Categorized | Success Stories, Video

Ticket Dismissed in Australia – No Evidence to Offer

Posted on February 7th, 2017 by Marc Stevens

It’s been a while, but we’ve got another ticket dismissed in Ipswich, Australia.  Thanks to George for acting as a McKenzie friend for Lee and getting this ticket dismissed.  Congrats to Lee for taking a principled stand against the criminals called “government.”  From George ( I edited out names):

Hi Marc
I am reporting another win this time from Australia.  My name is George and in this case I used the Motion to Dismiss for my friend (I was there helping him as his McKenzie Friend in court).  I help lots of people as a McKenzie Friend going from court to court every month.  You have my consent to use this attached paper work in your radio/internet show (just blank his family name only).
Funny thing about this is we were running late to court that day (10 minutes).  That case was listed first (very unusual).  All was dismissed without Defendant present in court room.
The motion is called an application in Australia and is based on the same lack of evidence as in the United States.  That’s because the men and women called “government” in Australia use the same claim, that if one is physically in Australia, their special rules called “laws” apply.  There’s no evidence proving that claim is true, doesn’t matter if in the US or Australia.  The documentary proof of the dismissal is below, including a short transcript.


While critics will claim that this is in no way because of the motion, that despite Lee’s entire defense to this point being an application to dismiss based on a lack of evidence, it was for “a hundred other reasons”.  That the only certainty here is that it is absolutely NOT because of Lee’s defense.

I think we should go based on the evidence.  The ticket was dismissed because there was “no evidence to offer.”  Could it have been based on no evidence to support the charge?  Yes, but that would mean a false complaint was filed and the judge looked the other way.  Which explanation is more likely based on the available evidence?
Also, Lee was looking at six months in jail, so this is worse than a traffic ticket.
Congrats to both George and Lee for prevailing on a principled stand against these predators.

7 Comments For This Post

  1. les Says:

    Well done George/Lee.
    Would you be able to post the actual forms you submitted? Obviously redacted is most welcome.

  2. George Says:

    Contact Marc and he will supply you one.
    Motion to Dismiss is the one u need.


  3. les Says:

    I have Marcs motions, was referring more to the actual Aussie Form number/names etc. E.g, was it a Conditional Notice of Intent to Defend form?

  4. Sandeep Says:

    Hi Marc and George,
    I would like to know the details of which form to use. I am from Sydney, Australia. I have a traffic case coming up in a week. I have done the three step process here. I am eager to learn more and know my rights.
    George, how can i get in touch with you and learn and defend my rights.

  5. Ruth A Says:

    Dear George,

    Well done, I would appreciate you contacting me. As to the exact wording on the Application to Dismiss.

    Congrats and thanks for informing me of a McKenzie friend.

    Kind wishes
    Ruth A

  6. steve Says:

    i would also like to know about the forms used?

  7. steve Says:

    hey there good job mate, i am also in Australia, Queensland to be exact out past kingaroy. i would greatly appreciate you contacting me. i have a son in jail and held with no evidence, only circumstantial. i would like to know the process of trying to get him out of jail or at least on bail? would you help me please or put me on to the right paperwork? with kindest regards steve

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here

Upcoming Events

: Tune-in to the LIVE No STATE Project broadcast as we report on the weekly happenings in legal-land and current events. You may call-in to the show at (218) 632-9399 passcode is 2020#, or Skype-in, with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then feel free to call-in to the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or you'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and he can add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

Wednesday, 6-7pm EST: Tune-in to the new No STATE Project midweek commercial-free video-stream now broadcast via You can join Marc live, or contact Marc to ask a question if you cannot make it on live. You can find archives of the Wednesday broadcast here on the website and on YouTube.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.

Contact update: If you email me a wall of text, then I probably will not read it. If you email me telling me to call you right away I won't. You'll have to set up a phone consult so we can set an appointment.

Mailing address has changed as of 1 October 2016. The new mailing address is: G.M. 1496 N. Higley Rd., Suite 102-37 Gilbert, Arizona 85234.

Join Marc Stevens' Newsletter

Advertise Here