Congrats to Dale for standing up to the predators in Wash. DC and getting two traffic charges dismissed. This is three we’re able to post for DC. Diron’s is here.
This is more direct evidence the motion and what I teach is effective and does get ticket’s dismissed. Contrary to what critics say, challenging jurisdiction, the claim the constitution applies to you, is the foundation of a very effective defense. Not being to prove their claim the constitution applies to us, they are not able to prove their rules apply, they cannot prove jurisdiction, cannot prove there is a case or controversy, and cannot prove their rules were violated.
Dale was charged by a predator and forced to participate and defend himself. The motion to dismiss is based on a lack of evidence proving jurisdiction and a valid cause of action. As the below document proves, that is why the charges were dismissed.
Are there other explanations? Could the judge have based his decision on something else the prosecution was lacking? Yes, but the evidence is clear and we have to speculate or assume another explanation. Also, traffic courts are run by criminals, they don’t throw tickets out based on a defense not raised. From the order:
Your request for mail adjudication on the ticket(s) listed above has been reviewed. Based on your statement and/or evidence or the government’s failure to meet its burden of proof, the ticket was dismissed by a hearing officer.
We argue the prosecution cannot meet their burden of proof, not for the applicability of their magic rules, jurisdiction, not for a valid cause of action, and not for proving wrong doing. Here, the dismissal was because the prosecution failed to meet their burden of proof.
Congrats and thanks to Dale for providing me with documentary proof of the charges being dismissed. Always fight these criminals, even if you intend on making a deal, challenge the prosecution and get some leverage for a better deal.
If they could prove their magical documents applied to us, then they’d just provide the proof. They would not argue their rules don’t require evidence or that the evidence is the other people they threw in jail to rot. They’d just put the evidence on the table.