Another example in the series: IRS: American Terrorist Organization. This time a supervisor who, true to the IRS standard, had already determined there will be no hearing as hearings are not permitted. It doesn’t matter their own law requires it, the law is for show and the IRS is a terrorist organization part of the larger terrorist cartel, the United States government.
Clearly the appropriateness of collection action is with the scope of a face-to-face hearing:
But the terrorists of the IRS are not interested in fairness, why should they when they force us to pay them?
The agent knows full well we can challenge “appropriateness of collection actions” and that is why he refuses to answer the questions I asked. The agent is a criminal. His intent from the start is to deny any kind of meaningful hearing
The only way we can stop these criminals is through mass non-compliance. Otherwise they’ll continue stealing from us to hire more agents to terrorize us into compliance.