Categorized | NSP Radio Archive, Video

NSP – Mar 25, 2017

Posted on March 25th, 2017 by Calvin

Show Notes:

Caller’s Topics:

  • Neo from CA: because of lack of preparation, the defendant got ‘woman-handled’ by commissioner Kathleen Jacobs during a recent traffic hearing while attempting to use the unsigned plea of guilty <> filing a correction of statements <> the motion to dismiss/demur was denied as the judge claimed there actually is valid cause of action, despite no factual elements of a valid cause for action were plead (specifically injury or damages) <> possibly an error in the paperwork filed <> filing a motion-to-strike because of the judge bullying the defendant into a plea before allowing them to discuss the intention to plea guilty in lieu of the prosecution’s evidence <> discovery is not an issue for arraignment <> inquiring who the plaintiff actually is <> made the mistake assuming the attorney general handles discovery requests <> going about reversing the judge’s erroneous decisions <> setting a hearing to have your motion to demur heard on a motion’s hearing day <> and more details on the recent success story in Alameda county.
  • Calvin from MO: it is a compelling assertion that ICBMCatcher is actually a government sock-puppet <> ethical consistency with vegetarianism vs. veganism <> is heme iron essential? <> fringe hypotheticals non-vegans use to justify their cruelty-based diets <> diet recommendations for a transitory vegan <> hitting a wall after a 70lb weight-loss <> day-zero for veganism <> the free-market solutions usually triumph when competing against non-free-market programs <> since when did logical fallacies constitute as evidence? <> you have a serious problem with your ‘sense of a word‘ when it conflicts with, and contradicts, so badly with it’s etymology <> and conflicting court opinions will not yield a high success-rate percentage.
  • ICBMCatcher: the champion of word-mincing is accusing us of word-mincing <> <circular logic>claims that “the constitution applies because we say it does“</circular logic> <> more “might makes right” <> and he cannot determine and define basic principals of self-defensive.
  • Scar from AZ: [could not connect due to technical difficulties]
  • Jermaine from Canada: extreme terms under which release from jail was finally granted <> judge recused himself from presiding over the hearing <> all current charges are based upon failure to comply violations <> charges that were dismissed for mistrial are still stayed <> the petition for a writ of habeas corpus worked <> they design probation so that it is difficult for you not to violate it so they can then find you in violation of probation if they choose to escalate their bureaucratic attack <> the judge admitted they didn’t have jurisdiction, but they still held their victim despite such a damning admission <> handwriting and submitting the motion to dismiss and discovery request <> 67 days in jail, under 23½-hour lock-down <> prepping and role-playing for an upcoming petition for a writ of habeas corpus hearing <> how should you respond if the judge goes out of his way to take judicial notice of jurisdiction? <> sticking to the prosecutor’s burden-of-proof, and not allowing them to flip the burden-of-proof on you while keeping in mind that “the fact not appearing is presumed not to exist” <> post-hearing update: the judge ruled the habeas corpus was irrelevant on grounds that “the defendant was released” <> the next hearing is dragging-out to later this year in mid-October <> working around their sluggish administrative processes and procedure <> the prosecution went stone-faced after being asked for evidence of jurisdiction that they could not produce <> enduring the abuse for defending yourself against the prosecution’s baseless assertions and lack of evidence <> the inhumane gladiator environment within some jails; including Canada <> and continuing exercising effective damage-control because of the belief that “nobody should be caged for a nonviolent violation.”

              

1 Comments For This Post

  1. Boxer Says:

    You’re still giving ICBM attention?

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

Saturday, 4-7pm EST: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via youtube.com. You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.





Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. or Occupant 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.






Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter


Advertise Here