minds of other men????

    What was that great philosophical quote by Descartes “I think, therefore my ideas apply to everyone else”?

  60. Max2 Says:

    ICBMcatcher,
    If you recall this obsession of yours is about jurisdiction. Have you ever dissected this word, to remove any ambiguity about it? Juris from the latin iuris, I think you will find that it is most commonly found as simply an “oath” or “promise”. The “diction” portion I think you will find refers to “spoken” as in “dictated”. Now anyone can take an oath or make a promise, the responsibility of bringing it to fruition never devolves to another, if this were not the fact, I could take out credit cards in your name, volunteer you for a tour in Iraq. Now, who already does this? Maybe a congress that has a spending problem, and finds wars not only profitable, but expediant to make parts of the populace complacent through fear? Sending kids into the meat grinder maw of war. To come back utterly dependant upon the other end of the machine that doles out the “charity”. Even when inducted they administer an oath to draftees, They are free to refuse. Why do they end up imprisoned? How do you convict someone under oath of refusing to take an oath? Of making a promise to promise when they never promised anything? Get it yet? “Thou shall not swear” had nothing to do with offensive language. Who is really the bad guy here? Most here seem to be for stopping the bullshit. You seem content to let the abuse of logic and reason continue.

  61. Andy Says:

    NonEntity said: “Coming from you that’s a serious compliment! :-$”

    I imagine if Neil deGrasse Tyson were to say you’re genius that would be a HUGE compliment; but Gumby, not so much.

  62. spooky2th Says:

    ICBM (I C Bowl-movement,) just keeps on getting stupider with each post. He probably can’t even see that he’s making a total fool of him self, post after post. But some people do get paid to be moronic clowns…

  63. NonEntity Says:

    Andy, wasn’t the :-$ a clue?

  64. Max2 Says:

    ICBMcatcher,
    If you recall this obsession of yours is about jurisdiction. Have you ever dissected this word, to remove any ambiguity about it? Juris from the latin iuris, I think you will find that it is most commonly found as simply an “oath” or “promise”. The “diction” portion I think you will find refers to “spoken” as in “dictated”. Now anyone can take an oath or make a promise, the responsibility of bringing it to fruition never devolves to another, if this were not the fact, I could take out credit cards in your name, volunteer you for a tour in Iraq. Now, who already does this? Maybe a congress that has a spending problem, and finds wars not only profitable, but expediant to make parts of the populace complacent through fear? Sending kids into the meat grinder maw of war. To come back utterly dependant upon the other end of the machine that doles out the “charity”. Even when inducted they administer an oath to draftees, They are free to refuse. Why do they end up imprisoned? How do you convict someone under oath of refusing to take an oath? Of making a promise to promise when they never promised anything? Get it yet? “Thou shall not swear” had nothing to do with offensive language. Who is really the bad guy here? Most here seem to be for stopping the bullshit. You seem content to let the abuse of logic and reason continue.

  65. Max2 Says:

    Fuck you russell piazza.

  66. Max2 Says:

    fuck awaiting moderation.

  67. Andy Says:

    Just checking, NonEntity,

  68. Andy Says:

    The question remains: would the guys that voted ‘nay’ be violently/forced to fu*k/”rape” the girl?

  69. Andy Says:

    Regarding the post at, March 27th, 2017 at 6:27 pm: If a majority of guys vote to rape a girl, will the guys that voted against raping the girl be violently forced to rape the girl?

  70. Andy Says:

    Is it because no one can identify who voted to rape the girl and no one can identify who voted against raping the girl, that all of them must rape the girl?

  71. Habenae Est Dominatus Says:

    ICBMCatcher Says:
    March 30th, 2017 at 6:44 am

    =======================

    ICBM put it on the forum you fucking idiot.

  72. NonEntity Says:

    Habby, was that post supposed to communicate something intelligible, or did you butt dial that in?

  73. Max2 Says:

    I think there is a memorial or two or three in D.C. that show this can change. Once an oath is taken, refusal to do anything becomes an offense, at the same time oathtakers are expected refuse the unlawful. An army of lawyers? I can’t decide if you live in smug comfort or abject fear the world is simply going to fall apart. It must be terrifying.

  74. Max2 Says:

    Who’s the fool now monkeyboy? Westminter Abbey is a whore.

  75. Habenae Est Dominatus Says:

    NonEntity Says:
    March 30th, 2017 at 8:12 am

    Habby, was that post supposed to communicate something intelligible, or did you butt dial that in?
    =======================
    Marc Stevens Says:
    March 28th, 2017 at 4:12 pm

    Take this to the forum, I will start deleting these walls of text.
    =======================
    Marc Stevens Says:
    March 25th, 2017 at 4:26 pm

    I said you need to take your posts to the forum. I’ll create the account for you, do not email me back.
    =======================
    http://marcstevens.net/board/thread-8888-post-65886.html#pid65886
    ICBMCatcher – back in action
    Greetings

    ICBMCatcher is now in the forum.

    Not sure what kind of visibility I’ll have, but I suspect stevens banished me here because it somehow blunts my assault on his anarchist nonsense.

    Time will tell.

  76. spooky2th Says:

    I C Bowl-movement, keeps on making his shite up as he posts. How much are ya getting paid to act like a clown here? Why don’t you post your success rate?

  77. NonEntity Says:

    I see. Marc sed all those things already, but you feel that by your personally posting links to them this will carry the enormous weight of your presence to the issue, an issue which meek little Marc has not sufficient mastery to properly convey. Is that it? I’m sure you’re write. ICBM must be quaking in his boots at this very moment. Good job! 🙂 I am personally filled with fear.

  78. Habenae Est Dominatus Says:

    Since you and he are earning the same amount of my respect…

    And the horse you rode in on.

  79. Max2 Says:

    Westminster Abbey is a whore

  80. NonEntity Says:

    My horse appreciates your concern. It’s rare she gets the credit she deserves.

  81. Max2 Says:

    That’s Why I do not care.

  82. Max2 Says:

    I’M A HORSE

1 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. LONDON CALLING | there is no debt Says:

    […] NSP – Mar 18, 2017 – Guest: Alistair Kinnear http://marcstevens.net/radioarchive/nsp20170318.html […]

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

Saturday, 4-7pm EST: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream broadcast via Ustream.tv. You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.





Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.






Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter


Advertise Here