Posted on May 17th, 2016 by Marc Stevens
It’s been a pretty good year getting complaints dismissed, this is another from New York. Congrats to Lee for defending himself successfully against the government gangsters. And thanks for giving me the proof.
Regardless of the claims from the critics, such as this youtube troll:
Plenty of complaints have been dismissed or kicked out, and yes, the motion has been granted, though the critics can’t stand it. What they cannot do, just the bureaucrats can’t, is provide relevant facts supporting their claims the “laws” apply to us.
When you have no facts to support your claim you just lie and try to distract from the lack of evidence. If you’re being attacked, even if just a traffic ticket, and you’re interesting in learning how to defend yourself, then listen to the No State Project; Government: Indicted has also helped many people learn to effectively defend themselves from these criminals called “government.”
[Update] There are six more charges Lee had kicked out.
Posted on May 13th, 2016 by Marc Stevens
Congrats to Chrisitne for standing up to the predators in Wales, and thanks for sending me the proof. This is our first dismissal in Wales, at least as far as I know.
This was a traffic ticket and Chrisitne filed the application to dismiss he got from me. The application is based on a lack of evidence proving the laws applied just because he is physically in Wales, no jurisdiction and no valid cause of action.
A. Slight, the prosecutor, withdrew his complaint on grounds:
“there is not enough evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction.”
Given the application is based on a lack of evidence, it’s easy to see why Slight declined to prosecute. There is no guess work here, though critics will speculate it had nothing to do with the application.
And critics will further dismiss this saying “it’s just a traffic ticket.” A traffic ticket is based on the same claim as more serious charges, that your physical location makes their rules (“laws”) magically apply to us.
It’s no easier to prove the laws apply in a traffic case as it is in a tax or drug case. It’s impossible to do, that is why A. Slight, like so many others, declined to prosecute.
If you think there is evidence proving the laws apply to Chrisitne, evidence the crown prosecutor could not provide, then please call into a live broadcast and present it.
Posted on December 12th, 2014 by Marc Stevens
This is very unusual; as I mention in the video below I’ve never seen this before. Usually a trial by declaration is another form of pleading guilty.
But Al’s wife prevailed. Al got a demur template from me and mailed it to the court. The demur challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the complaint. Because the complaint contains no facts or allegations the constitution and code apply, there is no jurisdiction and there are not enough facts to set forth an offense.
Al did not say there was a response from the cop or prosecutor. Even if they responded, it would not have been with any facts the constitution and code applied and there was jurisdiction. What is comes down to is the argument the laws apply and there is jurisdiction has no factual support. Here the judge did the right thing, though sustaining the demur was more appropriate.
Congrats to Al and his wife, and thanks for providing me with the documentary proof.
Posted on November 19th, 2014 by Marc Stevens
Two new dismissals and one from last year reported below. Everyone filed the motion to dismiss based on a lack of evidence proving the constitution and code applied and there was jurisdiction. While most of the time there are howls of “frivolous” and one word denials, there is never any evidence presented to overcome the motion.
We even have a picture of the judge who dismissed the complaint against Ted, David Ruzumna.
Congrats to Garrett, Ted and Rob for standing up to the psychopaths and getting three more bogus complaints kicked out. And thanks for sending me the documentary proof.
Posted on November 13th, 2014 by Marc Stevens
It was another good week regarding bogus traffic tickets; three tickets kicked out. These are all from the east coast, Maine, New York, and New Jersey. Each filed a motion to dismiss based on a lack of evidence proving the constitution and code apply and there was jurisdiction and no valid cause of action.
None of the accusers were able to provide a single fact proving the constitution and code apply and none of them even tried; though in Maine they did try scaring Scott into not going to trial.
Congrats and thanks to everyone for providing the documentary proof below.
Posted on September 23rd, 2014 by Marc Stevens
A big congrats to Joshua for standing up to the parasites and getting a ticket kicked out. And a big thanks for sending me the evidence posted below.
While critics argue this does not “count” as traffic courts are not “real courts” and that real issues are not raised, they’re wrong. The same issues are raised as would be, and have been raised, in “real” courts that involve felony and misdemeanor charges. Keep in mind critics just can’t accept the truth: there are no governments, just men and women forcing us to give them money; they are criminals despite calling themselves “honorable”.
The main issue raised in the motion to dismiss/demur is the prosecutor has not presented any evidence the constitution and laws of the plaintiff “state” apply and there is any jurisdiction. This groundless argument (the laws apply to us) is the basis of a traffic ticket and a felony possession charge. So the venue is not important, the same argument is made against you, so it’s logical to attack that same argument. Pay no attention to the critics’ logical fallacies and distractions.
That’s what Joshua did and it resulted in the ticket being kicked out. Another example where someone stood up for himself and didn’t hire an attorney (officer of the court) and argue issues of law hoping the lawyer with the robe agreed with him. No, he stuck to issues of fact and pointed out the prosecution had not presented facts. That cannot just be “denied”, the facts must appear on the record. Yes, the judge can avoid the issue, but that doesn’t make the facts magically appear.
If you are being attacked by those called government, it would be smart and effective for y ou to challenge their arguments, the foundation being: the constitution and laws apply and they have jurisdiction over you.
It is not in your best interest to give the people attacking you a free pass. There are no sacred cows, all arguments are subject to challenge. If you think this argument should not be challenged, please call the show and enlighten us with your reasoning.
Posted on June 5th, 2014 by Marc Stevens
Joey called in the No State Project this past week and related to us what happened when he and his wife went to defend against a bogus traffic ticket. Congrats to Jennie for standing up to these bullies and not just paying and making it easier for the machine.
As pointed out below, even though the prosecutors told the cop the motion would never hold up in court, the cop withdrew the charges. Because the only logical thing to do when a motion with no merit is filed is to quietly withdraw.
But there is a caveat: according to critics and internet gurus, traffic courts are not “real courts” and getting traffic tickets doesn’t count. So take the information, as well as everything, with a healthy dose of skepticism and verify everything for yourself.
Posted on August 6th, 2013 by Marc Stevens
I received an email from Raul in Florida; a friend was fighting a bogus ticket in Florida. Raul helped by filing a motion to dismiss for a lack of evidence proving the constitution and laws of the state of Florida (a fiction) applied. Also there is no valid case or true adversary.
Raul’s friend got a call from the prosecutor who offered a deal, it was rejected and they attended a hearing on the motion to dismiss. When it was their turn, the prosecutor stood up and stated nolle prosequi, that he was not pursuing prosecution. As shown below, the judge signed off of threw the ticket out.
Congrats to Raul and his friend for standing up to predators and calling their bluff. Another example where a prosecutor, despite insisting the laws applied had no evidence to prove it. So he withdrew.
If there was evidence proving the constitution and laws applied, then they would just provide it.
Posted on July 11th, 2012 by Marc Stevens
A big congrats to our mate Keith in Melbourne, Australia. Keith is participating in the NSP parking ticket study and though it took a year, the ticket was essentially kicked out, or dropped whichever you prefer.
Keith got the ticket and was notified by people claiming to be the “City of Melbourne” of an alleged “infringement”. Keith challenged this “summary offense” with six letters asking for evidence. All he got were a few pictures; nothing to prove his presence with the City and jurisdiction.
As the one year deadline to formally lodge the application against Keith has run out, the matter is now closed. While we wanted to confront the people dba the “City of Melbourne” on their many fictions, Keith still got to challenge them on paper and they were of course, unable or unwilling, to provide any facts.
Keith’s newsletter is here Enewsletter no 18-2012 July 10 2012.
Feel free to contact me or Keith if you are interested in participating in the NSP parking study in Australia.
Posted on July 16th, 2016 by Marc Stevens
Congrats to Dan for getting a ticket kicked in Brooklyn. While this is “just a traffic ticket”, the same arguments are used against us with more serious charges. Territorial and personal jurisdiction are based on the same claim regardless of the court and charge, that if you are physically in New York, then the constitution and laws apply. There isn’t a shred of evidence to prove this though, as this latest order shows.
While this order doesn’t explicitly state the motion is being granted, the ticket was dismissed without trial.
I did photoshop the bottom section from the DMV website o the order, the above part, the actual order, has not been altered. I have permission to post Dan’s email here giving some of the details.
Thank you Marc!! This one for me is a biggie because I’m in New York and this would have been a few points against me and my insurance going up! I received this last year and sent your motion to dismiss. I actually was able uploaded the motion through the dmv website. I was scheduled for a hearing next week (1 year later) and was preparing to meet the pretend Judge. I starting gathering info on my own and from your website on how to present myself and then yesterday I received the attached. I knew that eventually I would be sending you this email thanking you for the insight. People…everything is not what you think! Question everything and believe nothing but in yourself. Marc, you are doing a great service to the people and I truly thank you from the bottom of my heart. People…do not roll over and accept this crap even if sometimes you might lose. Show them you are not going to go down without a fight (I’m mean…fact’s)!
PS: Marc…you have my permission to post this on your site if you wish as proof! Just take out the necessary info to protect the innocent. Thanks again!
Congrats to Dan and thank again for letting me post this documentary proof.